Evaluation and Neural Basis of Communication in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (COGNISEP)

July 24, 2020 updated by: Philippe Gallien, Pôle Saint Hélier

Multiple sclerosis (MS) progressively leads to an increasing level of disability. That's why individuals faced with this chronic disease whose progression is unpredictable have to mobilize all their available resources. As a result, management of interpersonal relationships appears to be a key issue in adjustment to situations.

Although knowledge on cognitive abnormalities in MS has been growing in recent years, there is a lack of research about social behaviour regulation skills. The few studies conducted in this field are mainly interested in emotional processing (emotional facial recognition and empathy) and skills mentalizing (theory of mind) that appear disturbed in MS.

While some recent studies touch on the issue of the contextual analysis of language (that is to say, the social use of language) in MS, their assessment on a wide range of pragamtic skills has never been studied. However, the pragmatic aspects of language are known to play a major role in social adjustment.

This project has three main objectives : (1) to increase general knowledge of deficits in communication and in social cognition in patients with MS, (2) to propose new leads for the evaluation of these disorders and (3) to contribute to increasing knowledge of neural basis of communication and social cognition.

In order to address those objectives, the assessment will be focused on many various pragmatics skills : conversation, indirect language comprehension (indirect questions, idiomatic expressions, sarcasm) and metapragmatic knowledge in a population of 40 RR-MS patients. Those patients' performances will be compared to a group of healthy matched control subjects, potential relationships between pragmatic abilities, other aspects of social cognition (theory of mind and processing of emotional stimuli), cognitive functioning, psycho-behavioural aspects and the characteristics of the disease will be explore.

Social cognition tasks have been selected for their dynamic and ecologic aspects in order to match natural social interaction.

Finally, communication consideration, cognitive and cerebral skills of patients with MS will contribute to increasing knowledge of the neural basis of social cognition.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bretagne
      • Rennes, Bretagne, France, 35000
        • Pole Saint Helier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Relapsing-remitting form as defined by the Mc Donald's Committee criteria (2005).
  • EDSS between 0 and 5.5, out of relapses
  • French mother tongue or having been schooled in France
  • No disorders of formal language comprehension
  • Not having participated to a similar protocol within the 9 months preceding the inclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 40 patients with multiple sclerosis
The study sample will consist of 40 patients with multiple sclerosis. MS patients and control subjects will be recruited on the Rennes (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire and Pôle de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation Saint-Hélier) and Angers sites (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire) participating in COGNISEP project
Other: 40 healthy subjects
All the performance of the 40 MS patients will be compared to 40 control subjects matched in age, gender and sociocultural level. Subjects with a history of neurological and psychiatric condition or substance abuse will be excluded from the study. Control subjects will receive an honorary as a token for their time.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
conversation test
Time Frame: fist day of the assessment
The objective of this task is to assess the verbal communication skills of MS patients in a 10-minute natural conversation (various conversation topics appropriated to the participant's age will be inserted in the conversation). Different performance indexes will be analyzed in this task: amount of verbal exchanges between both interlocutors (number of turn-taking and statements), adjustment to the examiner's requests, topic changes and topic continuity. With the use of the validated observation grid ("protocole Montréal d'évaluation de la Communication"), it will be possible to measure the frequency of occurrence or intensity of communicative behaviours
fist day of the assessment
indirect langage comprehension
Time Frame: second day of the assesment
This computer-based task assesses the MS patients' ability to understand indirect statements. Three forms of indirect language will be tested in this protocol: indirect requests, idiomatic expressions and sarcasms (12 items per language forms). Each item consists of a story (3 pictures with an audio-recorded text) where at least 2 characters appear in everyday life situations. The participant has to choose the end of the story from the four options (pragmatic evaluation) and to justify his/her answer (metapragmatic evaluation). The performance indexes used are the total number of correct answers, the total number of correct answers by linguistic form and the number of central justifications by correct answer, showing metapragmatic knowledge.
second day of the assesment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on cognitive evaluation

3
Subscribe