Late-term Effects of Hypofractionated Chest Wall and Regional Nodal Irradiation in Patients With Breast Cancer (LEHR)

Dept. of Radiation Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh

Survival of breast cancer patients has improved with multimodality treatment. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) is rapidly emerging as one of the options for breast cancer patients after breast conservation surgery (BCS) but data on postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) with hypofractionation is lacking and there is always concern for the late effects of RT especially with regional nodal irradiation (RNI). The potential survival benefits of locoregional radiation needs to be balanced with late-term effects. There is a dearth of data on RNI with hypofractionation. Therefore, reporting late-term effects of radiation in these patients is of utmost importance, especially with hypofractionation. Very few patients were given PMRT or RNI in the START trials, so definitive conclusions about the safety of shorter fractionation RNI cannot be drawn from these studies.1-3 There are also studies from Canada and the US with similar dose fractionations in the PMRT setting with limited number of patients but without RNI.4,5 There is a world-wide need for data on PMRT and especially with RNI for patients with breast cancer with its late-term consequences. Because of this, many radiation oncology societies are hesitant in recommending hypofractionated RNI. It is also an area for potential research in breast cancer radiotherapy. We have published our clinical outcomes with 3 weeks of adjuvant local and RNI with hypofractionation in the past.6-10 In this study, we will report late-term effects of PMRT and RNI with this schedule in patients with stage II and III breast cancer from a single institute from India which is practicing hypofractionation since 1976.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Late Effects of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer
• Intervention / Treatment: Radiation: Hypofractionated radiotherapy

Detailed Description

Between January 1990 to December 2007, women with breast cancer who were given radical treatment with mastectomy, systemic therapy and RT at least 10 years ago were included. Eligible patients were recruited from the radiotherapy department record and these were on regular follow-up in the breast clinic. The study was approved by the departmental ethics committee. Clinical, pathological and treatment characteristics were taken from the patient file. Inclusion criteria were: female patients age ≥18 years of age, with invasive carcinoma of the breast, post mastectomy, complete microscopic excision of primary tumour and stage II or III disease treated with locoregional RT. Exclusion criteria were: breast conserving surgery, stage I or IV disease, past history of malignancy except (i) basal cell skin cancer or CIN cervix uteri or(ii) non-breast malignancy if treated with curative intent and at least 5 years disease-free or contralateral breast cancer, including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), irrespective of date of diagnosis. Patients with bilateral breast cancer were also excluded.

Patients were treated in supine position on a breast board with ipsilateral arm abducted to 900. All patients were planned using 2-D fluoroscopic conventional simulator with two tangential fields to the chest wall and a single incident field to the axilla and supraclavicular fossa. Lateral border of supraclavicular fossa was up to deltoid insertion.

Radiotherapy dose delivered was 35Gy/15fractions /3 weeks to the chest wall. Dose was prescribed at mid separation. Bolus was used in all patients on alternate days, that is for 50% of treatment. In patients with positive margins bolus was used daily and a scar boost of 10Gy/4fractions was given. None of the patients had breast reconstruction. Supraclavicular fossa(SCF), axillary chain and internal mammary nodal irradiation (IMNI)6 was done with a single incident field. No posterior axillary field was used. The dose delivered was 40Gy/15fractions/3weeks. All patients were treated on linac or cobalt-60 machine.

A biologically effective dose(BED) of 35Gy/15fractions/3weeks is 75.1Gy in terms of 2Gy per fraction for late effects, 55.1Gy for tumour control, 45Gy for erythema and 42.3Gy for desquamation in case of local radiotherapy. The BED for RNI with this schedule is 90Gy, 65Gy, 52.5Gy and 49Gy for late effects, tumour control, erythema and desquamation, respectively.

