Analysis of Coronary CT Angiography to Identify Patients With Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis (CTAAnalyzer)

June 14, 2016 updated by: National Heart Centre Singapore

Automatic Analysis of Coronary CT Angiography to Identify Patients With Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis for Clinical Decision-making.

The investigators propose to develop a computational framework involving a novel automatic image segmentation algorithm based on CTA images, an artery model reconstruction algorithm for stenosis detection, and quantification of severity of stenosis in terms of area stenosis.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common [affecting about 6% in the general adult population] cardiac disorder where a portion of the coronary artery is blocked. Among populations aged more than 65 years, the prevalence increases to 19.8%. The incidence of CHD in Singapore and other major countries is comparable. The prognosis of CHD is poor. CHD causes 1.2 million heart attacks and nearly 19% of deaths in US.[2] In Singapore, cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounted for 30.4% of all deaths in 2011, among these, 19% are due to CHD. In future, CVD deaths will increase up to 24.2 million globally in 2030. Among these, CHD deaths will change from 13.1% in 2010 to 14.9% in 2030 of all males; and from 13.6% to 13.1% of all females. The direct costs of CHD are estimated at over $87 billion and indirect cost at $70 billion in US. Unless current trends are halted or reversed, over a million people will die from CHD in US annually. Globally, the majority of CHD deaths will be in developing countries and many of the lives will be lost in middle age.

Invasive coronary angiography (ICA), is the gold standard method to delineate anatomical coronary stenosis. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement with pressure wire is the gold standard for assessment of the physiological importance of an anatomical stenosis. Non-invasive computed tomography angiography (CTA), is a diagnostic alternative to invasive coronary angiography from single and multi-centre trials.

CTA enables visualization of coronary vessels in two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) formats. Current available imaging techniques on CTA are limited in their abilities in assessing physiological stenosis. First, the commonly used percent diameter stenosis to describe the extent of coronary artery stenosis is only a modest descriptor of coronary stenosis because it does not incorporate other lesion characteristics (e.g. length, shape and eccentricity) or the effect of stenosis in series that may greatly affect the blood flow. From our preliminary study, we found that diameter stenosis weakly correlated with golden standard FFR from invasive catheterization (r = 0.30). Second, percent diameter stenosis assessment is usually given per specific coronary artery lesion, the lesions being manually identified by the expert reader. There is no method to comprehensively assess the entire coronary tree in an automated fashion without the need for manual input. We propose the development of an Automatic CTA analyzer to identify significant coronary stenosis in coronary arteries that will provide rapid triage for patients suspected of CHD. This analyzer can also facilitate disease surveillance and monitoring of therapeutic efficacy.

The proposed integrated solution is expected to achieve earlier and higher accuracy in detecting severity of coronary stenosis. From 2004 to 2007 alone, the number of annual CTA procedures in the US is around 4.7 million. In National Heart Centre Singapore, we performed more than 1000 CTA per year.

Diameter stenosis from CTA cannot determine the hemodynamic significance of the coronary artery disease. For example, even if significant stenosis (>50%) is identified at CTA, fewer than 50% of the lesions actually cause ischemia. Furthermore, as many as 20% of patients with severe stenoses (i.e., >70%) on CTA turn out not to have ischemia confirmed by ICA and FFR. As a result, these patients risk of being referred for ICA when they do not need it.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

50 patients who is suspected of Coronary Heart Disease and has undergone Computed tomography angiography (CTA) procedure will be recruited for the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 21-80 Years old
  • Scheduled to undergo clinically-indicated non-emergent invasive catheterization angiography (ICA)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals unable to provide informed consent
  • Non-cardiac illness with life expectancy <2years
  • Pregnant State
  • Allergy to iodinated contrast
  • Significant arrhythmia ; heart rate ≥100 beats/min ; systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg
  • Renal dysfunction (Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m2)
  • Contraindication to beta blockers or nitroglycerin
  • Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class IV angina

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
First occurrence of cardiovascular event
Time Frame: 1 Year
1 Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ru San Tan, MBBS, National Heart Centre Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe