Minoxidil 2% Solution and Botanical Hair Regimen in Women With Thinning Hair and Female Pattern Hair Loss/Androgenic Alopecia

July 14, 2023 updated by: Galderma R&D

Multicenter, Open Label Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effect and Tolerability of Minoxidil 2% Solution and Botanical Hair Solution Regimen in Women With Thinning Hair and Female Pattern Hair Loss/Androgenic Alopecia (Ludwig I and II)

The purpose of this study is to characterize the effect of Minoxidil 2% Solution and Botanical Hair Solution Regimen in women with thinning hair and female pattern hair loss/androgenic alopecia (Ludwig I and II).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Richardson, Texas, United States, 75081
        • Stephens & Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female patients age 18 to 60 years at the time of enrollment.
  2. Women who have self-perceived thinning hair.
  3. Women who have presentation of female pattern hair loss/androgenic alopecia (Ludwig I and II).

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of allergic reactions or severe intolerance to minoxidil and Botanical Hair Solution product ingredients.
  2. Plan to use any other concomitant therapy to treat hair loss, regrowth or volume during the study.

3 Subjects taking or planning to take topical or systemic prescription or OTC medications for treating hair loss and/or hair volume.

4. Any significant history of concurrent medical disease, which in the judgment of the Investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry to this study including history of skin disease that may confound study results.

5. Subjects who have recently (within the last 6 months) started the use of hormones for birth control or hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Women currently using hormones for birth control or HRT must have been on a stable dose (6 months or longer) in order to be eligible for the study.

6. Pregnant or breast-feeding females or women planning to become pregnant during the course of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Investigator's Rating of Global Photographs at Week 12
Time Frame: At Week 12
The Investigator or a trained grader rated each participant's standardized global photographs for improvement from baseline for parameters like hair thinning, hair growth, impression of scalp hair coverage and overall perception of treatment benefit using a 1-to-7-point Likert scale. The score on the scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum), that is, (1) Entirely Disagree; (2) Mostly Disagree; (3) Somewhat Disagree; (4) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (5) Somewhat Agree; (6) Mostly Agree; (7) Entirely Agree.
At Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Participant Rating at Week 12
Time Frame: At Week 12
Participants rated the parameters like appearance of hair, growth of hair, satisfaction with Hairline at the front of the head, satisfaction with hair on the top of the head and satisfaction with hair overall as an overall improvement from the baseline by conducting their own assessments by looking in a mirror and evaluating improvement from baseline using a 1 to 7-point Likert scale. The scores on the scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum), that is, (1) Entirely Disagree; (2) Mostly Disagree; (3) Somewhat Disagree; (4) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (5) Somewhat Agree; (6) Mostly Agree; (7) Entirely Agree.
At Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Shed Hair Count
Time Frame: At Week 12
Participants collected their hair full day, including after combing and hair-washing. Participants turned in these hair collections at each visit. The results were averaged weekly. Mean change from baseline in hair wash/shed hair count was reported at week 12.
At Week 12
Number of Participants in Each Response Category Based on Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: At Week 4, 6 and 12
Participant satisfaction with the treatment experience data was collected via a written questionnaire This questionnaire composed of 5-point Likert scale questions, as well as free-text responses. Participants were asked to determine overall satisfaction with the treatment. The choices were: 1-2 = Agree; 4-5 = Disagree; 3 = Neutral.
At Week 4, 6 and 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: From start of study drug administration up to Week 12
AEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a study product in humans, whether or not considered study product related. An AE could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study product and would not imply any judgment about causality. An AE could arise with any use of the study product and with any route of administration, formulation, or dose, including an overdose. Thus any new sign, symptom or disease, or clinically significant increase in the intensity of an existing sign, or symptom would be considered as an AE. Any new clinically relevant sign or symptom suffered by the participant, which appeared after the study procedures was reported as an AE. Any worsening in scalp dryness or itch score from baseline was also reported as an AE. The Investigator or designee had the final authorization to determine if a reaction was considered an AE.
From start of study drug administration up to Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Warren Winkelman, MD, PhD, MBA, Galderma R&D

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 27, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 19, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 19, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

June 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Female Pattern Hair Loss, Androgenic Alopecia

Clinical Trials on Treatment: Minoxidil 2% / Botanical Hair Solution for Women

Subscribe