BEAM vs. 90-Yttrium Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin®)/BEAM With ASCT for Relapsed DLBCL (SPINOZA)

February 12, 2018 updated by: City of Hope Medical Center

SPINOZA / שפינוזה. Study With Preparatory INduction Of Zevalin in Aggressive Lymphoma. A Randomized Phase 3 Study of BEAM Versus 90Yttrium Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin) / BEAM in Patients Requiring ASCT for Relapsed DLBCL

This randomized phase III trial studies 90-yttrium ibritumomab tiuxetan and combination chemotherapy compared with combination chemotherapy alone before stem cell transplant in treating patients with diffuse large b-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has returned after a period of improvement. Radioactive substances linked to monoclonal antibodies, such as 90-yttrium ibritumomab tiuxetan, can bind to cancer cells and give off radiation which may help kill cancer cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as carmustine, etoposide phosphate, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM), work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether 90-yttrium ibritumomab tiuxetan and BEAM before a stem cell transplant are more effective than BEAM alone in treating patients with diffuse large b-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival (OS) between the two transplant arms, with at least a two year of follow-up. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare progression-free survival (PFS), complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) proportion at day 100, time to hematopoietic recovery, incidence of infection, grade III-IV toxicities, treatment-related mortality, incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (AML).

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients receive rituximab intravenously (IV) on days -21 and -14, and 90-yttrium ibritumomab tiuxetan IV on day -14. Patients also receive BEAM comprising carmustine IV over 4 hours on day -6; cytarabine IV over 2 hours twice daily (BID) on days -5 to -2; etoposide IV over 1 hour BID or once daily (QD) on days -5 to -2; and melphalan IV on day -1. Patients then undergo peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant on day 0. ARM II: Patients receive BEAM as in Arm I and undergo PBSC transplant on day 0.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up weekly for 30 days, 100 days, 6 months, 1 year, every 3 months for 1 year, and then annually for 3 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • City of Hope Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with CD20 positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma as confirmed by a pathological biopsy report.
  2. Patients who are candidates for autologous stem-cell transplantation due to primary refractory or first relapse of disease.
  3. Patients must have chemo-sensitive disease achieving at least partial response (Cheson 2007 criteria) to last chemotherapy.
  4. Patients with adequate autologous stem cell collection for transplantation (target >= 2.5 x 10^6 CD34+ cells/kg).
  5. Patients must sign written informed consent.
  6. Adequate birth control in fertile patients.
  7. All prior chemotherapy completed at least three weeks before study treatment.
  8. Marrow involvement less than 25% at transplantation, no limitation on blood counts (low platelet count allowed).
  9. Negative HIV antibody.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chemo-refractory disease as determined by less than partial response (Cheson 2007 Criteria) to last chemotherapy.
  2. Two or more relapses after initial response to induction chemotherapy.
  3. High-grade transformation from earlier diagnosis of low-grade lymphoma. Patients with "De Novo" Transformed DLBCL, defined as DLBCL only on lymph node biopsy and a discordant marrow with para-trabecular small cells at first diagnosis of lymphoma, are eligible if adherent to all other selection criteria.
  4. Bilirubin > 3.0 mg/dl, transaminases > 3 times upper normal limit.
  5. Creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl.
  6. KPS < 70.
  7. Uncontrolled infection.
  8. Pregnancy or lactation.
  9. Abnormal lung diffusion capacity (DLCO < 40% predicted).
  10. Severe cardiovascular disease; New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification ≥2.
  11. Active CNS disease involvement.
  12. Presence of any other malignancy or history of prior malignancy within 5 years of study entry. Within 5 years, patients treated for Stage I or II cancers are eligible provided they have a life expectancy > 5 years in relation to this prior malignance. The 5-year exclusion rule does not apply to-non melanoma skin tumors and in situ cervical cancer.
  13. Pleural effusion or ascites > 1 liter.
  14. Known hypersensitivity to rituximab.
  15. Psychiatric conditions/disease that impair the ability to give informed consent or to adequately co-operate.
  16. Prior radioimmunotherapy.
  17. Prior autologous or allogeneic HSCT.
  18. Active evidence of Hepatitis B or C infection; Hepatitis B surface antigen positive.
  19. Patients who have had prior radiation to the lung will be excluded from the study, although mediastinal irradiation will be permitted if minimal lung is in the treatment volume.
  20. Patients who have received >500cGy radiation to the kidneys will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (ZBEAM)
