Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-eluting Balloons for Below the Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease

May 11, 2016 updated by: Maoquan Li, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital

The Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-eluting Balloons for the Treatment of Below the Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease as Compared to Conventional Balloon Angioplasty: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) for the treatment of below-the-knee peripheral arterial occlusive disease with conventional balloon angioplasty (BA).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Over the past decade, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) has established its position in the treatment of below the knee arterial occlusive disease with intermittent claudication and/or critical limb ischemia. However, the efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with conventional balloons, is limited by the high 12-month restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates. Local delivery of newer anti-proliferative drug via drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) has recently shown promising results in the treatment of femoropopliteal disease, and in the BTK area, a reduction in 3-month binary restenosis has been observed compared with historical controls treated with PTA. Drug eluting balloon has three potential advantages: (1) homogenous drug transfer to the vessel wall; (2) highest drug concentrations at the vessel wall at the time of injury; and (3) absence of a stent or delivery polymer.

This study sought to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of new drug (Paclitaxel)-eluting balloons (DEB) for the treatment of below the knee peripheral arterial disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

180

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200072
        • Shanghai Tenth people's hospital, Tongji university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with Peripheral vascular disease with or without diabetes.
  2. Rutherford class 2-6.
  3. Target lesions with a diameter reduction of at least 50% on angiography, and without past history of any intervention.
  4. Target vessel with 2.0--10.0mm in diameter and having a lesion of about 4cm-20cm in length.
  5. Written informed consent signed by the patients or representatives

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous bypass surgery or stent placement at the ipsilateral lower limb
  2. History of intolerance to antiplatelet therapy, heparin, or contrast media.
  3. Bleeding diathesis;
  4. Active systemic bacterial infection;
  5. Severely impaired renal function (serum creatinine level > 2.5 mg/dL.
  6. Expected survival time of less than 24 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Drug eluting balloon angioplasty
Paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty
In the DEB group, the guide wire will be passed through the occluded or stenosed lumen and the predilatation of the target lesion with standard balloon(s) will be performed before dilatation with a paclitaxel-eluting balloon of the diameter, at least about that of the pre-dilatation balloon (Arteryguard, Rientech, Dezhou, China). The drug eluting balloons will then be inflated according to the manufacturer recommendations. The patients will then be followed every six months for a year to compare its treatment efficacy and safety with that of conventional balloon angioplasty group.
Active Comparator: Conventional balloon angioplasty
The guide wire will be passed through the occluded or stenosed lumen and the conventional balloons will be inflated as recommended by the manufacturer. The primary and secondary outcome will then be assessed and compared with DEB group, on follow up at six and 12 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Restenosis rate
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary study endpoint was the occurrence of > 50% of restenosis in the treated vessel after 12 months as assessed by digital substraction angiography (DSA).
12 months
Peak systolic velocity ratio
Time Frame: 12 months
Peak systolic velocity ratio ≥ 2.4 by Doppler's ultrasonography was the end point of the study for the patient who did not undergo angiography after 12 months.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rutherford scale
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
Clinical success is to be defined as an improvement in Rutherford scale of at least one category after the procedure.
Immediately after procedure
ABI value
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
Hemodynamic success is to be defined as an improvement of ABI value by ≥ 0.1 after the procedure and lack of deterioration > 0.15 in relation to the maximal value recorded before the procedure.
Immediately after procedure
Residual stenosis
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
The technical success of the procedure is to be defined as PTA of a lesion with >30 % residual stenosis and lack of flow rate-limiting dissection immediately after treatment.
Immediately after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease

Clinical Trials on Drug eluting balloon angioplasty

3
Subscribe