Tolerance of nHFPV Versus nCPAP in Neonatal Respiratory Distress (TONIPEP)

July 22, 2015 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

Tolerance of Nasal High Frequency Percussive Ventilation Versus Nasal CPAP in Neonatal Respiratory Distress in Term and Preterm (> 33 Weeks of Gestation) Neonates

Respiratory distress is the main cause of morbimortality in preterm and term neonates. In most of the case, these babies required the use of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) delivered by a non invasive device. Nasal continuous airway positive pressure (nCPAP) is widely used in neonatal intensive care unit. Nasal high frequency percussive ventilation (nHFPV) can be used as non invasive device to deliver PEEP, and improved lung clearance.

We hypothesized that nHFPV can be used to deliver PEEP in preterm and term newborn with respiratory distress with the same tolerance as nCPAP. To compare the tolerance of these devices we used cerebral tissue oxygenation (rSO2c) measured by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective is to compare nHFPV versus nCPAP tolerance for providing PEEP in newborn respiratory distress.

High frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) is a pressure limited, time-cycled, high-frequency mode of ventilation that delivers subphysiologic tidal volumes at rapid rates and that can be used via an endotracheal tube, a nasal probe or a face mask. In burned children, it has been shown to provide the same or improved oxygenation and ventilation at lower peak pressure when compared with conventional ventilation. In neonates, HFPV has been described in hyaline membrane disease and acute respiratory failure ventilation with improvement in oxygenation, significant decrease in PaCO2 and no change in central hemodynamics and we recently shown that nasal HFPV is more effective than nasal continuous positive airway pressure in transient tachypnea of the newborn. This stud is a cross-over clinical trial. For each patient enrolled, the 2 respiratory devices (nHFPV and nCPAP) were used one after the other for 15 minutes each. Randomization determines which device to use in first (group A nCPAP then nHFPV, group B (nHFPV then nCPAP). During the experiment, rSO2c is continuously recorded by NIRS, and oxygenation and capnia are monitored in a non invasive way by transcutaneous oxygen saturation and transcutaneous capnia measurement. Ventilators' setting (PEEP, FiO2) will be modified to achieve oxygen and capnia targets (SpO2 > 90%, and under 95% if FiO2>0.21, Capnia between 5 to 7 kPa). Duration of patient follow up is 30 minutes. After these 30 minutes, if PEEP is always needed, patients undergo nCPAP. If needed during the experiment, patients can receive mechanical ventilation (the criteria for mechanical ventilation are the same as those used in clinical practice).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • Recruiting
        • Service de Néonatalogie - Maternité - Hôpital Pellegrin
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Christophe ELLEAU, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Eric DUMAS DE LA ROQUE, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Olivier TANDONNET, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lorraine DELCROIX, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Laurent RENESME, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 30 minutes (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inborn neonate.
  • Delivered by vaginal delivery or caesarean section.
  • Gestational age greater than or equal to 33 weeks of gestation.
  • Birth weight > 1kg.
  • Respiratory distress with a Silverman score greater than or equal to 4 after 10 minutes of life.
  • Signed parental informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Meconium aspiration syndrome.
  • Congenital anomalies such as heart anomalies, congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation, diaphragmatic hernia…

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: nCPAP - nHFPV
Eligible patient received after randomization nCPAP or nHFPV for 15 minutes then after the 15 minutes, they received the seconde non invasive device for 15 minutes. Study end 30 minutes after randomization or before if mechanical ventilation is required.
Experimental: nHFPV - nCPAP
Eligible patient received after randomization nCPAP or nHFPV for 15 minutes then after the 15 minutes, they received the seconde non invasive device for 15 minutes. Study end 30 minutes after randomization or before if mechanical ventilation is required.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Measurement of cerebral tissue oxygenation (rSO2c) by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). We compared the mean of the variation of rSO2c during the last 5 minutes for each device (nHFPV and nCPAP).
Time Frame: 30 minutes after the inclusion
30 minutes after the inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Measurement of transcutaneous capnia and oxygen saturation; variation of heart rate, breath rate and blood pressure; ventilators' setting (PEEP, FiO2).
Time Frame: 30 minutes after the inclusion
30 minutes after the inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laurent RENESME, MD, University Hospital Bordeaux, France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 8, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 23, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neonatal Respiratory Distress

Clinical Trials on Nasal continuous airway positive pressure (nCPAP)

3
Subscribe