Patients receive rituximab IV on days -21 and -14, and 90-yttrium ibritumomab tiuxetan IV on day -14. Patients also receive BEAM comprising carmustine IV over 4 hours on day -6; cytarabine IV over 2 hours BID on days -5 to -2; etoposide IV over 1 hour BID or QD on days -5 to -2; and melphalan IV on day -1. Patients then undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant on day 0.
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Lastet
  • VP-16
Given IV
Other Names:
  • CHX-3311
  • Cytosar-U
  • U-19920
Given IV
Other Names:
  • MOAB IDEC-C2B8
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Alkeran
Given IV
Other Names:
  • BiCNU
  • FDA 0345
0.4 mCi/kg given IV
Other Names:
  • Zevalin
  • IDEC Y2B8
Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT)
Other Names:
  • Autologous Stem Cell Transplant
Active Comparator: Arm II (BEAM)
Patients receive BEAM comprising carmustine IV over 4 hours on day -6; cytarabine IV over 2 hours BID on days -5 to -2; etoposide IV over 1 hour BID or QD on days -5 to -2; and melphalan IV on day -1. Patients then undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant on day 0.
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Lastet
  • VP-16
Given IV
Other Names:
  • CHX-3311
  • Cytosar-U
  • U-19920
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Alkeran
Given IV
Other Names:
  • BiCNU
  • FDA 0345
Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT)
Other Names:
  • Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Measured from randomization to date of death or last follow up date, whichever occurs first, for up to 5 years post randomization
Survival estimates will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Measured from randomization to date of death or last follow up date, whichever occurs first, for up to 5 years post randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Survival
Time Frame: Measured from randomization until death, relapse/progression, receipt of anti-lymphoma therapy, or last follow up whichever comes first, for up to 5 years post randomization
Survival estimates will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method
Measured from randomization until death, relapse/progression, receipt of anti-lymphoma therapy, or last follow up whichever comes first, for up to 5 years post randomization
Time to Progression
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Time-to-event will be measured from the date of ASCT.
Up to 5 years
Number of Patients With Complete or Partial Response at Day 30
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day +30 post-HCT
Definition of disease status is based on the article of Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma Response Definitions for Clinical Trials (Cheson et al, 2007). Tests used for evaluation of disease status would be physical examination, laboratory testing, bone marrow testing, bone marrow biopsy and aspirate, PET scan, and CT scans of neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis as indicated.
Day 0 to Day +30 post-HCT
Time to Neutrophil Engraftment
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day 100 post-HCT
Time to neutrophil engraftment will be compared between treatment arms using a log-rank test, and the cumulative incidence curves will be estimated.
Day 0 to Day 100 post-HCT
Incidence of Infection
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day +100 post-HCT
Microbiologically documented infections will be reported by site of disease, date of onset, severity, and resolution, if any. The incidence of definite and probable viral, fungal and bacterial infections will be tabulated for each patient. The proportion of patients developing infections will be compared between treatment arms.
Day 0 to Day +100 post-HCT
Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality (NRM) Defined as Death Occurring in a Patient From Causes Other Than Relapse or Progression
Time Frame: From randomization until non-disease related death, or last follow-up, whichever comes first, assessed up to 5 years
The cumulative incidence of NRM will be estimated using the method described by Gooley et al. Differences between cumulative incidence curves in the presence of a competing risk will be tested using the Gray method.
From randomization until non-disease related death, or last follow-up, whichever comes first, assessed up to 5 years
Cumulative Incidence of Secondary Malignancies
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and secondary acute Myelogenous leukemia (AML) will be compared between the treatment arms using Gray's test.
Up to 5 years
Time to Platelet Engraftment
Time Frame: Day 0 to Day 100 post-HCT
Time to platelet engraftment will be compared between treatment arms using a log-rank test, and the cumulative incidence curves will be estimated.
Day 0 to Day 100 post-HCT
Number of Patients With Grade 3-5 Toxicities Graded by the NCI CTCAE Version 4.0
Time Frame: Day -21 to Day +100 post-HCT
Observed toxicities will be summarized in terms of type and severity. In accordance with the secondary study objectives, descriptive analyses on these data will be performed.
Day -21 to Day +100 post-HCT
Cumulative Incidence of New, Abnormal Cytogenetics
Time Frame: Day 0 to Year 5 post-HCT
The cumulative incidence of therapy related new, abnormal cytogenetics will be estimated for both groups taking into account the competing risk of death among patients who do not develop a second malignancy.
Day 0 to Year 5 post-HCT

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amrita Y. Krishnan MD, MD, City of Hope Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on Etoposide

3
Subscribe