- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04063657
External Fixation Versus Splinting of Acute Calcaneus Fractures
January 12, 2022 updated by: University of California, Davis
External Fixation Versus Splinting of Acute Calcaneus Fractures Prior to Definitive Surgery
Aim:
- Determine if external fixation decreases soft tissue complications compared to splinting.
- Determine if external fixation decreases time to definitive surgical stabilization and improves final fixation compared to splinting.
- Determine if external fixation improves functional outcomes as evaluated by validated functional scoring systems.
Hypothesis:
- External fixation improves definitive fixation and functional outcomes of acute calcaneal fractures with decreased complication rates compared to splinting
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
1
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
- University of California, Davis Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 69 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Voluntary consent
- Age 18 to 69
- Clinical and/or advanced imaging confirming an acute calcaneal fracture that has occurred within 2 days of which, eventually definitive surgery is recommended/accepted.
- Unable to consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age <18
- Prior surgery of the affected extremity
- Prisoners
- Pregnant women
- Inflammatory arthritis
- Non-English-speaking patients
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: External fixation
Adults diagnosed with an acute (<2 days from injury) calcaneal fracture recommended for operative treatment will be placed in external fixator until the patient is deemed clinically appropriate for definitive surgical fixation.
|
Patients will be placed in an external fixator followed by open versus closed surgical stabilization of their calcaneus fracture when their soft tissue is appropriate for surgery.
|
Active Comparator: Splinting
Adults diagnosed with an acute (<2 days from injury) calcaneal fracture recommended for operative treatment will be placed in a short leg splint until the patient is deemed clinically appropriate for definitive surgical fixation.
|
Patients will be placed in a short leg splint followed by open versus closed surgical stabilization of their calcaneus fracture when their soft tissue is appropriate for surgery.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time to Definitive Surgery
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks from injury
|
Duration of time from injury to definitive surgery
|
Within 2 weeks from injury
|
Soft Tissue Complications
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 weeks after surgery
|
Incidence of infection, dehiscence and need for soft tissue coverage
|
Assessed at 2 weeks after surgery
|
Soft Tissue Complications
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 weeks after surgery
|
Incidence of infection, dehiscence and need for soft tissue coverage
|
Assessed at 6 weeks after surgery
|
Soft Tissue Complications
Time Frame: Assessed at 12 weeks after surgery
|
Incidence of infection, dehiscence and need for soft tissue coverage
|
Assessed at 12 weeks after surgery
|
Soft Tissue Complications
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 months after surgery
|
Incidence of infection, dehiscence and need for soft tissue coverage
|
Assessed at 6 months after surgery
|
Soft Tissue Complications
Time Frame: Assessed at 12 months after surgery
|
Incidence of infection, dehiscence and need for soft tissue coverage
|
Assessed at 12 months after surgery
|
Soft Tissue Complications
Time Frame: Assessed at 24 months after surgery
|
Incidence of infection, dehiscence and need for soft tissue coverage
|
Assessed at 24 months after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Union Rate
Time Frame: Plain xrays at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. CT scan at 1 year.
|
Assessment of fracture healing
|
Plain xrays at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. CT scan at 1 year.
|
Radiographic Parameters - Bohler's Angle
Time Frame: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Bohler's angle
|
Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Radiographic Parameters - Calcaneal Height
Time Frame: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Calcaneal height
|
Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Radiographic Parameters - Angle of Gissan
Time Frame: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Angle of Gissan
|
Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Radiographic Parameters - Calcaneal Width
Time Frame: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Calcaneal width
|
Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Radiographic Parameters - Calcaneal Length
Time Frame: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Calcaneal length
|
Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Functional Outcomes - VAS
Time Frame: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery.
|
Assess Visual Analogue pain score(VAS).
This will be a patient reported measure from 0-10, minimum score of 0 (no pain), maximum score of 10 (most pain).
|
Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery.
|
Functional Outcomes - FFI-R
Time Frame: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Revised foot function index questionnaire (FFI-R) will assess patient pain, stiffness, activity, difficulties with ambulation, and social issues.
The score is tabulated from 34 questions answered 1-5 (1= none of the time, 5= All of the time, scale 34-170).
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Functional Outcomes - FAAM ADL
Time Frame: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Foot and Ankle Ability measure activities of daily living (FAAM ADL) is a 21-item activities assessing the patient's functionality related to their activities of daily living.
The response to each item is scored from 4 to 0, with 4 being ''no difficulty'' and 0 being ''unable to do." Scale 0-84.
Higher scores indicate a more favorable functional level.
|
Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Functional Outcomes - FAAM Sport
Time Frame: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Foot and Ankle Ability measure activities of daily living (FAAM Sport) is a 8-item questionnaire assess the patient's ability to participate in athletic activities.
The response to each item is scored from 4 to 0, with 4 being ''no difficulty'' and 0 being ''unable to do." Scale 0-32.
Higher scores indicate a more favorable functional level.
|
Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher D Kreulen, MD, MS, Foot and Ankle Surgery Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of California, Davis Medical Center
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 14, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 3, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
September 3, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 19, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
August 21, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 9, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 12, 2022
Last Verified
January 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1436830
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Calcaneus Fracture
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterNot yet recruitingTrauma Injury | Calcaneus Fracture | Displaced Intra-Articular Fracture of Calcaneus (Diagnosis)
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedPrimary Subtalar Arthrodesis Versus Late Subtalar Arthrodesis in Sanders Type IV Calcaneal FracturesCalcaneus FractureEgypt
-
Yangzhou UniversityCompletedCalcaneus Fracture
-
Ostfold Hospital TrustVestre Viken Hospital Trust; Oslo University Hospital; Haukeland University HospitalRecruiting
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedCalcaneus FractureEgypt
-
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.University of UtahCompletedPilon Fracture | Calcaneus Fracture | Ankle Fracture | Talus FractureUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNot yet recruiting
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedCalcaneus FracturesUnited States
-
University of Alabama at Birmingham3MCompletedFracture of Calcaneus, Pilon or Tibial PlateauUnited States
-
University of Southern DenmarkUnknownCalcaneus Fracture | Orthopedic Devices Associated With MisadventuresDenmark
Clinical Trials on External fixator
-
Indiana UniversityTerminatedAnterior Pelvic Ring FracturesUnited States
-
AO Innovation Translation CenterCompletedTibial Fractures | External Fixation Pin Site InfectionGermany
-
Fabio lucas rodriguesCompleted
-
Sohag UniversityCompleted
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterCompleted
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUnknown
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruitingDeformities Around the Knee in PedietricsEgypt
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamSmith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedKnee DislocationUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoDoris Duke Charitable Foundation; Wyss Foundation, IncCompletedTrauma | Tibial Fractures | Open Fracture of Tibia