- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02240095
Increasing Medical and Nursing Students Searching of Current Best Evidence to Answer Clinical Questions (MPFS-2)
Multifaceted Online Interventions to Increase Medical and Nursing Students Searching of Current Best Evidence to Answer Clinical Questions (MPFS-2)
Translation of new knowledge from research into evidence-informed health care is a shared obligation of the clinical and the scientific communities. Unfortunately, studies of quality of care continue to show that this goal is substantially unrealized. One main barrier is lack of quick and easy identification, appraisal and synthesis of current best evidence. This start with medical and nursing students, which have numerous clinical-related questions daily, but face a large volume of 3000 articles published every day, accessible in many scattered resources.
To address theses problems, McMaster's Health Information Research Unit (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) has developed and implemented "McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service Federated Search" (MPFS), an online search engine that provides a unique 1-stop search and organized access to current best evidence in daily practice. However additional barriers need to be overcome for students to actually search and use this evidence in their learning and practice. Theses include logistical barriers (time constraints, forgotten questions), as well as educational barriers (eg, lack of awareness of the "architecture" of evidence, limited searching skills, and lack of reference standards among peers for finding best evidence).
In a previous trial, the investigators tested 3 innovative online interventions among clinicians registered to MPFS to overcome these barriers and increase the quantity and quality of searching for current best evidence to answer clinical questions (NCT02038439). The investigators seek to conduct a second randomized trial testing the same 3 interventions, this time among medical and nursing students registered in MPFS.
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Rationale & Objectives
One main barrier to achieving evidence-informed care by clinicians is lack of quick and easy identification, appraisal and synthesis of current best evidence. Clinicians and students information needs are considerable - but about 3000 articles are published in Medline every day. Numerous evidence-based resources have been developed to filter and process the evidence, but although increasingly used, each offer a fragmented and scattered view of information, and none provides comprehensive topic coverage or satisfactory updating.
To address theses problems, McMaster's Health Information Research Unit (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) has developed and implemented "McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service Federated Search (MPFS)", an online search engine that provides a unique 1-stop search and organized access to current best evidence in daily practice. MPFS provides both alerts to users about new research, and a novel federated search function, with the particular feature of organizing information according to the "pyramid of evidence-based resources", with the most clinically applicable evidence at the top. Thus MPFS simultaneously retrieves evidence from Studies ("Medline", both filtered and unfiltered, at the bottom), then Systematic reviews; Synopses of studies and systematic reviews (selected for methodological rigor and clinical relevance), and, at the top level, online widely used Summaries (e.g."Best Practice").
Combining features of the current best evidence-based resources is not enough to increase access and use of current best evidence. Additional well-known barriers that need to be overcome include logistical barriers (time constraints, forgotten questions, and simplicity of using one single albeit limited resource), as well as educational barriers (eg, lack of awareness of the "architecture" of evidence and limits of other single resources, lack of knowledge and experience of what federated searches can offer, limited searching skills, and lack of reference standards among peers for finding best evidence).
Hypothesis
This trial seeks to test 3 innovative online interventions among medical and nursing students registered to MPFS to overcome these barriers and increase the quantity and quality of searching for current best evidence to answer the learning needs and clinical questions. These interventions build on effective models for the teaching of clinical skills at the point of care, so that they are facilitated in using the search engine as a clinical tool, and perceive evidence retrieval skills as true clinical skills.
Methods
- Study design: Randomized Factorial Controlled Trial.
- Setting and Participants: The trial will be conducted among medical and nursing students registered in MPFS and working in the teaching hospitals and clinics of McMaster University (see eligibility criteria below)
- Participating clinicians will be randomized to 3 online interventions (see description below) in a factorial design (A x B x C), whose permutation results in 8 allocation arms (A+B+C, A+B, A+C, B+C, A, B, C, no intervention, see details below)
- Randomization: will be computer-generated, and stratified for medical vs. nursing students. Registrants will be randomly allocated to each study arms. Allocation will be concealed from research staff.
- Blinding and control group: Although participants cannot be blinded to the interventions, they will not be told of the different features offered, and all will receive usual searching features of MPFS.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1
- McMaster University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All medical and nursing students currently registered for more than one month in the MPFS search engine,
- And learning in the teaching hospitals and clinics of the Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Registrants that are no longer working or training at McMaster University,
- Registrants that never logged in MPFS during the last 12 months counting back from the beginning of the trial.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Interventions: A + B + C
See Interventions Description. In this arm, students will be offered all 3 online interventions combined:
|
Students allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care.
The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
Students allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
Students allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
|
|
Experimental: Interventions A + B
See Interventions Description. In this arm, students will be offered the 2 following interventions combined:
|
Students allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care.
