Early-Phase Safety of Proton Therapy Equipment

November 28, 2016 updated by: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

A Study of the Early-Phase Safety of Proton Therapy Equipment for Patients Suffering From Solid Cancers, and the Equipment's Operational Effectiveness.

The main purpose of this study is to collect the safety data of Sumitomo Heavy Industries' proton therapy equipment for the treatment of solid cancer patients in Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, including the patients' early-stage adverse reactions and the efficacy on tumors, as well as to assess the operating functionality of the proton therapy system.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main purpose of this study is to collect the safety data of Sumitomo Heavy Industries' proton therapy equipment for the treatment of solid cancer patients in Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, including the patients' early-stage adverse reactions and the efficacy on tumors, as well as to assess the operating functionality of the proton therapy system.

In this study, solid cancer subjects will be treated with Sumitomo's proton therapy system. Safety and operating functionality data will be collected during the treatment and following-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taoyuan, Taiwan
        • ChangGungMH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who are pathologically confirmed to be suffering from solid cancer or brain tumor
  2. Subjects who are measurable or with disease that is evaluable
  3. Subjects who are expected to survive for at least 90 days
  4. Subjects who did not receive any treatment that may affect this treatment (such as PEI, TAE) 4 weeks before they are chosen to receive this treatment
  5. ECOG Performance Status (ECOG PS): 0, 1 or 2
  6. Patients who can cooperate with the treatment requirements and maintain the gestures required during the irradiation process
  7. Patients with well functioning main organs
  8. The subject retained main organ functions.
  9. The subject age is between 20-75 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who once received radiotherapy on the area planned to be irradiated
  2. Subjects whose irradiated area has active or persistent infectious disease
  3. Pregnant or possibly pregnant subjects
  4. Subjects with other serious complications
  5. Subjects who are judged by the Principle Investigator (or co-principle investigator) as unsuitable or because of other reasons described above
  6. The subject has the radiotherapy contraindication
  7. Breast feeding
  8. All the subjects have no plan to conception during the treatment and within one year after treatment
  9. Subject who has any electronic devices in the body which could be affected by radiotherapy and has chance to cause accident. For example: pacemaker, artificial heart, brain and spinal cord stimulation, semi-implantable and implantable electrical stimulation、artificial inner ear ...etc

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: safety
proton therapy
proton therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate and Severity of Adverse Reactions
Time Frame: Average 90 days after treatment.
After enrollment, each patient has to receive physical examination, laboratory tests, and image studies as baseline. During the course of radiotherapy, patients will have weekly evaluations in physicals and laboratory tests. Image studies are optional during treatment. In the follow-up periods, monthly exams, including regular physicals, markers in serum and urine and image studies to evaluation treatment responses, will be scheduled till 90 days after the end of treatment.
Average 90 days after treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of System Errors
Time Frame: Average 100 days after treatment.
During treatment, the frequency of operation of the system error will be recorded and analyzed to see if the system can run smoothly.
Average 100 days after treatment.
Percentage of Each Target Lesion Evaluation Types.(1)Complete Response(2)Partial Response,(3)Progressive Disease,(4)Stable Disease,(5) Inevaluable
Time Frame: Average 100 days after treatment.
Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors:(1)complete Response(CR),Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm (2)Partial Response(PR), At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. (3)Progressive Disease(PD), At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (4)Stable Disease(SD), Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. (5) Inevaluable (NE), Inevaluable for response: specify reasons (for example: early death, malignant disease; toxicity; tumor assessments not repeated/incomplete; other (specify).
Average 100 days after treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ji-Hong Hong, Ph.D., Vice-President

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on proton therapy

3
Subscribe