- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02703844
Vestibular Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease
October 28, 2022 updated by: University of Kent
Caloric Vestibular Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease
The purpose of this study is to determine whether caloric vestibular stimulation improves symptoms of Parkinson's Disease.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a nationwide public health problem, inflicting a complex constellation of physical and neuropsychiatric symptoms which are shown to progress with time.
This research will investigate the potential of caloric vestibular stimulation (CVS), a non-invasive form of brain stimulation, as a treatment for individuals who suffer from Parkinson's Disease.
Investigators will investigate whether core cognitive and physiological deficits are responsive to stimulation by comparing participants' performance on behavioral and physiological measures after baseline and either active or placebo stimulation phases with the aim of drawing initial insights into the application of CVS within this population.
The study design is based on a single-case study that recently demonstrated durable, clinically meaningful gains in the motor and nonmotor symptoms of PD.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
46
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Kent
-
Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom, CT2 7NP
- University of Kent
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 95 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants must be diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's Disease as defined by the UK PDS Brain Bank Criteria.
- Participants must report limitations to Activities of Daily Life (ADL, UPDRS subscale 2)
- Capacity to consent to the study
- Motivated to comply with the protocol
- An understanding of English sufficient to comply with the protocol
- Spouse/ carer willing to support the participant throughout the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of induced Parkinson's or essential/dystonic tremor
- Premorbid psychiatric history (including affective disorder, psychosis or deliberate self- harm)
- Previous exposure to neurostimulation
- Inner ear pathology
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Active
Participants will be receiving an active Caloric Vestibular Stimulation treatment for a duration of 8 weeks, 7 days a week, twice daily for 19 minutes.
|
Stimulation of the vestibular nerves
|
|
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Participants will be receiving a Sham Caloric Vestibular Stimulation treatment for a duration of 8 weeks in the same manner as the active arm: 7 days a week, twice daily for 19 minutes. Individuals allocated to this arm will be later crossed over, in unblinded fashion, to the active arm if the treatment shows evidence of efficacy and safety. |
Sham stimulation of the vestibular nerves
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Nonmotor Symptom Severity Scale (NMSS)
Time Frame: Change at end of treatment (week 12) relative to the average of two baseline visits
|
The NMSS is a 30-item rater-based scale to assess a wide range of non-motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).
The NMSS measures the severity and frequency of non-motor symptoms across nine dimensions.
Score range of 0-360, with 0 being no symptom burden
|
Change at end of treatment (week 12) relative to the average of two baseline visits
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II: Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living
Time Frame: Change at end of treatment (week 12) relative to baseline average
|
The MDS-UPDRS Part II is a 13-item patient-reported assessment of activities of motor aspects of experiences of daily living.
Scores range between 0-52, with the higher score indicating greater impairment to activities of daily living
|
Change at end of treatment (week 12) relative to baseline average
|
|
Change From Baseline in the MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III: Motor Examination
Time Frame: Change at end of treatment (week 12) relative to baseline average
|
The MDS-UPDRS Part III is a 33-item assessment of motor function evaluated by a trained blinded rater.
Scores range between 0-132 with higher scores indicating more severe motor symptoms
|
Change at end of treatment (week 12) relative to baseline average
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction, with a score range from zero to 30, with higher being closer to normal
|
Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
a brief measure that is commonly used to assess daytime sleepiness in PD and other disorders.
Scores can range from 0 to 24.
The higher the score, the higher that person's average daytime sleepiness
|
Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Modified Schwab & England
Time Frame: Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
clinical outcome assessment of an individual's ability to function in activities of daily living
|
Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 2 Minute Walk
Time Frame: Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
performance measure of walking ability and functional capacity
|
Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 10 Meter Walk
Time Frame: Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
performance measure used to assess walking speed
|
Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Time Frame: Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
measures gait and the probability of falls in adults
|
Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Severity Scale
Time Frame: Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
questionnaire for evaluating the impact of fatigue.
scores range from 9-63 with a higher score for greater fatigue.
|
Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
|
Change From Baseline in the EuroQol 5D
Time Frame: Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
questionnaire for use in clinical and economic appraisal and population health.
scores range from 0-100 for each question with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best
|
Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
|
Change From Baseline in the SF-12 Health Survey
Time Frame: Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
self-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of health on an individual's everyday life.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning
|
Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
self-rating scale developed to assess psychological distress.
scores range between 0-21 with higher scores equaling more severe impairment
|
Change at one-month post-treatment follow-up (week 17) relative to baseline average
|
|
EEG/Event - Related Potentials Abnormalities - Physiological Measurement
Time Frame: Change at end of treatment (week 12) relative to baseline
|
Assessment of any changes to P300 during ERPs and beta wave in a resting state.
|
Change at end of treatment (week 12) relative to baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Nicole Palmer, University of Kent (research ethics & governance lead)
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
October 9, 2017
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
July 21, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 8, 2016
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
March 9, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
October 31, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 28, 2022
Last Verified
October 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KENT/DW/PD/2016
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
De-identified individual participant data for all clinical outcome measures have been made available.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The data is available in an online repository.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
The data is provided in an open-access format.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.