Validity of Patient-Collected Wet Mounts

Purpose/Objectives: To compare wet mount findings for clue cells, yeast, trichomonads and white blood cells per high-power field in self-collected vaginal specimens, compared to clinician-collected specimens, among symptomatic women visiting the San Antonio Metropolitan Health sexually transmitted disease clinic.

Research Design/Plan: Prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded trial

Methods: Obtain informed consent and specimens from 40 symptomatic adult females (eg abnormal discharge, odor and/or itching). Calculate concordance between clinician- and patient-collected samples using a Wilcoxon Matched-Pair test. Calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the patient-collected wet mount, using the clinician-collected specimens as the "gold standard."

Clinical Relevance: A "wet mount," or microscopic examination, is commonly used to diagnose trichomoniasis and yeast in females, and constitutes one diagnostic element for bacterial vaginosis. While patient-collected vaginal swabs are acceptable for nucleic acid probe tests for chlamydia and gonorrhea and nucleic acid probe tests for trichomoniasis little information about patient-collected wet mounts exists in the literature. Self-collection by women before being seen by a clinician can increase the speed and efficiency of the visit. The method is highly acceptable to women. In the investigators' clinic, women routinely collect their own gonorrhea and chlamydia swabs, so adding an additional swab would not be burdensome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Studies have shown that self-collection of vaginal swabs is highly acceptable to women. Studies have also shown that patient-collected vaginal swabs are acceptable for nucleic acid probe tests for chlamydia and gonorrhea and nucleic acid probe tests for trichomoniasis; however, little information about patient-collected wet mounts exists in the literature.

The investigators' goal is to compare wet mount findings for clue cells, yeast, trichomonads and white blood cells per high-power field in self-collected vaginal specimens, compared to clinician-collected specimens, among symptomatic women visiting the San Antonio Metropolitan Health sexually transmitted disease clinic. Self-collection by women before being seen by a clinician can increase the speed and efficiency of the visit. In the investigators' clinic, women routinely collect their own gonorrhea and chlamydia swabs, so adding an additional swab would not be burdensome. Based on the reliability of patient-collected swabs for nucleic amplification tests, it is expected that patient-collected wet mounts could be as valid as conventionally collected samples.

Step-by-Step Methods: Potential study participants as described above will be approached by research staff while in the waiting area. If a patient provides informed consent, she will self-collect a wet mount specimen by inserting a cotton-tip swab in the vagina about 2 inches and rotating for 10-30 seconds; later, her clinician will collect a second specimen from the vaginal fornix and place it in a red-top tube with a small amount of normal saline. The clinician-collected sample will be labeled with the patient's identifying information and processed in the usual way by laboratory staff, with results recorded in electronic medical records. The patient-collected sample will be identified by a number only, and results recorded in a study log. The study is complete when the results of 40 patient- and clinician-collected swabs are recorded.

Data Analysis Plan: Concordance between clinician- and patient-collected samples will be calculated using a Wilcoxon Matched-Pair test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the patient-collected wet mount will also be calculated, using the clinician-collected specimens as the "gold standard."

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78205
        • San Antonio Metropolitan Health District

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult,
  • nonpregnant
  • females
  • with vaginal complaint (ie abnormal discharge, odor, itching)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • minors <18 yo
  • pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: All subjects
All patients enrolled in this study will self-collect a vaginal swab (experimental) then have a physician collected vaginal swab (gold standard)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concordance of patient-collected and clinician-collected wet mounts
Time Frame: to be reviewed immediately at time of collection, documented and specimens discarded. No ongoing comparison, this will only be a single point in time comparison between the physician collected specimen and the patient collected specimen.
Assess for concordance of clue cells, yeast, trichomonads and white blood cells per high-power field between patient collected vaginal swab and physician collected vaginal swab.
to be reviewed immediately at time of collection, documented and specimens discarded. No ongoing comparison, this will only be a single point in time comparison between the physician collected specimen and the patient collected specimen.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Junda Woo, MD, MPH, San Antonio Metropolitan Health District

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 29, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 26, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Candidiasis

Clinical Trials on vaginal swab

3
Subscribe