Efficacy of Neurofeedback Training in Adults With ADHD

March 8, 2017 updated by: Dr. Michael Schoenenberg, University Hospital Tuebingen

Efficacy of a Neurofeedback Treatment in Adults With ADHD: a Triple-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Study

Neurofeedback training (NFT) has been frequently investigated as an alternative treatment for ADHD mainly in children and adolescents. However, randomized double-blind trials that include a sham-neurofeedback control group are lacking, as well as studies examining the efficacy of NFT in adult ADHD populations. The inclusion of a sham-neurofeedback group is crucial to monitor and exclude unspecific effects.

This study aims to investigate the efficacy of NFT as compared to a sham-feedback condition and a cognitive behavioral treatment in adults with persistent ADHD.

Efficacy is assessed on several outcome parameters, such as symptom severity, neuropsychological variables (e.g., attention, memory), and EEG parameters.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Tuebingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 72076
        • Universitat Tubingen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • ADHD diagnosis
  • sufficient knowledge of the German language

Exclusion criteria:

  • psychiatric disorder(s) lifetime (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, borderline personality disorder)
  • neurological disorder (e.g., epilepsy)
  • current substance abuse disorder
  • receives psychotherapy (e.g., CBT) or medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Neurofeedback active
Active neurofeedback training, theta/beta-protocol
Sham Comparator: Neurofeedback sham
Neurofeedback training is simulated to subjects in this condition
Other Names:
  • placebo neurofeedback, simulated neurofeedback
Active Comparator: Metacognitive Training
Metacognitive training, cognitive behavioral therapy
Other Names:
  • cognitive behavioral therapy, group therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in ADHD symptomatology
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS) Scores
pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in co-morbid depression scores
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Scores
pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Changes in co-morbid anxiety scores
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Scores
pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Changes in neuropsychological variables: Attention
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Continuous Performance Test (CPT), Errors in Omission and Errors in Commission
pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Changes in neuropsychological variables: Interference
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Stroop Color-Word Test, Interference scores
pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Changes in neuropsychological variables: Cognitive Flexibility 1
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Test for Attentional Performance (TAP) - Flexibility, RT in ms and Errors
pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Changes in neuropsychological variables: Cognitive Flexibility 2
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Inventory for Complex Attention (INKA), Items correctly performed
pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Changes in electrophysiological markers
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Ln-transformed theta/beta ratio
pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Changes in event-related potentials 1
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Contingent Negative Variation Amplitudes
pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Changes in event-related potentials 2
Time Frame: pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)
Emitted P 300 Amplitudes
pre-treatment, after 8 weeks (mid-treatment), after 15 weeks (post-treatment) and after 6 months (follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Schönenberg, Dr, University Hospital Tuebingen
  • Study Chair: Martin Hautzinger, Prof. Dr., University Hospital Tuebingen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 21, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Clinical Trials on Neurofeedback active

3
Subscribe