Evaluation of N1539 Following Abdominoplasty Surgery

January 17, 2018 updated by: Baudax Bio

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of N1539 Following Abdominoplasty Surgery

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of N1539 in subjects with acute moderate to severe pain following abdominoplasty surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

219

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Pasadena, California, United States
        • Lotus Clinical Research, LLC
    • Texas
      • Bellaire, Texas, United States
        • Research Concepts
      • Bellaire, Texas, United States
        • HD Research
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
        • Endeavor Clinical Trials

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Voluntarily provide written informed consent.
  • Male or female between 18 and 75 years of age, inclusive.
  • Be scheduled to undergo elective abdominoplasty surgery without collateral procedures.
  • Be American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical class 1 or 2.
  • Female subject are eligible only if all the following apply:

    • Not pregnant;
    • Not lactating;
    • Not planning to become pregnant during the study;
    • Commit to the use of an acceptable form of birth control for the duration of the study.
  • Have a body mass index ≤35 kg/m2
  • Be able to understand the study procedures, comply with all study procedures, and agree to participate in the study program.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a known allergy to meloxicam or any excipient of N1539, D5W, aspirin, other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or to any peri- or postoperative medications used in this study.
  • Have a clinically significant abnormal clinical laboratory test value.
  • Have history of or positive test results for HIV, or hepatitis B or C.
  • Have a history or clinical manifestations of significant renal, hepatic, cardiovascular, metabolic, neurologic, psychiatric, or other condition that would preclude participation in the study.
  • Have a history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft surgery within the preceding 12 months
  • Have a history of migraine or frequent headaches, seizures, or are currently taking anticonvulsants.
  • Have active or recent (within 6 months) gastrointestinal ulceration or bleeding.
  • Have a known bleeding disorder or be taking agents affecting coagulation.
  • Have another painful physical condition that may confound the assessments of post operative pain.
  • Have evidence of a clinically significant 12 lead ECG abnormality.
  • Have a history of alcohol abuse (regularly drinks > 4 units of alcohol per day; 8 oz. beer, 3 oz. wine, 1 oz. spirits) within the past 5 years or a history of prescription/illicit drug abuse.
  • Have positive results on the urine drug screen or alcohol breath test indicative of illicit drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Have been receiving or have received chronic opioid therapy defined as greater than 15 morphine equivalents units per day for greater than 3 out of 7 days per week over a one-month period within 12 months of surgery.
  • Use concurrent therapy that could interfere with the evaluation of efficacy or safety, such as any drugs which in the investigator's opinion may exert significant analgesic properties or act synergistically with N1539.
  • Unable to discontinue medications, that have not been at a stable dose for at least 14 days prior to the scheduled bunionectomy procedure, within 5 half lives of the specific prior medication (or, if half life is not known, within 48 hours) before dosing with study medication.
  • Have utilized corticosteroids, either systemically or by intra-articular injection, within 6 weeks prior to the surgical procedure.
  • Have received any investigational product within 30 days before dosing with study medication.
  • Be receiving warfarin, lithium, or a combination of furosemide with either an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker
  • Be currently receiving treatment with oral meloxicam (Mobic®) within 7 days prior to surgery
  • Have previously received N1539 in clinical trials, or had major surgery in the last 3 months that would interfere with study outcomes or increase the risk of study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: N1539 30mg
N1539 (Intravenous meloxicam) 30mg every 24 hours for up to 3 doses.
Other Names:
  • Intravenous meloxicam
Placebo Comparator: IV Placebo
IV Placebo every 24 hours for up to 3 doses.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Summed Pain Intensity Difference Over the First 24 Hours (SPID24)
Time Frame: 24 Hours
Pain intensity was recorded using a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (Range 0-10) where 0 equates to no pain (better), and 10 equates to the worst pain imaginable (worse). Pain intensity scores were to be recorded at the following time points: 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, and 2 hours post Dose 1. Thereafter pain assessments were to be recorded every 2 hours until 48 hours post Dose 1. Pain intensity differences from baseline at each time point were calculated and a time weighted summed pain intensity difference (SPID) was then calculated. Time weighted SPID calculations were computed by multiplying a weight factor to each score prior to summation. The weight factor at each time point was the time elapsed since the previous observation. A smaller SPID value (i.e. more negative) was better.
24 Hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) at Other Intervals
