An Open Label Trial of Azithromycin in Chronic Productive Cough (AZCC)

February 17, 2016 updated by: University of Nottingham

We have noticed a group of patients presenting with a longstanding wet cough which has often been treated as asthma. The cough is productive of sputum which frequently contains bacteria, but does not resolve with standard antibiotic treatment.

A very similar cough is seen in subjects who smoke, have exposure to airbourne dusts or chemicals or have a condition known as bronchiectasis, but these problems have already been excluded.

We have found that prolonged treatment with an antibiotic called azithromycin is very effective but using azithromycin in this way is not licensed and there is currently no trial evidence to support its use.

This research will evaluate the clinical benefit of low dose azithromycin to determine if this is an effective and safe treatment for these patients. It will also involve a detailed investigation of these patients to determine whether they have enough in common to believe we are describing a new condition.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

We and others have observed a cohort of patients, mainly referred with either poorly controlled asthma despite high dose treatment or suspected bronchiectasis, who give a history of chronic (often 3 months or more) productive cough which improves with antibiotic treatment but quickly relapses. Most deny wheeze and on examination there are often transmitted sounds from mucus in the large airways but no expiratory wheeze typical of asthma. Investigations including spirometry, bronchial challenges, chest X-ray, screen for immunodeficiency and high resolution CT (HRCT) scan exclude recognised causes of productive cough but sputum culture is often positive for Haemophilus influenzae although sometimes demonstrates normal respiratory flora despite being markedly purulent.

Due to their efficacy in cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis we have empirically tried treatment with low dose macrolide antibiotics over 3-6 months often with dramatic benefit. This is however an unproven and unlicensed indication which needs to be more thoroughly evaluated.

The key objective of the study is to determine if 12 weeks treatment of patients with chronic productive cough with low dose azithromycin is both effective and safe.

The secondary objectives of the study are to describe the clinical and pathological features of a cohort of patients who present with chronic productive cough (with no evidence of bronchiectasis, smoking-related chronic bronchitis or immunodeficiency) to determine if these are sufficiently similar to justify a new diagnostic label.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nottinghamshire
      • Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom, NG5 1PB
        • Recruiting
        • Respiratory Research Unit
        • Contact:
          • Matthew Martin, MBChB
          • Phone Number: 01158231935
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tim Harrison, MD, FRCP
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Matthew Martin, MBChB MRCP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 and over
  • Male or female
  • Non-smokers for 10 years and <20 pack year equivalents in total
  • Persistent productive cough for > 3 months in duration
  • Use of effective contraception Acceptable contraceptive methods include: established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods; placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS); condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with spermicide; true abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant); or vasectomised partner.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of obvious inhaled irritant exposure
  • Evidence of primary or secondary immunodeficiency.
  • Clinically important bronchiectasis on HRCT scan
  • Prolonged QT interval on ECG or significant cardiac pathology prior to commencing azithromycin
  • Abnormal LFT's (greater than 2x upper limit of normal)
  • Hypersensitivity to azithromycin or any macrolide/ketolide antibiotic
  • Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant during course of study
  • Contra-indication to bronchoscopy (as per British Thoracic Society Guidelines)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Azithromycin
250mg azithromycin three times weekly for 12 weeks
250mg azithromycin three times per week for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Zithromax

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in cough on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score at week 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment started
12 weeks after treatment started

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in sputum colour (as per previously validated commercially available graded sputum colour chart) at week 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment started
12 weeks after treatment started
Change from baseline in exhaled nitric oxide level (ppm) at week 24
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment started
12 weeks after treatment started
Change from baseline in FEV1 (ml) at week 24
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment started
12 weeks after treatment started
Change from baseline in sputum volume (ml) at week 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment started
12 weeks after treatment started

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tim Harrison, MD, FRCP, University of Nottingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 22, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Cough

Clinical Trials on Azithromycin

Subscribe