- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02443480
Development and Validation of the Saint Paul's Endoscopy Comfort Scale (SPECS) for Colonoscopy and Upper Endoscopy
October 24, 2017 updated by: Robert Enns, University of British Columbia
Do You Have Your SPECS in Order? Development and Validation of the Saint Paul's Endoscopy Comfort Scale (SPECS) for Colonoscopy and Upper Endoscopy
The investigators created the St. Paul's Endoscopy Comfort Score (SPECS) which includes the frequency of verbal cues, body positioning and anxiety levels with descriptions for each of the variables.
Our objective is to compare the SPECS, NAPCOMs, NPAT and GS amongst different observers and to determine any correlation with patient satisfaction.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
Colonoscopy is used for the diagnosis and treatment of colonic lesions as well as screening and follow up of patients at risk of developing colorectal cancer.
With the increasing demand for colonoscopies, the number of procedures performed in recent years has increased dramatically (Bjorkman & Popp Jr., 2006).
Given that performance of a high quality colonoscopy is dependent on the expertise and technical skills of the endoscopist, quantitative and reliable methods for measurement of the quality of colonoscopy are needed.
Although other colonoscopy quality indicators, such as adenoma detection rate, have been studied comprehensively (Rex, et al., 2006), patient comfort as a measure of endoscopic quality performance has not been thoroughly assessed.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
350
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 2K5
- St. Paul's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Outpatients referred to Saint Paul's Hospital for colonoscopy and upper endoscopy
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 19 years or older
- Outpatients referred to Saint Paul's Hospital for colonoscopy and upper endoscopy
- Capable of reading and understanding English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who undergo colonoscopy and upper endoscopy in the same appointment
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Inter-observer reliability
Time Frame: 15-30 minutes
|
To determine the inter-observer reliability for the SPECS amongst observers and the different comfort scores, NAPCOMS, GS and NPAT.
|
15-30 minutes
|
|
Correlation with patient's reported pain
Time Frame: 10-15 minutes
|
To determine the correlation of SPECS, NAPCOMS, GS and NPAT with post-procedure patient reported pain and satisfaction controlling for sedation.
|
10-15 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Ely EW, Truman B, Shintani A, Thomason JW, Wheeler AP, Gordon S, Francis J, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, Sessler CN, Dittus RS, Bernard GR. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). JAMA. 2003 Jun 11;289(22):2983-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.22.2983.
- Rostom A, Ross ED, Dube C, Rutter MD, Lee T, Valori R, Bridges RJ, Pontifex D, Webbink V, Rees C, Brown C, Whetter DH, Kelsey SG, Hilsden RJ. Development and validation of a nurse-assessed patient comfort score for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Feb;77(2):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.003.
- Munson GW, Van Norstrand MD, O'donnell JJ, Hammes NL, Francis DL. Intraprocedural evaluation of comfort for sedated outpatient upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: the La Crosse (WI) intra-endoscopy sedation comfort score. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011 Jul-Aug;34(4):296-301. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e3182248777.
- Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, Hoffman B, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Petersen BT, Safdi MA, Faigel DO, Pike IM. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Apr;63(4 Suppl):S16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.021. No abstract available.
- Bjorkman DJ, Popp JW Jr. Measuring the quality of endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Apr;63(4 Suppl):S1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.022. No abstract available.
- Dyson JK, Mason JM, Rutter MD. Prior hysterectomy and discomfort during colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort analysis. Endoscopy. 2014 Jun;46(6):493-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365462. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
- Gelinas C, Puntillo KA, Joffe AM, Barr J. A validated approach to evaluating psychometric properties of pain assessment tools for use in nonverbal critically ill adults. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr;34(2):153-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1342970. Epub 2013 May 28.
- Klein DG, Dumpe M, Katz E, Bena J. Pain assessment in the intensive care unit: development and psychometric testing of the nonverbal pain assessment tool. Heart Lung. 2010 Nov-Dec;39(6):521-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2010.05.053.
- Ko HH, Zhang H, Telford JJ, Enns R. Factors influencing patient satisfaction when undergoing endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Apr;69(4):883-91, quiz 891.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.024. Epub 2009 Jan 18.
- Kohli E, Ptak J, Smith R, Taylor E, Talbot EA, Kirkland KB. Variability in the Hawthorne effect with regard to hand hygiene performance in high- and low-performing inpatient care units. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;30(3):222-5. doi: 10.1086/595692.
- Leonard KL. Is patient satisfaction sensitive to changes in the quality of care? An exploitation of the Hawthorne effect. J Health Econ. 2008 Mar;27(2):444-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.07.004. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 12, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
May 13, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 26, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 24, 2017
Last Verified
October 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- H14-01714
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Patient Comfort
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesCompleted
-
St. John Health System, MichiganCompletedPatient ComfortUnited States
-
University of UtahCompletedPatient Monitoring | Oxygen Delivery | Patient ComfortUnited States
-
GE Healthcarei3 StatprobeCompletedPatient Comfort and SafetyUnited States
-
Innovative MedicalCompletedPatient Comfort | Lens CleanlinessUnited States
-
MEDICANATokat Gaziosmanpasa University; TOKI Family Health Centre; Sivas Provincial Health...CompletedPatient Comfort | Intramuscular Injection PainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Uskudar UniversityCompletedMaternal Health | Fetal Monitoring | Patient ComfortTurkey
-
Duke UniversityCompleted
-
Kastamonu UniversityCompletedAnxiety | Patient Satisfaction | Patient ComfortTurkey
-
University of JordanJordan University HospitalNot yet recruitingWound Healing | Patient Comfort | Suture Materials | Oral Health-Related Quality of Life