Patients were seen by the radiation oncologists with special focus on chest wall fibrosis, telangiectasia, shoulder function, lymphedema, arm pain and sensory symptoms. Late fibrosis was defined grade 1 as barely palpable firmness, grade 2 as definite increased firmness and grade 3 as marked firmness of the chest wall. Telangiectasia was defined grade 1 as <1cm2, grade 2 as 1 cm2-4 cm2 and grade 3 as >4 cm2 area of chest wall. Lymphedema was graded by measuring arm circumference 10cm above and below the medial epicondyle of humerus . For lymphedema and shoulder function, the treated side was compared with the untreated opposite side as a reference. Lymphedema was classified as none, mild, moderate and marked if there was no difference, 0.5-2cm, 2.1-3cm and >3cm difference, respectively in the circumference of the affected and normal arm. If the patient had symptoms of pain in the arm, paresthesia, numbness, weakness, or other sensory symptoms then injury to the brachial plexus was suspected and reported as brachial plexopathy. A four point scale(none, a little, quite a bit, very much ) was used to assess all late effects according to the RTOG LENT SOMA scale. Late lung toxicity was defined grade 1 as asymptomatic or mild symptoms of dry cough, slight radiographic changes; grade 2 as moderate symptomatic fibrosis or pneumonitis (severe cough), low grade fever, patchy radiographic changes; grade 3 as severe symptomatic fibrosis or pneumonitis, dense radiographic changes and grade 4 as severe respiratory insufficiencies, oxygen required of assisted ventilation. Late cardiac toxicity was defined grade 1 as minimal enlargement of cardiosilhoutte (ECS), grade 2 as ECS without pulmonary congestion, grade 3 as ECS pulmonary congestion and grade 4 as ECS with frank pulmonary oedema. All late effects assessment scores were dichotomised as none/mild versus moderate/marked effects.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 1770

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: Female

• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with breast cancer who had undergone mastectomy followed by radiotherapy to the chest wall and regional nodes. Chemotherapy and hormonal therapy depending on the indication.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• invasive carcinoma of the breast, post mastectomy complete microscopic excision of primary tumour and stage II or III disease

Exclusion Criteria:

• breast conserving surgery, stage I or IV disease, past history of malignancy except (i) basal cell skin cancer or CIN cervix uteri or(ii) non- breast malignancy if treated with curative intent and at least 5 years disease-free or contralateral breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), bilateral breast cancer

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Observational Models: Case-Only
• Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Chest wall fibrosis ("change" is being assessed)	Late fibrosis was defined grade 1 as barely palpable firmness, grade 2 as definite increased firmness and grade 3 as marked firmness of the chest wall.	5, 10 and 15 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Telengiectasia ("change" is being assessed for all outcomes)	Telangiectasia was defined grade 1 as <1cm2, grade 2 as 1 cm2-4 cm2 and grade 3 as >4 cm2 area of chest wall	5, 10 and 15 years
Lymphedema	Lymphedema was graded by measuring arm circumference 10cm above and below the medial epicondyle of humerus . For lymphedema and shoulder function, the treated side was compared with the untreated opposite side as a reference. Lymphedema was classified as none, mild, moderate and marked if there was no difference, 0.5-2cm, 2.1-3cm and >3cm difference, respectively in the circumference of the affected and normal arm.	5, 10 and 15 years
Lung toxicity	Late lung toxicity was defined grade 1 as asymptomatic or mild symptoms of dry cough,slight radiographic changes; grade 2 as moderate symptomatic fibrosis or pneumonitis (severe cough), low grade fever, patchy radiographic changes; grade 3 as severe symptomatic fibrosis or pneumonitis, dense radiographic changes and grade 4 as severe respiratory insufficiencies, oxygen required of assisted ventilation.	5, 10 and 15 years
Cardiac toxicity	Late cardiac toxicity was defined grade 1 as minimal enlargement of cardiosilhoutte (ECS), grade 2 as ECS without pulmonary congestion, grade 3 as ECS pulmonary congestion and grade 4 as ECS with frank pulmonary oedema. All late effects assessment scores were dichotomised as none/mild versus moderate/marked effects.	5, 10 and 15 years

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): January 1, 1990
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 31, 2007
• Study Completion: June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 22, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 22, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): November 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): November 26, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 22, 2019
• Last Verified: November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Breast cancer; Hypofractionated radiotherapy; Post mastectomy
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Skin Diseases; Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Breast Diseases; Breast Neoplasms
• Other Study ID Numbers: LEHR

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No