Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Irradiation With Hyaluronic Acid (RPAH2)

March 2, 2022 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Moderate Hypofractionated Radiotherapy (62 Gy in 20 Fractions of 3.1 Gy) Versus Stereotactic Radiotherapy (37.5 Gy in 5 Fractions of 7.5 Gy) With Hyaluronic Acid Injection Between the Prostate and the Rectum for Prostate Cancer of Low- to Intermediate Risk; RPAH2

The present randomized, open, multicentric Phase II trial, in parallel groups with two arms of treatment, compares the treatment A, moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy of 62Gy, to treatment B, stereotactic irradiation of 37.5 Gy with hyaluronic acid injection in the space between the prostate and the rectum to preserve the rectal-wall from high doses of irradiation. The study aims to assess the rates of late urinary toxicities of grade ≥ 2 induced by a moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy (62Gy in 20 fractions of 3.1Gy) and by a stereotactic radiotherapy (37.5Gy in 5 fractions of 7.5Gy), and the rectal toxicities after an injection of hyaluronic acid between the rectal wall and the prostate.

Ninety-six patients and 9 centers are included in the protocol.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Albi, France, 81000
        • Clinique Claude Bernard Service de radiothérapie CMCO Claude Bernard
      • Dijon, France, 21079
        • Centre Georges François Leclerc
      • Marseille, France, 13009
        • Institut Paoli Calmettes
      • Nantes, France, 44805
        • Site Hospitalier Nord Boulevard Jacques Monod
      • Pierre-Bénite, France, 69495
        • Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
      • St Etienne, France, 42270
        • Institut de Cancerologie de La Loire
      • Toulouse, France, 31300
        • Groupe ONCORAD Clinique Pasteur

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age superior or equal to 18 years and inferior to 80 years.
  • patient with a low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer, according to D'Amico classification, for an exclusive irradiation.
  • prostate cancer histologically proven.
  • performance index OMS (World Health Organization) of grade 0-2.
  • indication of external beam radiotherapy validate by the medical commission of the institution.
  • IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score < 15/35 (without alpha-blocker).
  • the signed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rectal surgery antecedents.
  • prostate resection less than 6 mois.
  • Involvement of the seminal vesicles or of the capsule on MRI.
  • patient who can't cooperate during the treatment.
  • pelvic irradiation antecedents.
  • antecedents of inflammatory intestinal pathologies.
  • neoplasia.
  • patients treated with anti-neoplastic or anti-angiogenic or with other treatments used in rheumatology and which may include methotrexate (in order not to have a radiosensitizing effect).
  • patients receiving anticoagulant treatment.
  • other undergoing study that may interfere with the present study.
  • patient under legal protection measure.
  • hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid.
  • patient with auto-immune disease.
  • patient receiving immunosuppressive medication.
  • severe allergies.
  • history of endocarditis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Moderate Hypofractionated radiotherapy (62Gy)
20 fractions of 3.1Gy
Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy of 62Gy in 20 fraction of 3.1Gy.
Experimental: Stereotactic radiotherapy (37.5Gy)
5 fractions of 7.5Gy)
Stereotactic radiotherapy of 37.5Gy in 5 fraction of 7.5Gy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with late urinary toxicities of grade ≥ 2 after moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy (62Gy in 20 fractions of 3.1Gy) and after stereotactic radiotherapy (37.5Gy in 5 fractions of 7.5Gy).
Time Frame: Follow-up at ≥ 3 months after the radiotherapy and up to 3 years.
Late urinary toxicities of grade ≥ 2 assessed using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects ( CTCAE) v 4.0 classification from 3 months to 3 years.
Follow-up at ≥ 3 months after the radiotherapy and up to 3 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival rates without biological relapse in both arms.
Time Frame: 3 years.
Survival rates without biological relapse (increase of the PSA (prostate-specific antigen) beyond nadir + 2 ng/ml, using Phoenix definition).
3 years.
Evaluation and comparison of the acute urinary and rectal toxicities in both arms.
Time Frame: 3 months: evaluation at 3 months.
all toxicities will be listed using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) v4.0.
3 months: evaluation at 3 months.
Evaluation and comparison of the sexual preservation rates in both arms.
Time Frame: 3 years.
evaluation and comparison of the sexual preservation rates in both arms using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF).
3 years.
Late rectal toxicities in both arms, for the evaluation of the hyaluronic acid efficacy to preserve the rectal wall in both approaches.
Time Frame: 3 years.
Late rectal toxicities in both arms, for the evaluation of the hyaluronic acid efficacy to preserve the rectal wall in both approaches, using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) 4.0.
3 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostatic Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy

Subscribe