Deafness and Cognition in Middle-aged Adults (SURDICOG)

September 12, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Impact of Severe to Profound Deafness on Cognitive Functions in Middle-aged Adults

A mild cognitive impairment was observed in 50% of cochlear implant candidates aged 65 years and over, compared to 5-19% in general population. No studies analysed cognition in patients younger than 65 years. The aim of our study was to compare cognitive function between patients with severe and profound hearing loss and patients with normal hearing in patients aged 45 to 64 years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This case-control study will include 180 middle aged adults (90 cases, 90 healthy controls) matched on sex, age, education level in order to find an association between severe and profound hearing loss and presence of mild cognitive impairment.

90 subjects with severe to profound hearing loss,, with a maximum speech intelligibility of 70% for Fournier's disyllabic words in silence with properly fitted hearing aids could be included. Cognition evaluated on a battery of 5 tests, depression and dependance will be compared to healthy controls with normal hearing on pure-tone audiometry (as function of ISO 7029 reference) The subjects (cases and controls) will be recruited in the ENT consultation from the Cochlear Implant Center (Unité fonctionnelle implants auditifs, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Head: Dr Isabelle Mosnier)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Recruiting
        • Centre de Recherche en Audiologie (CReA) - Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cases: Patients aged between 45 to 64 years with severe to profound bilateral post-lingual sensorineural hearing loss with a maximum intelligibility of 70% (disyllabic words) in free-field silence with hearing aids at 60 dB SPL, current in french
  • Controls: normal hearing subjects matched on age, sex and education level

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Associated disability that prevents the tests from being performed
  • Past and current history of neurological and psychiatric disorders including meningitis
  • Psychotropic drug treatment
  • Vulnerable subject

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cases: Patients with severe to profound hearing loss
Patients aged between 45 to 64 years with severe to profound bilateral post-lingual sensorineural hearing loss with a maximum intelligibility of 70% (disyllabic words) in free-field silence with hearing aids at 60 dB SPL

For both Patients and controls:

  • Cognitive functions evaluation
  • Tonal and vocal audiometry
  • Self questionnaires
Active Comparator: Controls: 90 matched subjects with normal hearing
Healthy controls aged between 45 to 64 years with normal hearing on pure-tone audiometry (as function of ISO 7029 reference)

For both Patients and controls:

  • Cognitive functions evaluation
  • Tonal and vocal audiometry
  • Self questionnaires

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of Mini Mental State Examination to access cognitive impairment in patients with severe to profound hearing loss compare to subjects with normal hearing
Time Frame: 1 day
test to assess cognitive impairment. Result of this test is expressed on 30 points and is analyzed in function of age, sex, education level depending on publicised norms.
1 day
Evaluation of Trail making tests (TMT) A et B to evaluate executive functions in patients with severe to profound hearing loss compare to subjects with normal hearing
Time Frame: 1 day
Trail making tests (TMT) A et B: rapidity test to evaluate executive functions. Score is expressed correct displacement number (in A and B parts) divided by time and multiply by ten.
1 day
Evaluation of "Fluences verbales sémantique et phonémique" to evaluate linguistic skills in patients with severe to profound hearing loss compare to subjects with normal hearing
Time Frame: 1 day
"Fluences verbales sémantique et phonémique": test to evaluate linguistic skills. Score correspond to the number of words cited in 60 minutes in a specific category.
1 day
Evaluation of 16-item Free and Cue Selective Recall Test (RLRI/16) to evaluate episodic memory in patients with severe to profound hearing loss compare to subjects with normal hearing
Time Frame: 1 day
16-item Free and Cue Selective Recall Test (RLRI/16): test adapted in French from the Free and Cue Selective Reminding test (FCSRT) assessing episodic memory. After an encoding phase during which the subject reads and memorizes 16 words 4 by 4, the subject is asked to freely recall as many words as possible in 2 minutes, cues are then provided. The free and cue recall is repeated 3 times and then 20 minutes later (delayed recall). The score used in the study will be: sum of the immediate free recall of the first three trials (0 to 48) and score of the delayed free recall (0 to 16)
1 day
Evaluation of Digit Symbol Substitution Test to evaluate psychomotor speed and executive functions, executive functions in patients with severe to profound hearing loss compare to subjects with normal hearing
Time Frame: 1 day
Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) of the Weschsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV (WAIS-IV): test assessing attention, psychomotor speed and executive functions, executive functions. This test presents a matrix of nine digit-symbol pairs on a sheet of paper. A list of 135 numbers is presented in random order. The subject must associate the symbol corresponding to the number as quickly as possible by following the matrix. The score used will be: number of correctly associated symbols in 90 seconds
1 day
Evaluation of Instrumental activities of daily living scale to evaluate the level of dependence of dependence of the subjects in patients with severe to profound hearing loss compare to subjects with normal hearing
Time Frame: 1 day
Instrumental activities of daily living scale (IADL): evaluation of the level of dependence of dependence of the subjects [45] (addendum 2). Patients with MCI must remain independent. The existence of dependence contributes to the diagnosis of of dementia
1 day
Evaluation of Cognitive Complaint Questionnaire to evaluate Cognitive assessment in patients with severe to profound hearing loss compare to subjects with normal hearing
Time Frame: 1 day
Assessment or monitoring to be instituted for a score of 3 or more, and/or one "yes" answer to question 5, and/or two "yes" answers to questions: A,4,5,7,8.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Type of MCI
Time Frame: 1 day
Evaluate the type of MCI (amnesic, dysexecutive, multidomain)
1 day
Impact of the severity of the hearing loss on presence and severity of cognitive disorders
Time Frame: 1 day
Subjective evaluation of hearing noise based on Speech and spatial questionnary : Patients have to mark a scale, for example with a cross, at the right place between 0 and 10. A mark on the value 10 means that he is perfectly capable of doing or experiencing what is described in the corresponding question. A mark on the 0 indicates that he/she is hardly able to do or experience what is described.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Isabelle Dr MOSNIER, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 24, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 24, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All data will be collected and analysed into the GH Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment in Middle-aged Adults

Clinical Trials on Cognitive and audiometry evaluation

Subscribe