Eribulin Plus Gemcitabine (EG) vs Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (PG) in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (EG_PG)

July 12, 2020 updated by: Kyung Hae Jung, Asan Medical Center

A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Eribulin Plus Gemcitabine (EG) vs.Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (PG) in Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer as First -Line Chemotherapy

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an incurable disease and is needed to improve effective chemotherapy. Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine (PG) combination chemotherapy is one of the preferred chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with MBC, and was found to be proper as a maintenance chemotherapy regimen with survival benefit and feasible toxicity profile as shown in a large phase III KCSG (Korean Cancer Study Group) study (Park Y et al. J Clin Oncol 31(14):1732, 2013).

Eribulin mesylate is a microtubule-targeting agent that showed improved overall survival benefit as monotherapy for MBC patients as a new chemotherapeutic agent after failure of anthracycline and taxane in EMBRACE study (Cortes J et. al. Lancet 377:914-923, 2011). Eribulin was also reported its promising efficacy in another randomized phase III study that demonstrated eribulin as efficacious as capecitabine (Kaufman P et. al. Abstr# S6-6, SABCS 2012). Both study results showed potential clinical benefit in patients with triple negative MBC (TNBC). Thus, eribulin combined with gemcitabine may be a new potential regimen for early line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Furthermore, eribulin may have rational benefit compared with paclitaxel in terms of neurotoxicity. Although there is no direct evidence that eribulin has better neurotoxicity profile than taxane, eribulin tended to show less neurotoxicity compared with ixabepilone in a phase II trial (Vahdat, L et al. 2011 SABCS). Eribulin has no worsen toxicity as compared to paclitaxel. Therefore, EG may have less neurotoxicity comparing to PG.

In phase I trial, eribulin in combination with gemcitabine was feasible in patients with advanced solid tumor treated with chemotherapy (< 3 lines) (Goel R, et al, 2009 ASCO).

Based on this rationale, the investigators are to conduct randomized phase II study comparing EG chemotherapy with PG chemotherapy for patients with HER-2 negative MBC as first-line chemotherapy.

A total of 118 patients will be recruited. Patients will be randomized to a treatment arm by permutated method. The randomization ratio is 1:1. This study is multi-center, randomized, open label study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

A total of enrolled 118 patients in EG and PG groups, will be provided chemotherapy regimen:

Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine (PG) : every 3 weeks D1 Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 + D5W 500mL MIV over 3hrs before gemcitabine administration D1, D8 Gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 + NormalSaline 100ml MIV over 30mins

  • Pre & Post medication (which can be changed according to institutions' policy) D1 Corticosteroid 100 mg i.v. 30 min. before Paclitaxel Pheniramine 1A + D5W 50mL MIV 30mins before Paclitaxel Ranitidine 50mg IV + D5W 50mL MIV 30mins before Paclitaxel HT3 antagonist 1A + D5W 50 mL MIV 30mins before Paclitaxel

Eribulin/Gemcitabine (EG): every 3weeks D1, D8 Eribulin 1.0 mg/m2, 2-5min iv before gemcitabine (or miv with NormalSaline 100ml in max.) D1, D8 Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 + NormalSaline100ml MIV over 30mins

<schedule of Assessment adn procedures (±3 days window period ) >

  1. screening /baseline

    • obtaining Informed consent form
    • collecting information
    • demographic data
    • breast cancer treatment history/ medical history
    • general physical examination/ vital sign & Performance status
    • Test: CBC/blood chemistry/ Tumor response(CT or MRI)/
    • collecting QOL questionnaire using FACT-Taxane
  2. cycle 1 ~ prior to EOT

    • general physical examination/ vital sign & Performance status
    • Test: CBC/blood chemistry/ Tumor response(CT or MRI)
    • collecting QOL questionnaire using FACT-Taxane
    • administration PG or EG
  3. EOT(end of treatment)

    • general physical examination/ vital sign & Performance status
    • Test: CBC/blood chemistry/ Tumor response(CT or MRI)
    • collecting QOL questionnaire using FACT-Taxane
  4. survival follow up(every 12weeks)

    • survival
    • anti neoplastic therapy after end of treatment
    • The tumor response will be performed every 12 (±2) weeks until disease progression

<WITHDRAWAL OF SUBJECTS>

Subjects may be withdrawn from the study (i.e. from any further study medication or study procedure) for the following reasons:

