Increasing Medical and Nursing Students Searching of Current Best Evidence to Answer Clinical Questions (MPFS-2)

October 23, 2017 updated by: McMaster University

Multifaceted Online Interventions to Increase Medical and Nursing Students Searching of Current Best Evidence to Answer Clinical Questions (MPFS-2)

Translation of new knowledge from research into evidence-informed health care is a shared obligation of the clinical and the scientific communities. Unfortunately, studies of quality of care continue to show that this goal is substantially unrealized. One main barrier is lack of quick and easy identification, appraisal and synthesis of current best evidence. This start with medical and nursing students, which have numerous clinical-related questions daily, but face a large volume of 3000 articles published every day, accessible in many scattered resources.

To address theses problems, McMaster's Health Information Research Unit (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) has developed and implemented "McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service Federated Search" (MPFS), an online search engine that provides a unique 1-stop search and organized access to current best evidence in daily practice. However additional barriers need to be overcome for students to actually search and use this evidence in their learning and practice. Theses include logistical barriers (time constraints, forgotten questions), as well as educational barriers (eg, lack of awareness of the "architecture" of evidence, limited searching skills, and lack of reference standards among peers for finding best evidence).

In a previous trial, the investigators tested 3 innovative online interventions among clinicians registered to MPFS to overcome these barriers and increase the quantity and quality of searching for current best evidence to answer clinical questions (NCT02038439). The investigators seek to conduct a second randomized trial testing the same 3 interventions, this time among medical and nursing students registered in MPFS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Rationale & Objectives

    One main barrier to achieving evidence-informed care by clinicians is lack of quick and easy identification, appraisal and synthesis of current best evidence. Clinicians and students information needs are considerable - but about 3000 articles are published in Medline every day. Numerous evidence-based resources have been developed to filter and process the evidence, but although increasingly used, each offer a fragmented and scattered view of information, and none provides comprehensive topic coverage or satisfactory updating.

    To address theses problems, McMaster's Health Information Research Unit (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) has developed and implemented "McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service Federated Search (MPFS)", an online search engine that provides a unique 1-stop search and organized access to current best evidence in daily practice. MPFS provides both alerts to users about new research, and a novel federated search function, with the particular feature of organizing information according to the "pyramid of evidence-based resources", with the most clinically applicable evidence at the top. Thus MPFS simultaneously retrieves evidence from Studies ("Medline", both filtered and unfiltered, at the bottom), then Systematic reviews; Synopses of studies and systematic reviews (selected for methodological rigor and clinical relevance), and, at the top level, online widely used Summaries (e.g."Best Practice").

    Combining features of the current best evidence-based resources is not enough to increase access and use of current best evidence. Additional well-known barriers that need to be overcome include logistical barriers (time constraints, forgotten questions, and simplicity of using one single albeit limited resource), as well as educational barriers (eg, lack of awareness of the "architecture" of evidence and limits of other single resources, lack of knowledge and experience of what federated searches can offer, limited searching skills, and lack of reference standards among peers for finding best evidence).

  2. Hypothesis

    This trial seeks to test 3 innovative online interventions among medical and nursing students registered to MPFS to overcome these barriers and increase the quantity and quality of searching for current best evidence to answer the learning needs and clinical questions. These interventions build on effective models for the teaching of clinical skills at the point of care, so that they are facilitated in using the search engine as a clinical tool, and perceive evidence retrieval skills as true clinical skills.

  3. Methods

    1. Study design: Randomized Factorial Controlled Trial.
    2. Setting and Participants: The trial will be conducted among medical and nursing students registered in MPFS and working in the teaching hospitals and clinics of McMaster University (see eligibility criteria below)
    3. Participating clinicians will be randomized to 3 online interventions (see description below) in a factorial design (A x B x C), whose permutation results in 8 allocation arms (A+B+C, A+B, A+C, B+C, A, B, C, no intervention, see details below)
    4. Randomization: will be computer-generated, and stratified for medical vs. nursing students. Registrants will be randomly allocated to each study arms. Allocation will be concealed from research staff.
    5. Blinding and control group: Although participants cannot be blinded to the interventions, they will not be told of the different features offered, and all will receive usual searching features of MPFS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

960

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1
        • McMaster University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All medical and nursing students currently registered for more than one month in the MPFS search engine,
  • And learning in the teaching hospitals and clinics of the Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Registrants that are no longer working or training at McMaster University,
  • Registrants that never logged in MPFS during the last 12 months counting back from the beginning of the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interventions: A + B + C

See Interventions Description. In this arm, students will be offered all 3 online interventions combined:

  • Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
  • Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach
  • Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback
Students allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care. The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
Students allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
Students allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
Experimental: Interventions A + B

See Interventions Description. In this arm, students will be offered the 2 following interventions combined:

  • Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
  • Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach
Students allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care. The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
Students allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
Experimental: Interventions A + C

In this arm, students will be offered the 2 following online interventions combined:

  • Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder
  • Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback
Students allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care. The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
Students allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
Experimental: Interventions B + C

See Interventions Description. In this arm, students will be offered the 2 following online interventions combined:

  • Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach
  • Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback
Students allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
Students allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
Experimental: Intervention A alone

See Interventions Description. In this arm, students will be offered only the following intervention:

* Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder

Students allocated to this intervention will receive access to an online recorder for the clinical questions at the point of care. The recorder is accessible across a wide range of devices including phones, tablets, and desktop computers.
Experimental: Intervention B alone

See Interventions Description. In this arm, students will be offered only the following intervention:

* Intervention B - Online Evidence Retrieval Coach

Students allocated to this intervention will receive online guidance, embedded in the MPFS search engine, in the form of short videos, animations, demos and tips and tricks regarding evidence retrieval.
Experimental: Intervention C alone

See Interventions Description. In this arm, students will be offered only the following intervention:

* Intervention C - Online Audit and Feedback

Students allocated to this intervention will receive feedback on their current search performance compared to their peers, both online when using MPFS as well as by e-mail.
No Intervention: No intervention
In this arm, students will be offered none of the 3 online interventions, but will just be using the usual features of the search engine available to all users.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Utilization of evidence-based resources on MPFS as measured by rate of searches/month/user
Time Frame: 6 months
Each students participating in the trial has a personal online account in MPFS. When they are signed on their account, the system continuously tracks their searches and utilization of individual resources. We will record their utilization over the full duration of the trial (6 months) and analyze it in the end.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Utility (satisfaction in meeting users' information needs) as assessed by the Impact Assessment Measure questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
This Impact Assessment Measure questionnaire will be sent to students after a random sample of searches and completed online for a random sample of searches.
6 months
Use (application of evidence in practice) as assessed by the Impact Assessment Measure questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
This Impact Assessment Measure questionnaire will be sent to students after a random sample of searches and completed online for a random sample of searches.
6 months
Perceived Usefulness in patient care and outcomes as assessed by the Impact Assessment Measure questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
This Impact Assessment Measure questionnaire will be sent to students after a random sample of searches and completed online for a random sample of searches.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Agoritsas, MD, McMaster University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 22, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 22, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FRN86465-B
  • FRN86465 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR))

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medical and Nursing Students' Evidence Retrieval Skills

Clinical Trials on Intervention A - Online Clinical Questions Recorder

Subscribe