- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02261467
A Safety and Efficacy Study of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Forehead and Glabellar Facial Rhytides
December 18, 2018 updated by: Allergan
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Treatment With BOTOX® (Botulinum Toxin Type A) Purified Neurotoxin Complex for Subjects With Forehead and Glabellar Facial Rhytides
This is a safety and efficacy study of onabotulinumtoxinA in subjects with forehead and glabellar facial rhytides (frown lines).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
421
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E1
- Dr. Shannon Humphrey, Inc.
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E1
- Carruthers Dermatology Centre
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E1
- Jean Carruthers Cosmetic Dermatology
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5R 3N8
- Sweat Clinics of Canada
-
-
Quebec
-
Westmount, Quebec, Canada, H3Z 1B7
- Arthur Swift Research, Inc.
-
-
-
-
-
Dublin, Ireland
- Aesthetic Surgery Ireland
-
Dublin, Ireland
- Beacon Face and Dermatology Clinic
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35205
- Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center, PC
-
-
Arizona
-
Glendale, Arizona, United States, 85308
- Advanced Research Associates
-
-
California
-
Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
- Clinical Science Institute
-
-
Colorado
-
Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States, 80111
- About Skin Dermatology and DermSurgery, PC
-
-
Florida
-
Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33431
- Steven Fagien, MD, PA
-
-
Indiana
-
Carmel, Indiana, United States, 46032
- Laser & Skin Surgery Center of Indiana
-
-
Louisiana
-
Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70006
- Coleman Center For Cosmetic Dermatologic Surgery
-
-
Michigan
-
West Bloomfield, Michigan, United States, 48322
- Henry Ford Medical Center
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97210
- NW Dermatology and Research Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Moderate to severe forehead and glabellar lines
- Willing to have facial photos taken
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior exposure to botulinum toxin of any serotype for any indication
- Anticipated need for treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype for any indication during the study, other than study treatment
- Diagnosis of myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- Any facial resurfacing laser or light treatment, microdermabrasion, or superficial peels in the past 3 months
- Any medium depth or deep depth facial chemical peels; facial skin resurfacing; or permanent facial make-up in the past 6 months
- Any nonpermanent soft tissue fillers, or treatment with oral retinoids in the past year
- Prior face lift, thread lift, eyebrow lift, or related procedures (eg, eyelid and/or eyebrow surgery)
- Prior facial treatment with permanent soft tissue fillers, synthetic implants (eg, Gore-Tex®), and/or fat transplantation
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: OnabotulinumtoxinA
OnabotulinumtoxinA injected into the protocol-specified areas on Day 1. Subjects will receive at least 1 and up to 3 treatments.
|
OnabotulinumtoxinA injected into the protocol-specified areas.
Subjects will receive at least 1 and up to 3 treatments.
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA in Period 2
Placebo (normal saline) injected into the protocol-specified areas on Day 1.
If the subject meets the re-treatment criteria in Period 2, the subject will receive up to 2 open-label treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA into the protocol-specified areas.
|
Placebo (normal saline) injected into the protocol-specified areas on Day 1.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Subjects With ≥2-Grade Improvement From Baseline on Both the Investigator's and Subject's Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) Ratings of Forehead Line Severity at Maximum Eyebrow Elevation
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 30
|
The Investigator and subject each assessed the severity of the subject's forehead lines at maximum eyebrow elevation using the 4-grade FWS, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe.
The percentage of subjects with at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline assessed by both the Investigator and the subject are reported.
|
Baseline, Day 30
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Subjects With an Investigator Rating of None or Mild on the 4-Grade FWS for Forehead Line Severity at Maximum Eyebrow Elevation
Time Frame: Day 30
|
The Investigator assessed the severity of the subject's forehead lines at maximum eyebrow elevation using the 4-grade FWS, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe.
The percentage of subjects with a score of "none" and "mild" are reported.
|
Day 30
|
Percentage of Subjects With ≥1-Grade Improvement From Baseline on the Investigator's FWS Rating of Forehead Line Severity at Rest
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 30
|
The Investigator assessed the severity of the subject's forehead lines at rest using the 4-grade FWS, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe.