  • At their own request
  • If, in the investigator's opinion, continuation in the study would be detrimental to the subject's well-being
  • In case of disease progression
  • In case of unacceptable toxicity

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
        • Asan Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically confirmed metastatic, or recurrent breast cancer
  2. HER2-negative breast cancer
  3. age > 18 years
  4. ECOG performance status 0 - 2
  5. Pre- or postmenopausal breast cancer patients with measurable or non-measurable lesions, who are candidates for chemotherapy
  6. Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
  7. No prior history of chemotherapy for metastatic, recurrent breast cancer
  8. Patients may have received prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant taxane regimen as long as it has been 12 months since completion of regimen.
  9. Patients either may or may not have a prior anthracycline containing regimen.
  10. Prior hormonal therapy as a treatment of metastatic disease is allowed. But antitumoral hormonal therapy must be terminated prior to enrollment(up to the date of randomization)
  11. Prior radiation therapy allowed as long as < 25% of the bone marrow has been treated, and the patients must have recovered from the acute toxic effects of the treatment prior to study enrollment. Prior radiation to the whole pelvis is not allowed. Prior radiotherapy must be completed 2 weeks before study entry.
  12. Bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone metastases should not be initiated following the first dose of randomized therapy. It must be initiated prior to day of treatment (cycle 1, day 1). Patients may continue on bisphosphonates who already established on bisphosphonate therapy for bone metastases
  13. Adequate bone marrow function (≥ ANC 1,500/ul, ≥ platelet 100,000/ul, ≥ Hemoglobin 9.0 g/dl)
  14. Adequate renal function (≤ serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dl or CCr ≥ 50 ml/min)
  15. Adequate liver function (≤ serum bilirubin 1.5 mg/dl, ≤ AST & ALTX3 upper normal limit or AST and ALT ≤ 5.0XULN if judged by the investigator to be related to liver metastases)
  16. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Serious uncontrolled intercurrent infections
  2. Serious intercurrent medical or psychiatric illness, including active cardiac disease
  3. Pregnancy or breast feeding
  4. Second primary malignancy(except in situ carcinoma of the cervix or adequately treated nonmelanomatous carcinoma of the skin or other malignancy treated at least 5 years previously with no evidence of recurrence)
  5. Documented parenchymal or leptomeningeal brain metastasis
  6. Peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2
  7. Prior treatment with gemcitabine will not be allowed.
  8. HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer and concomitant trastuzumab treatment is not allowed
  9. Women of childbearing potential, unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception during the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Paclitaxel & Gemcitabine(PG)
Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 IV , Day1,every 3weeks Gemcitabine 1250mg/m2 IV ,Day1& Day8 every 3weeks
175mg/m2 + D5W 500mL MIV over 3hrs before gemcitabine administration
Other Names:
  • Genexol,
PG:1250mg/m2 + NS 100ml MIV over 30mins EG:1000mg/m2 + NS 100ml MIV over 30mins
Other Names:
  • Gemcit
Experimental: Eribulin & Gemcitabine(EG)
Eribulin 1.0 mg/m2, 2-5min iv ,Day1& Day8 every 3weeks Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 ,Day1& Day8 every 3weeks
PG:1250mg/m2 + NS 100ml MIV over 30mins EG:1000mg/m2 + NS 100ml MIV over 30mins
Other Names:
  • Gemcit
1.0 mg/m2, 2-5min iv before gemcitabine (or miv with NS 100ml in max.)
Other Names:
  • Halaven,

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival
Time Frame: 48months
To demonstrate that EG is not inferior to PG group in terms of PFS in patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer as first-line treatment.
48months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: 48months
Survival will be measured as the time from randomization to the date of death.
48months
neuropathic scale
Time Frame: expected at 9week , expected at 24week
FACT for Taxane QOL assessment
expected at 9week , expected at 24week
toxicity of study drugs
Time Frame: from first administration until 28 days after the last dose administration
Using CTCAE Version 4.0
from first administration until 28 days after the last dose administration
duration of response
Time Frame: 48months
using RECIEST version 1.1
48months
objective response rate
Time Frame: 48months
using RECIEST version 1.1
48months
clinical benefit rate
Time Frame: 48months
using RECIEST version 1.1
48months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kyung Hae Jung, Dr, Asan Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 19, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 17, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Paclitaxel

3
Subscribe