Multicenter Prospective Cohort of Informal Caregivers in Burgundy and Franche-Comté (ICE)

Multicenter Prospective Cohort of Informal Caregivers in Burgundy-Franche-Comté. ICE Cohort (Informal Caregivers of Elderly)

Medical progress and modification of lifestyles have prolonged life expectancy, despite the development of chronic diseases. The support and care are often provided by a network of informal caregivers composed of family, friends, and neighbors. They became essential to help maintening the elderly persons to live at home. It has been demonstrated that the importance and the diversity of informal tasks may jeopardize their own physical, mental and social well-being.

The aim of the Informal Carers of Elderly Cohort is to define, through a longitudinal study of their life course, the profiles of caregivers of patients with a diagnosis of one of the following diseases: cancer (breast, prostate, colon-rectum), neuro-degenerative diseases (Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's and similar diseases), neuro-vascular diseases (Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)), Age-related Macular Degeneration(AMD) and heart disease (heart failure), aged ≥ 60 years old and living in Burgundy or Franche-Comte. By following the different phases of the caregiving relationship from the announcement of the diagnosis, it will be possible to assess the quality of life of caregivers and evaluate the implementation of a pragmatic social action to help informal caregivers through a randomized intervention trial nested in the cohort.

Thanks to an analytical and longitudinal definition of the profiles of informal caregivers, this study could gather precise information on their life courses and their health trajectory by identifying the consequences associated with the concept of their role of aid in care. In addition, the randomized intervention trial will explore the efficacy, in terms of quality of life, and efficiency of a social action to support the caregivers. These data will allow to identify strategies that could be used to improve the existing sources of aid and to propose new approaches to help caregivers. This study will provide the opportunity to identify the most relevant means of support and to give an impulse for new healthcare policies.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

186

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Besançon, France, 25030
        • CHRU de Besançon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Patient :

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be able to identify a principal caregiver via a specific questionnaire (if the patient is unable to identify himself his caregiver due to the disease, a self-designation form as a principal caregiver will be allow and propose)
  • to accept to complete the questionnaire to designate the principal caregiver;
  • To live in either Burgundy-Franche-Comte county;
  • have been recently diagnosed at hospital or in private-sector for the following diseases: Local or metastatic cancer diagnosed less than 6 month (breast cancer-hormone sensitive- in first line chemotherapy treatment, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer or in metastatic recurrence after 3 years of remission, considered as a new case, colorectal cancer in first line chemotherapy treatment), a neuro-degenerative disease (Parkinson disease diagnosed less than 7 years, Alzheimer disease and similar diseases diagnosed less than 12 months and /or with a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)<24 and >10 (performed less than 3 mois)), Age-related Macular Degeneration,( geographic atrophy or neovascular, diagnosed less than 12 month with an acuity range between 2 and 6/10e, be at least 65 years old and have received less than 3 sessions of intravitreal injections (IVT)), cardiac disease (heart failure diagnosed less than 3 months), neuro-vascular disease (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with clinical evidence of post stroke lesions upper than 24 hours, diagnosed less than 6 months and with a Rankin's score inferior or equal to 2).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previously diagnosed with another targeted disease and/or living in retirement home could not be included

Caregiver

Inclusion Criteria:

  • to be a member of the patient's social environment (family, friend and neighbor);
  • to be identify by the patient as the "principal caregiver" based on the designation questionnaire or to have complete the self-designation form as a principal caregiver;
  • ≥ 18 years old;
  • not be an employee of a healthcare organization;
  • living in Burgundy-Franche-Comte;
  • to be able to complete questionnaires,

Exclusion Criteria:

