- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01817790
Assessment of Fluticasone Propionate on Ocular Allergy Symptoms
March 6, 2014 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Efficacy of Once-Daily Fluticasone Propionate Aqueous Nasal Spray 200mcg for 14 Days on Ocular Symptoms Associated With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
This study is designed to investigate the efficacy of fluticasone propionate (FP) on ocular symptoms associated with allergic rhinitis (AR).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
While the current FP approved indication for GSK marketed formulation is limited to the treatment of nasal symptoms, several large well-controlled studies in which FP maintained adequate control of nasal symptoms when administered in a dose of 200 micrograms (mcg) once-daily (QD) also suggested improvement in ocular symptoms.
This study will employ a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multi-center design that compares FP and placebo nasal sprays in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) to assess the effectiveness on ocular symptoms associated with AR.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
626
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Wilmington, North Carolina, United States, 28401-3331
- PPD Corporate Headquarters
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
12 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants with good general health (in the opinion of the investigator) with no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history
Participants with diagnosis of seasonal allergic rhinitis
- A clinical history (written or verbal confirmation) of allergic rhinitis with the seasonal onset and offset of nasal and ocular allergy symptoms during each of the last 2 mountain cedar pollen allergy seasons.
- A positive skin test reaction to (at least) the relevant allergen, mountain cedar pollen, as determined by the skin pricks method performed within 12 months of Visit 1).
Participants with allergic rhinitis symptom of at least moderate severity for randomization:
- An iTOSS of ≥ 4 and an iNCSS of ≥2 on the morning of randomization (Visit 3/Baseline).
- An averaged (rTOSS) of ≥ 4, and an averaged rNCSS of ≥2 for three of the five days during the placebo lead in
- Participant residing within a geographical environment where exposure to mountain cedar pollen is significant during the entire study period.
- Participant demonstrates understanding of the study and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent/assent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent/assent form. Children, ages 12 to 17 will be required to sign an assent form as part of the informed consent process.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants with known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
Participants with nasal disorders like:
- injury or surgery to their nose that the investigator believes would interfere with participation in the study.
- previously diagnosed with a severe physical obstruction of the nose (e.g., deviated septum) that could affect the deposition of double-blind intranasal study drug.
- Rhinitis medicamentosa
- Participants who have historical or current evidence of clinically significant uncontrolled disease like asthma, cardiac arrhythmias, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ocular herpes, glaucoma, hepatic or renal disease, malignancy etc.
- Presence of or symptoms of an active bacterial or viral infection.
- Participants who have conjunctivitis caused by an infectious agent.
- Participants with current, single eye or bilateral cataracts or participants who had cataract surgery within/less than 3 months
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Fluticasone propionate nasal spray
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray with strength per dose of 50 mcg/spray.
Two sprays of study treatment per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Nasal spray formulation (200 mcg/day)
Other Names:
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo nasal spray
Two sprays of placebo per nostril to be administered in morning.
|
Vehicle for Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS)
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
The Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores (eye itching/burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness), each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9.
Subjects completed rTOSS in the evening (PM rTOSS; 12 hours post morning nasal spray use) and once in the morning (AM score: prior to nasal spray use).
Daily (i.e. during one dosing interval) rTOSS is defined as the average of the PM rTOSS and the AM rTOSS of the next day prior to AM dosing.
The mean change from baseline in (daily, AM, PM) TOSS was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days; from Day 0 PM to Day 14 AM) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean Change From Baseline in AM rTOSS
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
rTOSS is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores (eye itching/ burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness), each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9.
For AM rToss, subjects completed rTOSS in the morning (AM score: prior to nasal spray use).
The mean change from baseline in AM rTOSS was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Change From Baseline in PM rTOSS
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
rTOSS is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores (eye itching/ burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness), each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9.
For PM rTOSS, subjects completed rTOSS in the evening, 12 hours post morning nasal spray use.
The mean change from baseline in PM rTOSS was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Itching/Burning
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
The AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye itching/burning using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9.
For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the morning, prior to nasal spray use.
The mean change from baseline in AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye itching and burning) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Itching/Burning
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
The PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye itching/burning using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9.
For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the evening, 12 hours post morning nasal spray use.
The mean change from baseline in PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye itching and burning) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Tearing/Watering
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
The AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye tearing/watering using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9.
For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the morning, prior to nasal spray use.
The mean change from baseline in AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye tearing/watering) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Tearing/Watering
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
The PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye tearing/watering using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9.
For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the evening, 12 hours post morning nasal spray use.
The mean change from baseline in PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye tearing/watering) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Redness
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
The AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye redness using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9.
For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the morning, prior to nasal spray use.
The mean change from baseline in AM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye redness) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Scores for Eye Redness
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
The PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score was assessed individually for eye redness using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe, for a possible score of 0-9.
For evaluation, subjects completed the scoring in the evening, 12 hours post morning nasal spray use.
The mean change from baseline in PM Reflective Ocular Symptom Score (eye redness) was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Change From Baseline in AM Pre-dose Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS)
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
Instantaneous total ocular symptom scores (iTOSS) assessments are self perceived evaluation of symptom severity immediately before the dose (how the subject feels at that point in time).
iTOSS (possible score of 0-9) is the sum of 3 individual participant-assessed symptom scores for eye itching/burning, eye tearing/watering, and eye redness each evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe.
Mean changes from baseline were calculated as treatment period iTOSS minus baseline iTOSS.
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Nasal Congestion Symptom Score (rNCSS)
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
The rNCSS is a participant perceived evaluation of overall congestion symptom severity (evaluated using a scale of 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, or 3=Severe) which was completed once in the evening (PM), and once in the morning (AM).
rNCSS is defined as the average of the PM rNCSS and the AM rNCSS of the next day prior to AM dosing.
