- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02399319
Comparison of INFIX and Plating for Pelvic Ring Injuries With Symphysis Disruptions
January 22, 2018 updated by: Indiana University
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Subcutaneous Internal Fixation ("INFIX") and Plating for Pelvic Ring Injuries With Symphysis Disruptions
The purpose of this study is to compare subcutaneous internal fixation and open plating of the symphysis in patients with a disruption of the symphysis requiring stabilization.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to determine whether either one of the two procedures has significant advantages over the other.
The null hypothesis of this study is that there is no difference between plating and subcutaneous internal fixation of symphysis disruptions with respect to primary and secondary outcomes.
The study is a randomized trial with patients who sustained a symphysis disruption who will randomize to either closed reduction and subcutaneous internal fixation, or open reduction and plating of the symphysis.
There will also be two observational arms of the study, patients who do not agree to randomization and will receive internal fixation according to the treating surgeon's discretion and patients with a symphysis disruption that do not require any form of anterior pelvic internal fixation based on the treating surgeon's opinion.
Clinical assessments will occur at the time of hospital admission and at all post-operative follow-up intervals (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6months, 12 months, and 24 months).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
4
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- A symphysis disruption either in the coronal and/or sagittal plane on anterior-posterior , inlet and/or outlet pelvic radiographs
- Need for anterior pelvic ring stabilization
- Injury amenable to plating as well as subcutaneous internal fixation per the treating surgeon's opinion
- Patient was ambulatory prior to sustaining the injury
- Provision of informed consent by patient or proxy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a slim build with little subcutaneous fat who cannot be treated with a subcutaneous internal fixator based on the treating surgeon's opinion
- Patients who are deemed not likely to follow-up (e.g. patients who live more than 50 miles away and patients with no fixed address)
- Moderately or severely cognitively impaired patients
- Pregnant women
- Prisoners
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Randomized to Internal Fixator
Patient signed consent and agreed to have their treatment method randomized and the randomization system determined that their surgical intervention would be internal fixator.
|
Internal fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are inserted under the skin, internally.
|
|
Experimental: Randomized to Symphyseal Plate
Patient signed consent and agreed to have their treatment method randomized and the randomization system determined that their surgical intervention would be internal plating of the symphysis.
|
A plate that spans across the symphysis to maintain reduction and stability.
|
|
Active Comparator: Observational - Internal Fixator
Patient signed consent but did not want to randomize their procedure and the treating physician selected the internal fixator intervention based on their opinion of how best to treat the specific case.
|
Internal fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are inserted under the skin, internally.
|
|
Active Comparator: Observational - Symphyseal Plate
Patient signed consent but did not want to randomize their procedure and the treating physician selected internal plating of the symphysis based on their opinion of how best to treat the specific case.
|
A plate that spans across the symphysis to maintain reduction and stability.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Outcomes
Time Frame: 24 hours - 24 months
|
The primary objective is to compare functional outcomes between subcutaneous internal fixation and symphyseal plating as measured by the PROMIS v1.2-Physical Function instrument.
|
24 hours - 24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Compare the health-related quality of life and functional outcome scores
Time Frame: 24 hours - 24 months
|
We will ask patients multiple questionnaires to assess their quality of life after surgery.
These questionnaires include: PROMIS v1.1 - Pain Interference, PROMIS v1.2 - Mobility, PROMIS v1.0 - Global Satisfaction with Sex Life, PROMIS v1.0 - Depression, Majeed score, SF-12, VAS, patient satisfaction score, time to return to work, revision surgery, use of assistive walking devices, length of hospital stay, and for me, PROMIS v1.0 - Erectile Function.
|
24 hours - 24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Zlowodzki, MD, Indiana University Health
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
- Merriman DJ, Ricci WM, McAndrew CM, Gardner MJ. Is application of an internal anterior pelvic fixator anatomically feasible? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2111-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2287-6.
- Dalal SA, Burgess AR, Siegel JH, Young JW, Brumback RJ, Poka A, Dunham CM, Gens D, Bathon H. Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: classification by mechanism is key to pattern of organ injury, resuscitative requirements, and outcome. J Trauma. 1989 Jul;29(7):981-1000; discussion 1000-2.
- Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Schubeck D, Wang XF. Functional outcomes in women after high-energy pelvic ring injury. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):296-301. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318221e94e.
- Raman R, Roberts CS, Pape HC, Giannoudis PV. Implant retention and removal after internal fixation of the symphysis pubis. Injury. 2005 Jul;36(7):827-31. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.11.012. Epub 2005 Feb 25.
- Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Schubeck D. Pelvic ring injury is associated with sexual dysfunction in women. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):308-13. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821d700e.
- Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Schubeck D. Pregnancy outcomes after pelvic ring injury. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):302-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822428c5.
- Cole PA, Gauger EM, Anavian J, Ly TV, Morgan RA, Heddings AA. Anterior pelvic external fixator versus subcutaneous internal fixator in the treatment of anterior ring pelvic fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):269-77. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182410577.
- Gardner MJ, Mehta S, Mirza A, Ricci WM. Anterior pelvic reduction and fixation using a subcutaneous internal fixator. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):314-21. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318220bb22.
- Moazzam C, Heddings AA, Moodie P, Cole PA. Anterior pelvic subcutaneous internal fixator application: an anatomic study. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):263-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31823e6b82.