- to be under guardianship, curatorship or under the protection of justice

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interventional arm
'Support provided by social worker'
Caregivers randomized in intervention arm will receive an information booklet (which informs about existing structures and actions) and will receive support provided by a social worker schedule every 6 months during two years. The support duration will be one hour and will be defined as two parts: administration of the LASA questionnaire, and a standardized semi directive interview to assess needs.
Caregivers will only receive an information booklet (which informs about existing structures and actions)
Other: Non-interventional arm
'Information booklet receipt'
Caregivers will only receive an information booklet (which informs about existing structures and actions)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
(Interventional Study) Comparison of caregivers' HRQoL according to the allocated intervention by randomization based on summaries score the MOS SF36
Time Frame: One year after randomization
The main objective of the randomized study is to compare the Health Related Quality of Life based on summaries score the MOS SF36 one year after randomization according to the allocated intervention.
One year after randomization
(Observational study) Changes in HRQoL of patients' caregivers using the MOS SF36 questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15,18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60 months post-randomization
The main objective of the observational study is to define the longitudinal profiles of patient's caregivers according to the evaluation of their HRQoL using the MOS SF36 questionnaire
At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15,18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60 months post-randomization
(Observational study) Changes in HRQoL of cancer patients' caregivers using the CarGoQoL questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48,54 and 60 months post-randomization
the aim of the observational study is to define the longitudinal profiles of cancer patient's caregivers according to the evaluation of their HRQoL using the CarGoQoL questionnaire
At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48,54 and 60 months post-randomization
(Observational study) Changes in the coping strategies of patients' caregivers using the Borteyrou, Rascle and Truchot Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-randomization
The aim of the observational study is to define the longitudinal profiles of patient's caregivers according to the evaluation of their coping strategies using the Borteyrou, Rascle and Truchot Questionnaire.
At 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-randomization
(Observational study) Changes in feelings of anxiety and depression of patients' caregivers according to the HADs questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48,54 and 60 months post-randomization
The aim of the observational study is to define the longitudinal profiles of patient's caregivers according to the evaluation of their anxiety and depression according to the HADs questionnaire.
At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48,54 and 60 months post-randomization
(Observational study) Changes in social support of patients' caregivers using the SSQ6 questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-randomization
The aim of the observational study is to define the longitudinal profiles of patient's caregivers according to the evaluation of their social support using the SSQ6 questionnaire.
At 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-randomization
(Observational study) Changes in burden of patients' caregivers using the Zarit burden inventory
Time Frame: At 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-randomization
The aim of the observational study is to define the longitudinal profiles of patient's caregivers according to the evaluation burden using the Zarit burden inventory
At 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
(Interventional Study) Comparison of caregivers' HRQoL according to the intervention allocated by randomization based on summaries score the MOS SF36
Time Frame: Two years after randomization
To compare the Health Related Quality of Life based on summaries score the MOS SF36 two years after randomization according to the allocated intervention.
Two years after randomization
(Interventional Study) Changes in HRQoL of patients' caregivers according to the allocated intervention using the MOS SF36 questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15,18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60 months post-randomization
To compare longitudinally all dimensions of HRQoL using the MOS SF36 questionnaire according to the allocated intervention.
At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15,18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60 months post-randomization
(Interventional Study) Changes in HRQoL of cancer patients' caregivers according to the allocated intervention using the CarGoQol questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48,54 and 60 months post-randomization
To compare longitudinally the HRQoL of cancer patients' caregivers, according to the allocated intervention, using the CarGoQol questionnaire.
At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48,54 and 60 months post-randomization
(Interventionnal Study) Changes in the coping strategies of patients' caregivers according to the allocated intervention using the Borteyrou, Rascle and Truchot Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-randomization
To compare longitudinally the coping strategies of patients' caregivers, according to the allocated intervention, using the Borteyrou, Rascle and Truchot Questionnaire.
At 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-randomization
(Interventional Study) Changes in feelings of anxiety and depression of patients' caregivers according to the allocated intervention using the HADs Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48,54 and 60 months post-randomization
To compare longitudinally the feelings of anxiety and depression of patients' caregivers, according to the allocated intervention, using the HADs Questionnaire.
At 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48,54 and 60 months post-randomization
(Interventional Study) Changes in social supports of patients' caregivers according to the allocated intervention using the SSQ6 questionnaire
Time Frame: At 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-randomization
To compare longitudinally the social support of patients' caregivers, according to the allocated intervention, using the SSQ6 questionnaire.
At 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-randomization
(Interventional Study) Changes in burden of patients' caregivers according to the allocated intervention using the Zarit burden inventory
Time Frame: At 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-randomization
To compare longitudinally the burden of patients' caregivers, according to the allocated intervention, using the Zarit burden inventory.
At 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-randomization
(Interventional study) Efficiency of the intervention of a social worker for caregivers using a cost-utility analysis
Time Frame: At 1, 3, 6,9,12,15,18 and 24 months post-randomization
The efficiency of the intervention of a social worker for caregivers will be assessed using a cost-utility analysis, aiming at comparing in terms of costs and utility the intervention versus the absence of intervention of a social worker
At 1, 3, 6,9,12,15,18 and 24 months post-randomization
(Observational study) Changes in the caregivers/patients' relationship using a qualitative approach (semi-structure interview)
Time Frame: At 1,6,12,18,24,30,36,42,48,54 and 60 months post randomization
to evaluate the caregivers/patients' relationship and the changes of the relationship using a qualitative approach (semi-structure interview), to describe the specificity of the care and of the help from people carrying diseases with behavioral disorders (Alzheimer-type dementia in particular)
At 1,6,12,18,24,30,36,42,48,54 and 60 months post randomization
(Observational study) Changes in the role of caregiver due to a situation generating a rupture (entry into an institution or death, disease remission) using a qualitative approach (semi-structure interview)
Time Frame: At 1,6,12,18,24,30,36,42,48,54 and 60 months post randomization
to study the situations generating a rupture in their role of caregiver (entry into an institution or death, disease remission) using a qualitative approach (semi-structure interview)
At 1,6,12,18,24,30,36,42,48,54 and 60 months post randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

December 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe