Frail Status of Elderly Patients After Repair and Anesthesia Guided by the bispectraL Index (FRAGIL)

March 15, 2022 updated by: Hopital Foch

Influence of the Modality of General Anesthesia Guided by the Bispectral Index (Manual or Automated) on the Occurrence of a Loss of Capability in Elderly Patients (> 70 Yrs): a Randomized Multicenter Study

The first aim of this study is to compare two methods of administration of intravenous anesthetics to obtain the same level of depth (bispectral index between 40 and 60): manual or automated and to determine a mid-term (6 months) influence of the frail phenotype on self-sufficient elderly patients after general anesthesia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To date, patients over the age of 60 yrs represent 25% of the population and are at increased risk of surgical repair. Reduction of postoperative morbidity and mortality are now two main concerns for medical research. Dependence on caregivers and cognitive impairments are two major risks in the elderly and even more in frail patients after surgery under general anesthesia. In this context continuous monitoring of the depth of anesthesia through bispectral index may reduce its occurrence with better control of too deep sedation periods (vasopressors…). Previous studies by the investigators' team suggest a better duration in the expected interval of Bispectral Index with automated control of administration of intravenous anesthetics guided by Bispectral Index. This method remains to be tested in this high-risk population. As a consequence, a randomization into two groups will be carried on elderly patients (> 70 yrs): manual administration of anesthetics guided by Bispectral Index (manual group) or automated administration (automated group). Complete preoperative assessments will determine the FRAIL status (with a decrease in the physiological reserve) and abilities of the patient according to the self-sufficient scale. At six months a follow-up will determine the geriatric status of the patient to explore the rate of impairment and to examine predictive factors in the preoperative assessment. Finally, the influence of the method of administration will be reported. Four hundred and thirty patients will be included in this multicenter study with 215 patients per group and stratification of the presence of a cancer and of the abdominal repair. The follow-up in this study allows the patient or his/her relatives to keep in touch with a physician and to prescribe some therapy early if frailty or any other cognitive impairment appears.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

134

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Besançon, France, 25030
        • Hôpital Jean Minjoz
      • Levallois-Perret, France, 92300
        • Institut Hopsitalier Franco-Britannique
      • Soyaux, France, 16800
        • Centre Clinical
      • Suresnes, France, 92150
        • Hopital Foch

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged > 70 years old
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists class I to III
  • Scheduled for abdominal surgery under total intra-venous anesthesia
  • Self sufficient (living at home or in a non medical institution)
  • Written consent to the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to any intravenous agent (propofol or remifentanil)
  • Cognitive impairment with a Mini Mental State Examination < 20
  • Severe visual or hearing deficiency, apraxia
  • Restriction of the use of bispectral index

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Toolbox: Automated group

Toolbox: Automated administration of intravenous anesthetic (propofol 1%) and analgesic (remifentanil, Ultiva(r)) guided by the Bispectral index through a controller with a previously described algorithm.

Objective of depth anesthesia: 40-60

A dedicated algorithm controls the infusion rate of drugs depending on the magnitude of variation of the bispectral index
Other Names:
  • controller
Active Comparator: Manual group

Manual administration of intravenous anesthetic (propofol 1%) and analgesic (remifentanil, Ultiva(r)) guided by the Bispectral index as usually performed in the operative theater.

Objective of depth anesthesia: 40-60

The anesthesiologist controls the infusion rate of drugs depending of the magnitude of variation of the bispectral index

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of patients without occurrence of disability according to the InterRai scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Disability is evaluated using the InterRai scale; a death is considered as an irreversible disability institutionalization is considered as a severe disability InterRai scale would discriminate other patients
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality at day 28
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Mortality at month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Rate of postoperative cognitive dysfunction
Time Frame: 6 months
Cognitive dysfunction is evaluated using the Mini Mental State examination
6 months
Incidence of pneumopathy
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined as a septic syndrome (fever) + increased number of polynuclear cells + typical image on chest X-ray + treatment with antibiotics
6 months
Incidence of pulmonary embolism
Time Frame: 6 months
Diagnosis on CT-scan with contrast injection
6 months
Incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 6 months
EKG modification and raised troponin
6 months
Incidence of evolution of the frail phenotype
Time Frame: 6 months
Frail phenotype accordingly to Fried Scale
6 months
Quality of the general anesthesia
Time Frame: 1 day
Defined as the time with a Bispectral Index in the interval 40-60
1 day
Performance of the automated system
Time Frame: 1 day
Defined according to the Varvell score
1 day
Presence of Suppression Ratio
Time Frame: 1 day
Defined as a period of isoelectric cortical signal with a threshold at 10% for 1 minute
1 day
Occurrence of arterial hypotension requiring treatment
Time Frame: 1 day
Defined as a drop of 20% or more of the mean arterial pressure compared to the basal value measured before anesthetic induction and the requirement for a vasoactive agent
1 day
Patients'satisfaction about general anesthesia
Time Frame: 1 day
Evaluation using a numeric scale from 0 (the worst remembrance) to 10 (an excellent moment)
1 day
Occurrence of awareness
Time Frame: 3 months
Postoperative specific questionnaire
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 7, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 14, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014/28
  • 2014-A01270-47 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, General

Clinical Trials on Toolbox: Automated group

Subscribe