- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04592588
Evaluating an Online Wellness Intervention for Indian College Students
Online Wellness Activities for Indian College Students
We are evaluating the effects of an online single-session mental health intervention (the Common Elements Toolbox; COMET). To evaluate COMET, we are conducting a randomized controlled trial with Indian college students. Students will be randomized to the COMET condition or to a wait-list control condition.
Primary outcome measures (depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and subjective well-being) will be measures at two weeks post-intervention, four weeks post-intervention, and twelve weeks post-intervention.
We will evaluate COMET as a universal intervention (using the full sample) and as a targeted intervention (analyzing those who reported elevated depressive symptoms or anxiety symptoms at baseline).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
New Delhi, India
- Ashoka University
-
Sonipat, India
- Jindal Global University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Common Elements Toolbox (COMET)
The Common Elements Toolbox is an online intervention consisting of modules from empirically supported treatments for common mental health problems.
|
COMET is an online unguided self-help intervention that lasts approximately 45-60 minutes.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Wait-list control condition
|
Participants in the control condition will receive access to the intervention after data collection for the study has been completed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
Depression questionnaire.
Scores range from 0 to 27.
Lower scores indicate less depression.
|
Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
|
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
Anxiety questionnaire.
Total scores range from 0-21.
Lower scores indicate less anxiety.
|
Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
|
Change in the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
Subjective Well-being questionnaire.
Total scores range from 7 to 35.
Higher values indicate higher well-being scores.
|
Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ratings on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Questionnaire measuring the acceptability of an intervention.
Acceptability refers to the perception that a given treatment is agreeable or satisfactory.
The total score ranges from 4 to 20.
Higher scores indicate higher acceptability ratings.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
|
Ratings on the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Questionnaire measuring the appropriateness of an intervention.
Appropriateness refers to the perceived fit or relevance of an intervention.
The total score ranges from 4 to 20.
Higher scores indicate higher appropriateness.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
|
Mechanisms of Change
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
Participants answered questions relating to each module's mechanism of change on a 7-point Likert Scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". Specifically, we asked participants: How capable they feel about managing negative thoughts If they will intentionally spend time doing activities they enjoy If they will notice and appreciate good things |
Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
|
Ability to Cope with COVID-19
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
2 questions related to their ability to cope with stressors over the upcoming weeks (including challenges relating to COVID-19). Participants answered these questions on a 7-point Likert Scale, from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". Specifically, we asked participants: if they will be able to handle lifestyle changes due to the coronavirus, if the pandemic will have an extremely negative impact on their life. |
Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
|
Secondary Control
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
We asked participants three items to assess secondary control (Weisz et al., 2010). The items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("Very false") to 3 ("Very true"). The three items are: When something bad happens, I can find a way to think about it that makes me feel better. After a really hard day, I can make myself feel better by remembering some good things that happened. When bad things happen to me that I can't control, there are lots of things I can do to feel better. Higher scores indicate greater secondary control. |
Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
|
Perceived Utility
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Participants were asked to rate three items relating to the perceived utility of each module. Specifically, we asked participants: How helpful the module was How engaging the module was How much they will continue applying content from the module Higher scores indicate greater perceived utility. |
Immediately after the intervention
|
|
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
Questionnaire measuring positive affect and negative affect.
Scores on the positive affect subscale range from 10-50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect.
Scores on the negative affect subscale range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect
|
Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
|
Perceived Stress Scale-4
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
Questionnaire measuring perceived stress.
Scores range from 0-16, with higher scores indicating greater stress.
|
Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
|
The Social Connectedness Scale
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
Questionnaire measuring social connectedness.
Scores range from 8 to 48, with higher scores indicating greater social connectedness.
|
Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 843879
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.