The mean change from baseline in rNCSS (daily, AM, PM)was calculated as the subject's treatment period mean (over 14 days; from Day 0 PM to Day 14 AM) minus the baseline period (placebo run-in) mean.
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
End-of-treatment Assessment of Response to Therapy for Ocular Symptoms
Time Frame: Day 14
|
Overall response to therapy assessment was done using a 7-point categorical scale in which participants rated their response to therapy as follows: +3 = Significantly Improved; +2 = Moderately Improved; +1 = Mildly Improved; 0 = No Change; -1= Mildly Worse; -2 = Moderately Worse; -3 = Significantly Worse.
|
Day 14
|
Mean Change in Objective Assessment of Conjunctival Redness
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
Conjunctival redness was evaluated as a clinical sign of SAR by the investigator.
Scoring of severity was rated according to a 4-point scale: 0 = normal; 1 = Slightly pink; 2 = Moderately pink, some dilation; 3 = Intense red vessels, dilated.
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Changes From Baseline in Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniRQLQ) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
MiniRQLQ is a 14-item, disease-specific instrument for assessing the impact of allergic rhinitis on activities of daily living and overall well-being.
It measures five domains of functional impairment that are most important to subjects with SAR: practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, activity limitations, and other symptoms.
Participants scored their degree of impairment on a seven-point scale.
(0 - 6).
Mini RQLQ final score is the average of sub-scales, ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 6 (worst possible outcome).
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual MiniRQLQ Scores: Domain - Activities
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
MiniRQLQ is a 14-item, disease-specific instrument for assessing the impact of allergic rhinitis on activities of daily living and overall well-being.
Activity limitations is one of the domains of Mini RQLQ scores.
Participants scored their degree of impairment on a seven-point scale (0 = not troubled, 6 = extremely troubled).
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual MiniRQLQ Scores: Domain - Practical Problems
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
MiniRQLQ is a 14-item, disease-specific instrument for assessing the impact of allergic rhinitis on activities of daily living and overall well-being.
'Practical Problems' is one of the domains of Mini RQLQ scores.
Participants scored their degree of impairment on a seven-point scale (0 = not troubled, 6 = extremely troubled).
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual MiniRQLQ Scores: Domain - Nose Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
MiniRQLQ is a 14-item, disease-specific instrument for assessing the impact of allergic rhinitis on activities of daily living and overall well-being.
"Nose Symptoms" is one of the domains of Mini RQLQ scores.
Participants scored their degree of impairment on a seven-point scale (0 = not troubled, 6 = extremely troubled).
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual MiniRQLQ Scores: Domain - Eye Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
MiniRQLQ is a 14-item, disease-specific instrument for assessing the impact of allergic rhinitis on activities of daily living and overall well-being.
"Eye Symptoms" is one of the domains of Mini RQLQ scores.
Participants scored their degree of impairment on a seven-point scale (0 = not troubled, 6 = extremely troubled).
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual MiniRQLQ Scores: Domain - Other Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
|
MiniRQLQ is a 14-item, disease-specific instrument for assessing the impact of allergic rhinitis on activities of daily living and overall well-being.
"Other Symptoms" is one of the domains of Mini RQLQ scores.
Participants scored their degree of impairment on a seven-point scale (0 = not troubled, 6 = extremely troubled).
|
Baseline to 14 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2013
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 21, 2013
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
March 25, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
April 3, 2014
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 6, 2014
Last Verified
December 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Infections
- Respiratory Tract Infections
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Hypersensitivity, Immediate
- Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases
- Respiratory Hypersensitivity
- Hypersensitivity
- Nose Diseases
- Rhinitis
- Rhinitis, Allergic
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Dermatologic Agents
- Bronchodilator Agents
- Anti-Asthmatic Agents
- Respiratory System Agents
- Anti-Allergic Agents
- Fluticasone
- Xhance
Other Study ID Numbers
- RH01619
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Allergic Rhinitis
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenAZ Sint-Jan AVRecruitingPerennial Allergic Rhinitis | Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis | Local Allergic RhinitisBelgium
-
Organon and CoCompletedPerennial Allergic Rhinitis | Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
-
ALK-Abelló A/SCompletedPerennial Allergic Rhinitis | Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
-
Humanis Saglık Anonim SirketiCompletedPerennial Allergic Rhinitis | Seasonal Allergic RhinitisIndia
-
Organon and CoCompletedPerennial Allergic Rhinitis | Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
-
Organon and CoCompletedPerennial Allergic Rhinitis | Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
-
West Penn Allegheny Health SystemPennsylvania Allergy and Asthma Research FoundationCompletedAllergy | Perennial Allergic Rhinitis | Seasonal Allergic RhinitisUnited States
-
Ahn-Gook Pharmaceuticals Co.,LtdSamsung Medical Center; Seoul St. Mary's Hospital; Seoul National University... and other collaboratorsCompletedAllergic Rhinitis | Perennial Allergic Rhinitis | Non-seasonal Allergic RhinitisKorea, Republic of
-
United Allergy ServicesCompletedPerennial Allergic Rhinitis With Seasonal VariationUnited States
Clinical Trials on Fluticasone propionate
-
University of FloridaFood and Drug Administration (FDA)Completed
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
Teva Pharmaceuticals USATerminatedSeasonal Allergic RhinitisUnited States
-
PfizerCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedAsthmaUnited States, Argentina, Philippines, Canada, Brazil
-
Padagis LLCCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom
-
Boehringer IngelheimCompletedAsthmaUnited States, Australia, Canada, Colombia, Korea, Republic of, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Philippines, Taiwan