Natural History of Multiple Sclerosis and Its Mimickers

Thematic Studies of Multiple Sclerosis and Related Diseases

Background:

- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used for decades to help diagnose and monitor neurological disorders like multiple sclerosis (MS). Researchers want to improve how MRI pictures are taken. They also want to learn more about using newer MRIs with stronger magnets to get better pictures than standard MRIs provide.

Objectives:

- To collect data that will help researchers better understand MS and related diseases.

Eligibility:

  • Adults 18 and older with MS or MRI findings that appear similar to MS, or with other neurological diseases that may look or act like MS.
  • Healthy adult volunteers.

Design:

  • Participants will be screened with a review of their medical records.
  • Participants will have a baseline visit. It will include a physical exam, medical history, and neurological exam. They may have blood tests.
  • The study will last indefinitely.
  • Participants may have MRIs. Some MRIs may include a contrast dye. For this, a needle will be used to guide a thin plastic tube into an arm vein.
  • Participants may have up to 2 lumbar punctures per year. Skin will be numbed and a needle inserted between back bones will remove fluid.
  • Participants may give saliva samples and have an eye exam.
  • Participants may have evoked potential tests. These measure how the nervous system responds to different types of stimulation. Participants may sit in front of a TV and watch pictures on the screen. Or they may wear earphones that make a clicking noise or static. Or they may get a small electrical shock that may tingle and cause a hand or foot twitch.
  • Participants may have tests of strength, spasticity, sensations, balance, and/or walking.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objectives.

The goals of this protocol are to study the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (MS), primarily through small studies that utilize magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to correlate the results with clinical and biological measures. The protocol includes only techniques with minimal risk (standard and quantitative clinical evaluation, MRI, blood draws, saliva testing, urine and stool collection, visual evoked potentials, ophthalmologic evaluation) or more-than-minimal risk (injection of approved gadolinium-based contrast agents, lumbar punctures) that are appropriate and common in this study population. Under this protocol, we will conduct:

  • Pilot substudies. These studies are exploratory and hypothesis generating. Once sufficient data are collected to justify a hypothesis-driven study and a formal power analysis, further work will continue under either a dedicated protocol or, if appropriate, a hypothesis-testing substudy. There are no enrollment limitations for pilot substudies.
  • Hypothesis-testing substudy. These studies have a specific hypothesis that can be tested with at most 6 participants per arm. If additional participants are required, a memo will be sent to the Protocol Review Committee (PIRC) and its statistical reviewer to request review of a hypothesis-testing substudy for possible additional enrollment.The memo will also be forwarded to the IRB.
  • Individual patient substudies. These studies seek to increase knowledge of a disease process or to assist in the diagnosis of an individual patient.
  • Technique development substudies. These studies will lay the groundwork for new experimental paradigms, using the methods approved under this protocol, which can be further tested in the substudies listed above.
  • Training of investigators. These studies will be done to train new investigators in techniques relevant to the studies under this protocol.

Study Population

Three groups of study participants will be enrolled:

  • MS patients. Participants with definite, probable, or possible MS.
  • Patient controls. Participants with diseases that share features with MS.
  • Healthy volunteers.

Design

We will design small substudies as ideas arise in the course of our work that are pertinent to the theme of the pathophysiology of MS (or of diseases that share features with MS). If a hypothesis testing sub-study leads to results of interest and if a larger population is necessary to reach statistical significance, a separate protocol will be submitted with a priori hypotheses, specific study design and power analysis adapted from the pilot or exploratory substudies performed in the present protocol.

Outcome Measures

These will include MRI, clinical, and biological outcome measures consistent with the objectives of the study and its investigators. Imaging measures will focus on features related to the central nervous system (CNS), particularly focal lesions. Clinical measures will include standard and established MS disability scales as well as quantitative measures related to function. Biological measures will include genotype, gene expression, proteomics, virological studies, and immunological profiling.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
        • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Up to 1300 participants will be enrolled onto this open-ended thematic protocol. The following study populations will be included:- Participants with definite, probable, or possible MS. These participants either carry a diagnosis of MS, or else their referring clinicians are considering the diagnosis.-Participants with diseases that share imaging features with MS. These participants report clinical symptoms or prior MRI findings that could, in the best judgment of the investigators, be due to inflammatory demyelination of the central nervous system.- Healthy volunteers.-Withdrawals and dropouts will not be replaced.

Description

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:

<TAB>

  • One or more of the following:

    • Diagnosis of MS, clinically isolated syndrome, or radiologically isolated syndrome.
    • Presentation with clinical or neuroimaging findings that, in the best judgment of the investigators, are possibly consistent with central nervous system inflammatory demyelination.
    • Healthy volunteer.
  • Age greater than or equal to18.
  • Able to participate in study procedures and provide high-quality clinical research data, in the best judgment of the investigators.
  • Interest of the study investigators in performing one or more procedures under one or more of the substudies.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

<TAB>

  • Unwilling to allow sharing and/or use in future studies of coded samples and data that are collected for this study.
  • Inability to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
healthy volunteers
patient controls
Participants with diseases that share features with MS.
patients with suspected or confirmed multiple sclerosis
Participants with definite, probable, or possible MS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Association between clinical status and research data
Time Frame: over time
Imaging measures will focus on features related to the central nervous system (CNS), particularly focal lesions. Clinical measures will include standard and established MS disability scales as well as quantitative measures related to function. Biological measures will include genotype, gene expression, proteomics, virological studies, and immunological profiling.
over time

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 23, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

3
Subscribe