Emotional Information Processing in Attention Deficit Disorder With or Without Hyperactivity (TIVE-TDA)

May 14, 2020 updated by: Fondation Lenval

Attentional and Emotional Processing of Complex Visual Scenes in Children With Attention Deficit Disorder With or Without Hyperactivity

The aim of this study is to analyse explicit and implicit emotional information processing abilities in children with attention deficit disorder with or without hyperactivity

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main symptoms of Attentional Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are inattention, motor agitation and impulsivity. However, other dysfunctions affecting the quality of life remain poorly studied: lack of understanding and management of emotions, focus on the local aspects of a visual scene limiting the ability to assign a general meaning to the scene and alteration of long-term memory encoding. This study aims to analyse these difficulties using different tasks requiring processing of rich and varied everyday images, having high ecological validity. It involves the participation of 56 boys and girls with ADHD, aged 7 to 12 years. A first phase examines the immediate understanding of images using two tasks: semantic categorization (Experiment 1) and emotional evaluation (Experiment 2) of images with positive, negative or neutral emotional valence, and depicting real environments (natural vs. manufactured contexts) or foreground objects pasted into a noise background (inanimate objects vs. animals vs. people. In each trial, one context image and one object image are presented briefly and simultaneously, one in each visual field. In order to be appropriately understood in both their semantic and emotional contents, context images will require more global processing, while object images will require more local, detailed processing. Their semantic (Exp. 1) and emotional (Exp. 2) consistency is manipulated. A week later, the participants have to perform a memory task requiring old/new recognition in a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) paradigm that presents in each trial a pair of images (one old, one new) having the same emotional valence (Exp. 3). The study will characterize the specificities of processing and representing visual emotional information in ADHD children. The results will be compared with those from a previous study we conducted with the same methodology on neuro-typical children (controls).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nice, France
        • Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children between 7 and 12 years old…………………………….
  • Normal or corrected visual acuity ……………………………….
  • ADHD diagnostic given by a doctor according to DSM 5 criteria (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)
  • Free from drug treatment until 24 hours before the experiment session……………………….
  • Affiliation to a social security system…………………….
  • Signature of the authorization documents from one parent or the holder of parental authority

Exclusion Criteria:

-History of neurological troubles, dysphasia, autistic spectrum disorder, intellectual disabilities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: semantic group
Half of the participants (named the "semantic group") perform a semantic categorisation task.
The "semantic task" has to categorise semantically (i.e., type of contexts or type of objects) one image at each trial.
Experimental: emotional group
Half of the participants (named the "emotional group") perform an emotional evaluation task.
The "emotional task" has to evaluate the emotional content (i.e., neutral, positive or negative) of one image at each trial.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1. Accuracy and response time at an explicit emotional evaluation task of visual scenes, by children with Attentional Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Time Frame: at baseline Day 0
The performance at the emotional evaluation task is analyzed by association of two separate outcomes measures: measure of efficiency by the accuracy (i.e. proportion of correct response) and measure of the effectiveness by the response time at the correct trials (in milliseconds). This experiment analyzed the explicit processing of visual scenes' emotional content .
at baseline Day 0
2. Accuracy and response time at a semantic categorization task of visual scenes, by children with Attentional Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Time Frame: at baseline Day 0
The performance at the semantic categorization task is analyzed by association of two separate outcomes measures: measure of efficiency by the accuracy (i.e. proportion of correct response) and measure of the effectiveness by the response time at the correct trials (in milliseconds). This experiment analyzed the implicit processing of visual scenes' emotional content .
at baseline Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion and response time of correct response for the contextual images compared to the local images at the semantic categorization task for ADHD's participants
Time Frame: at baseline Day 0
The performance is analyzed by association of two separate outcomes measures: measure of efficiency by the accuracy (i.e. proportion of correct response) and measure of the effectiveness by the response time at the correct trials (in milliseconds).
at baseline Day 0
Proportion and response time of correct response for the contextual images compared to the local images at the emotional evaluation task for ADHD's participants
Time Frame: at baseline Day 0
The performance is analyzed by association of two separate outcomes measures: measure of efficiency by the accuracy (i.e. proportion of correct response) and measure of the effectiveness by the response time at the correct trials (in milliseconds).
at baseline Day 0
Influence of the image's emotional content (i.e. neutral, positive or negative) on long term memory in ADHD participants
Time Frame: at 1 week from the first evaluation
The performance, in a two-alternative forced choice (2 AFC) image recognition, is analyzed by two separate outcomes measures: measure of efficiency by the accuracy (i.e. proportion of correct response) and measure of the effectiveness by the response time (in milliseconds).
at 1 week from the first evaluation
Performance on long term memory in ADHD participants
Time Frame: at 1 week from the first evaluation
The performance, in a two-alternative forced choice (2 AFC) image recognition, is analyzed by two separate outcomes measures: measure of efficiency by the accuracy (i.e. proportion of correct response) and measure of the effectiveness by the response time (in milliseconds).
at 1 week from the first evaluation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: FOSSOUD Catherine, MD, Fondation Lenval - Nice Children Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 11, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 11, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity

Clinical Trials on Semantic group

Subscribe