The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
Students allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
|
|
Experimental: Interventions A + C
In this arm, students will be offered the 2 following online interventions combined:
|
Students allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care.
The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
Students allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
|
|
Experimental: Interventions B + C
See Interventions Description. In this arm, students will be offered the 2 following online interventions combined:
|
Students allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
Students allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
|
|
Experimental: Intervention A alone
See Interventions Description. In this arm, students will be offered only the following intervention: * Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder |
Students allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care.
The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
|
|
Experimental: Intervention B alone
See Interventions Description. In this arm, students will be offered only the following intervention: * Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach |
Students allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
|
|
Experimental: Intervention C alone
See Interventions Description. In this arm, students will be offered only the following intervention: * Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback |
Students allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
|
|
No Intervention: No intervention
In this arm, students will be offered none of the 3 online interventions, but will just be using the usual features of the search engine available to all users.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Utilization of evidence-based resources on MPFS as measured by rate of searches/month/user
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Each students participating in the trial has a personal online account in MPFS.
When they are signed on their account, the system continuously tracks their searches and utilization of individual resources.
We will record their utilization over the full duration of the trial (6 months) and analyze it in the end.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Utility (satisfaction in meeting users' information needs) as assessed by the Impact Assessment Measure questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
|
This Impact Assessment Measure questionnaire will be sent to students after a random sample of searches and completed online for a random sample of searches.
|
6 months
|
|
Use (application of evidence in practice) as assessed by the Impact Assessment Measure questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
|
This Impact Assessment Measure questionnaire will be sent to students after a random sample of searches and completed online for a random sample of searches.
|
6 months
|
|
Perceived Usefulness in patient care and outcomes as assessed by the Impact Assessment Measure questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
|
This Impact Assessment Measure questionnaire will be sent to students after a random sample of searches and completed online for a random sample of searches.
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Thomas Agoritsas, MD, McMaster University
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- FRN86465-B
- FRN86465 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR))
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Medical and Nursing Students' Evidence Retrieval Skills
-
McMaster UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)CompletedPhysicians Evidence Retrieval SkillsCanada
-
University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaCompletedNursing Education | Education, Competency-Based | Education, Nursing Students | Active Learning Methods and Life-skills Education | Evidence Based Practice | Evidence Based Programs in Schools | Education Advancement | Evidence Based Nursing | Nursing Education in Evidence-Based PracticeItaly
-
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip FakultesiEnrolling by invitationNursing Education | Nursing Students | Clinical Practice | Evidence Based NursingTurkey
-
Gözde ÖZARAS ÖZNot yet recruitingMedication Administration Skills in Nursing Students
-
Sakarya UniversityNot yet recruitingEducation, Nursing | Clinical Competence | Evidence-Based Practice | Students, Nursing | Clinical Decision-Making in NursingTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical SciencesCompletedMedical Education | Nursing StudentsIran
-
Bartın UnıversityCompletedSimulation Training | Nursing Students | ECG | Simulation Based Learning | Nursing SkillsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityCompletedSocial Support | Clinical Competence | Objective Structured Clinical Examination | Students, Medical | Education, Medical, Undergraduate | Medical Students | Clinical Skills Education | Peer Support InterventionsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityDokuz Eylül University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination UnitNot yet recruitingVirtual Reality | Nursing Students | Breaking Bad News Skills
-
University of TripoliLibyan Red Crescent; Faculty of Medicine - University of Tripoli; Clinical Skills... and other collaboratorsCompletedDisaster Medicine Education and Preparedness Among Medical Students | Disaster Medicine Knowledge and Skills Training for Pre-clinical Medical Students | Disaster and Emergency Medicine Education and Preparedness Among Pre-clinical Medical StudentsLibya
Clinical Trials on Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
-
McMaster UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)CompletedPhysicians Evidence Retrieval SkillsCanada
-
Ka YanRadboud University, The NetherlandsCompleted
-
Ignacio Zaragoza GarcíaHospital Universitario 12 de OctubreCompletedInfection Control | Preventive MeasuresSpain
-
Clinica Gema LeonCompletedChild Development DisorderSpain
-
Canterbury Christ Church UniversityBarts & The London NHS Trust; Betsi Cadwaladr University Health BoardRecruitingType 1 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)United Kingdom
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruitingParental Support | Preschool Children's Health BehaviorsChina
-
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Massachusetts General Hospital; University of...CompletedFood PreferencesUnited States
-
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyRecruitingCancer | Palliative CareRomania
-
Fundacion para la Investigacion y Formacion en...RecruitingPrimary Care | Family Medicine | Clinical UltrasoundSpain
-
Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiCompletedCardiovascular DiseasesGreece