Neurocognitive Visual Reaction Training

February 17, 2016 updated by: Kevin Ray Ford, High Point University

Incorporating neurocognitive visual reaction training has been shown to increase bating performance in collegiate baseball players. However, poor methodology, such as lack of a control group and use of an unreliable outcome measure, limit the strength of the previous study. Therefore the purpose of this study is to determine the effects of neurocognitive visual reaction training on reaction time and coordination in an athletic population.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of neurocognitive visual reaction training on reaction time and coordination.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27262
        • Human Biomechanics and Physiology Laboratory

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • subjects that participate in a structured sport team
  • between the ages of 18-65
  • with or without a history of mild traumatic brain injury.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subjects currently under medical supervision and not fully cleared to participate in structured sport team.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Experimental: Reaction Time Training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of colored balls correctly identified
Time Frame: 5 weeks
5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of ball catches on alternate ball toss
Time Frame: 5 weeks
5 weeks
Reaction time on dynavision reaction board
Time Frame: 5 Weeks
5 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HBAPL-201309-191

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Reaction Time

Clinical Trials on Reaction Time Training

3
Subscribe