- Vaidya R, Kubiak EN, Bergin PF, Dombroski DG, Critchlow RJ, Sethi A, Starr AJ. Complications of anterior subcutaneous internal fixation for unstable pelvis fractures: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2124-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2233-z.
- Vaidya R, Colen R, Vigdorchik J, Tonnos F, Sethi A. Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with an internal anterior fixator and posterior fixation: initial clinical series. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jan;26(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318233b8a7.
- Majeed SA. External fixation of the injured pelvis. The functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Jul;72(4):612-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2380212.
- Drummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):344-9. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002088.
- PELTIER LF. COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH FRACTURES OF THE PELVIS. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1965 Jul;47:1060-9. No abstract available.
- Scaglione M, Parchi P, Digrandi G, Latessa M, Guido G. External fixation in pelvic fractures. Musculoskelet Surg. 2010 Nov;94(2):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s12306-010-0084-5. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
- Pohlemann T, Bosch U, Gansslen A, Tscherne H. The Hannover experience in management of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Aug;(305):69-80.
- Holstein JH, Pizanis A, Kohler D, Pohlemann T; Working Group Quality of Life After Pelvic Fractures. What are predictors for patients' quality of life after pelvic ring fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Sep;471(9):2841-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2840-y.
- Kabak S, Halici M, Tuncel M, Avsarogullari L, Baktir A, Basturk M. Functional outcome of open reduction and internal fixation for completely unstable pelvic ring fractures (type C): a report of 40 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Sep;17(8):555-62. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200309000-00003.
- McCarthy ML, MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Copeland CE, Hash CS, Burgess AR. Functional status following orthopedic trauma in young women. J Trauma. 1995 Nov;39(5):828-36; discussion 836-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199511000-00005.
- Mullis BH, Sagi HC. Minimum 1-year follow-up for patients with vertical shear sacroiliac joint dislocations treated with iliosacral screws: does joint ankylosis or anatomic reduction contribute to functional outcome? J Orthop Trauma. 2008 May-Jun;22(5):293-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31816b6b4e.
- Oliver CW, Twaddle B, Agel J, Routt ML Jr. Outcome after pelvic ring fractures: evaluation using the medical outcomes short form SF-36. Injury. 1996 Nov;27(9):635-41. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(96)00100-3.
- Suzuki T, Shindo M, Soma K, Minehara H, Nakamura K, Uchino M, Itoman M. Long-term functional outcome after unstable pelvic ring fracture. J Trauma. 2007 Oct;63(4):884-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000235888.90489.fc.
- Matta JM. Indications for anterior fixation of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):88-96. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00011.
- Matta JM, Saucedo T. Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 May;(242):83-97.
- Pohlemann T, Gansslen A, Schellwald O, Culemann U, Tscherne H. Outcome after pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 1996;27 Suppl 2:B31-8.
- Tornetta P 3rd, Dickson K, Matta JM. Outcome of rotationally unstable pelvic ring injuries treated operatively. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):147-51. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00018.
- Tornetta P 3rd, Matta JM. Outcome of operatively treated unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):186-93. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00022.
- Lefaivre KA, Slobogean GP, Valeriote J, O'Brien PJ, Macadam SA. Reporting and interpretation of the functional outcomes after the surgical treatment of disruptions of the pelvic ring: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Apr;94(4):549-55. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B4.27960.
- Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Mar;71(2):304-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B2.2925751.
- Lefaivre KA, Slobogean GP, Ngai JT, Broekhuyse HM, O'Brien PJ. What outcomes are important for patients after pelvic trauma? Subjective responses and psychometric analysis of three published pelvic-specific outcome instruments. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jan;28(1):23-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182945fe9.
- Sprague S, Leece P, Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski MF; S.P.R.I.N.T. Investigators. Limiting loss to follow-up in a multicenter randomized trial in orthopedic surgery. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Dec;24(6):719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.012.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 21, 2016
Study Completion (Actual)
July 21, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 25, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
March 26, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 25, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 22, 2018
Last Verified
July 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1403899155
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anterior Pelvic Ring Injury With Symphysis Disruption
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruitingPelvic Ring Injury | Pelvic Ring FracturesEgypt
-
University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore; McMaster University; Orthopaedic Trauma AssociationRecruitingInternal Fixation | Fragility Fracture | Multiple Closed Pelvic Fractures With Disruption of Pelvic Ring | Nonoperative CareUnited States, Spain
-
Duke UniversityWake Forest University Health Sciences; Orthopaedic Trauma Association; Prisma...Completed
-
Axel GamulinCompleted
-
Indiana UniversityTerminatedAnterior Pelvic Ring FracturesUnited States
-
Chonburi hospitalActive, not recruitingSacral Fractures | High-energy Trauma | Posterior Pelvic Ring InjuryThailand
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownEndodontically-Treated Teeth | Spacing of Anterior Maxillary Teeth | Broken Teeth Injury With ComplicationEgypt
Clinical Trials on Internal Fixator
-
Indiana UniversityTerminatedAnterior Pelvic Ring FracturesUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityCompleted
-
Kasr El Aini HospitalCompleted
-
Fabio lucas rodriguesCompleted
-
University of California, DavisTerminated
-
AO Innovation Translation CenterCompletedTibial Fractures | External Fixation Pin Site InfectionGermany
-
Hopital de l'Enfant-JesusCompletedRadius FracturesCanada
-
Ege UniversityCompletedTrauma | Rib FracturesTurkey
-
Sohag UniversityCompleted