The percentage of subjects with at least a 1-grade improvement assessed by the Investigator are reported.
|
Baseline, Day 30
|
Percentage of Subjects Reporting Mostly Satisfied or Very Satisfied on the 5-Point Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) Item 5
Time Frame: Day 60
|
The FLSQ consists of 13 questions that assess subject satisfaction and appearance-related impacts associated with facial lines.
Item 5 on the FLSQ asks "How satisfied are you with the effect your treatment had on your facial lines?"
Responses included: very satisfied, mostly satisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, mostly dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied.
The percentage of subjects reporting a score of mostly satisfied or very satisfied with treatment are reported.
|
Day 60
|
Percentage of Subjects With ≥20-Point Improvement From Baseline on the Impact Domain of the FLSQ Among Subjects With Baseline Score ≥ 20 Points
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 30
|
The FLSQ consists of 13 questions that assess subject satisfaction and appearance-related impacts associated with facial lines.
The Impact Domain measures the subject's appearance-related and emotional impacts of treatment and is composed of 5 questions with a possible range of scores from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), using a transformed scale.
Only subjects with baseline scores ≥ 20 are included in the analysis.
|
Baseline, Day 30
|
Percentage of Subjects With a ≥3-Point Improvement From Baseline on Item 4 of the 11-Point Facial Line Outcomes (FLO-11) Questionnaire©
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 30
|
The FLO-11 assess the subject's psychological and appearance-related impacts associated with facial lines.
Item 4 is "I look older than my actual age because of my facial lines" with a range of possible scores from 0 = not at all to 10 = very much.
Only subjects with baseline scores ≥ 3 are included in the analysis.
|
Baseline, Day 30
|
Time to Retreatment Eligibility
Time Frame: 12 Months
|
Time to retreatment eligibility is defined as the number of days from treatment cycle 1 injection to the return to an Investigator FWS rating of moderate or severe at maximum eyebrow elevation.
The FWS is a 4-grade scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe.
Only subjects who achieved a ≥ 2-grade improvement on both the Investigator and subject FWS ratings at maximum eyebrow elevation on Day 30 are included in the analysis.
|
12 Months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 21, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 4, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
April 26, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 7, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
October 10, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 8, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 18, 2018
Last Verified
December 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 191622-142
- 2014-001860-36 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Glabellar Rhytides
-
Mentor Worldwide, LLCSynteract, Inc.CompletedGlabellar RhytidesUnited States
-
AllerganCompleted
-
Mentor Worldwide, LLCQuintiles, Inc.CompletedGlabellar RhytidesUnited States
-
Mentor Worldwide, LLCSynteract, Inc.CompletedGlabellar Rhytides | Frown Lines Between the EyebrowsUnited States
-
AllerganCompletedFacial Rhytides | Glabellar RhytidesUnited States, Belgium, Germany, United Kingdom
-
AllerganCompletedGlabellar Frown Lines | Facial RhytidesCanada
-
Mohamed Hayder Oleish SalihCompletedGlabellar Frown Lines | Wrinkle | Facial Expression | RhytidesEgypt
-
AllerganCompletedGlabellar Lines | Crow's Feet Lines | Facial RhytidesGermany, Canada, United States, France
-
AllerganCompletedGlabellar Lines | Crow's Feet Lines | Facial RhytidesGermany, Canada, United States, France
-
AllerganCompletedGlabellar Lines | Nasolabial Fold | Crow's Feet Lines | Facial RhytidesUnited States
Clinical Trials on OnabotulinumtoxinA
-
AllerganCompletedGlabellar Lines | Crow's Feet Lines | Facial RhytidesGermany, Canada, United States, France
-
AllerganCompletedGlabellar Lines | Crow's Feet Lines | Facial RhytidesGermany, Canada, United States, France
-
Northwell HealthWithdrawn
-
Henry Ford Health SystemActive, not recruitingGlabellar Frown LinesUnited States
-
Buddhist Tzu Chi General HospitalCompleted
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of Alabama at Birmingham and other collaboratorsRecruitingOveractive Bladder | Urinary Incontinence in Old Age | Urgency Urinary IncontinenceUnited States
-
Seoul National University HospitalIpsen; Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul, KoreaCompletedCervical DystoniaKorea, Republic of
-
Universita di VeronaMarialuisa GandolfiUnknown
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of University of...Not yet recruiting
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedCovid-19 | Bleeding | Thromboembolic EventsSweden