Time Frame: 48 Hours
Pain intensity was recorded using a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (Range 0-10) where 0 equates to no pain (better), and 10 equates to the worst pain imaginable (worse). Pain intensity scores were to be recorded at the following time points: 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, and 2 hours post Dose 1. Thereafter pain assessments were to be recorded every 2 hours until 48 hours post Dose 1. Pain intensity differences from baseline at each time point were calculated and a time weighted summed pain intensity difference (SPID) was then calculated. Time weighted SPID calculations were computed by multiplying a weight factor to each score prior to summation. The weight factor at each time point was the time elapsed since the previous observation. A smaller SPID value (i.e. more negative) was better.
48 Hours
Time to First Dose of Rescue Analgesia
Time Frame: 48 Hours
Rescue analgesia (oral oxycodone 5 mg) was available to subjects with inadequately controlled pain upon request. Time to first rescue was calculated as the elapsed time from administration of Dose 1 to the administration of the first dose of rescue analgesia.
48 Hours
Number of Subjects Utilizing Rescue Analgesia
Time Frame: 48 Hours
Rescue analgesia (oral oxycodone 5 mg) was available to subjects with inadequately controlled pain upon request.
48 Hours
Number of Doses of Rescue Analgesia Utilized Per Subject
Time Frame: 48 Hours
Rescue analgesia (oral oxycodone 5 mg) was available to subjects with inadequately controlled pain upon request.
48 Hours
Time to Perceptible Pain Relief (TTPPR)
Time Frame: 12 Hours
Time to perceptible and meaningful pain relief was measured using the double stopwatch method. For each randomized subject, two stopwatches were started immediately after administration of the first study dose (Hour 0). The subject was to stop the first watch when they first perceived pain relief to occur (time to perceptible relief). Once the first watch was stopped, the second stopwatch was given to the subject with the instructions to stop the watch when they first experienced meaningful pain relief (time to meaningful relief).
12 Hours
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (TTMPR)
Time Frame: 12 Hours
Time to perceptible and meaningful pain relief was measured using the double stopwatch method. For each randomized subject, two stopwatches were started immediately after administration of the first study dose (Hour 0). The subject was to stop the first watch when they first perceived pain relief to occur (time to perceptible relief). Once the first watch was stopped, the second stopwatch was given to the subject with the instructions to stop the watch when they first experienced meaningful pain relief (time to meaningful relief).
12 Hours
Subjects With ≥ 30% Improvement in Pain From Baseline to Hour 6
Time Frame: 6 Hours
Percent improvement in pain is the cumulative pain intensity percent reduction from baseline over the defined interval (6 or 24 hours), calculated as SPID for the defined interval (SPID6 or SPID24) divided by the baseline pain intensity (BaselinePI) extrapolated across that interval. Example: % Improvement through Hour 6 = 100 * SPID6 / (BaselinePI * 6 * 60), and SPID6 < 0 as an indication for improvement.
6 Hours
Subjects With ≥ 50% Improvement in Pain From Baseline to Hour 6
Time Frame: 6 Hours
Percent improvement in pain is the cumulative pain intensity percent reduction from baseline over the defined interval (6 or 24 hours), calculated as SPID for the defined interval (SPID6 or SPID24) divided by the baseline pain intensity (BaselinePI) extrapolated across that interval. Example: % Improvement through Hour 6 = 100 * SPID6 / (BaselinePI * 6 * 60), and SPID6 < 0 as an indication for improvement.
6 Hours
Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Pain Control at Hour 24
Time Frame: 24 Hours
PGA of pain control was evaluated at Hour 24 and Hour 48 with subject reported degree of pain control over the preceding interval according to a 5 point scale (0-4) with categories of 0-poor, 1-fair, 2-good, 3-very good, or 4-excellent.
24 Hours
Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Pain Control at Hour 48
Time Frame: 48 Hours
PGA of pain control was evaluated at Hour 24 and Hour 48 with subject reported degree of pain control over the preceding interval according to a 5 point scale (0-4) with categories of 0-poor, 1-fair, 2-good, 3-very good, or 4-excellent.
48 Hours
Subjects With ≥ 30% Improvement in Pain From Baseline to Hour 24
Time Frame: 24 Hours

Percent improvement in pain is the cumulative pain intensity percent reduction from baseline over the defined interval (6 or 24 hours), calculated as SPID for the defined interval (SPID6 or SPID24) divided by the baseline pain intensity (BaselinePI) extrapolated across that interval. Example: % Improvement through Hour 24 = 100 * SPID24 / (BaselinePI

* 24 * 60), and SPID24 < 0 as an indication for improvement.

24 Hours
Subjects With ≥ 50% Improvement in Pain From Baseline to Hour 24
Time Frame: 24 Hours

Percent improvement in pain is the cumulative pain intensity percent reduction from baseline over the defined interval (6 or 24 hours), calculated as SPID for the defined interval (SPID6 or SPID24) divided by the baseline pain intensity (BaselinePI) extrapolated across that interval. Example: % Improvement through Hour 24 = 100 * SPID24 / (BaselinePI

* 24 * 60), and SPID24 < 0 as an indication for improvement.

24 Hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Post-operative

Clinical Trials on N1539

3
Subscribe