Role of Ethnicity and Environment on Regulation of Response Towards Sensory Stimulation in Children

June 1, 2017 updated by: GOMEZ Ivan Neil Benitez, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Role of Ethnicity and Environment on Regulation of Response Towards Sensory Stimulation in Children: A Neurophysiological Study

Difference in autonomic nervous system processes across cultural and ethnic groups was suggested and autonomic regulation differentiation may occur even at an early age. However, the role of ethnicity and environment on regulation of response towards sensory stimulation in children is not well understood yet. This research aims to compare the autonomic activity at resting condition and toward a block of auditory stimulation between typically developing children from different countries and living environments. There will be two phases in this study. In Phase I, two groups of participants will be recruited: (a) 32 typically-developing Chinese children living in Hong Kong, (HK group) and (b) 32 typically developing Filipino children living in Hong Kong (Fil-HK group). In phase II, two groups of participants will be recruited: (a) 32 typically-developing Filipino children who are living at Urban area (PH-U group), and (b) 32 typically developing Filipino children who are living at Philippines-Rural area (PH-R group). Participants will be composed of males and females ages 7-12 years old, and without known history of developmental disabilities, medical history of cardiac or pulmonary problem, medical history of diabetes, or having any sensory deficits. Recruited participants will watch a silent movie, and listen to a block of sound. Autonomic activity (heart rate variability and electrodermal activity) will be measured and recorded using Polar H2 heart rate monitor and eSense skin response. Recordings will be screened for ectopic beats of HRV or bursts of EDA. The HRV and EDA signals will be processed by using aHRV and the eSense propriety software, respectively, and according to the standards of editing HRV and EDA artefacts. Autonomic activity (LF, HF and EDA) at resting condition, and hypothesis interaction between conditions (resting condition vs. auditory stimulation) and groups (HK group and PH-U group; Fil-HK group and PH-U group; PH-U group vs. PH-R group) will be tested with repeated measures of MANOVA. All significant levels will be set at p≤ 0.05. This study will increase the understanding on the role of culture and environment in the regulation of behaviour in auditory processing. The findings of this research may further shed light on the evaluation and treatment planning for children across and within cultures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: Difference in autonomic nervous system (ANS) processes across cultural and ethnic groups was suggested and autonomic regulation differentiation may occur even at an early age. However, the role of ethnicity and environment on regulation of response towards sensory stimulation in children is not well understood yet. This research aims to compare the autonomic activity at resting condition and toward a block of auditory stimulation between typically developing children from different countries and living environments and examine the role of environments and ethnicity on autonomic regulation.

Methods: Four groups of typically-developing participants will be recruited in this study: 1) Chinese children living in Hong Kong (n=32); Filipino children living in Hong Kong (32); Filipino children living in urban-Philippines (n=32); Filipino children living in urban-Philippines (n=32). Participants will be males (nm=16) and females (nf=16), ages 7-12 years old, and without known history of developmental disabilities, medical history of cardiac or pulmonary problem, medical history of diabetes, or having any sensory deficits. Recruited participants will watch a silent movie, and listen to a block of sound stimulus presentations. Autonomic activity (heart rate variability and electrodermal activity) will be measured and recorded using Polar H2 heart rate monitor and eSense GSR. Recordings will be screened for ectopic beats of HRV or bursts of EDA. The HRV and EDA signals will be processed by using aHRV and Ledalab software, respectively, and according to the standards of editing and analysing HRV and EDA artefacts. Autonomic activity (LF, HF and EDA) at experimental condition groups (HK group and PH-U group; Fil-HK group and PH-U group; PH-U group vs. PH-R group) will be tested with repeated measures of MANOVA. All significant levels will be set at a critical α=> .05.

Discussion: This study will increase the understanding on the role of culture and environment in the regulation of behaviour in auditory processing. The findings of this research may further shed light on the evaluation and treatment planning for children across and within cultures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kowloon, Hong Kong
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

For all participant groups, the recruited sample shall be males and females, aged 7-12 years old. Any participant with known history of developmental disabilities, medical history of cardiac or pulmonary problem, medical history of diabetes, or having any sensory deficits will be excluded. All participants will also be screened for past pertinent medical history for any maladaptive behaviour in sensory processing in daily living. Those showing definite problem in sensory processing will be excluded from the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male or female
  • 7-12 years old
  • enrolled in primary school
  • currently resides in the country/area in context
  • for Hong Kong participants: Hong Kong-Chinese national
  • for Philippine participants: born and living within the area in context

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known history of developmental disabilities, medical history of cardiac or pulmonary problem, medical history of diabetes, or having any sensory deficits
  • repeated a grade level
  • multiracial parental background

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
HK-Children
This is a group of typically-developing children ages 7-12 years old who are of Chinese ethnicity, born and raised in Hong Kong (n=32).

As mentioned by Goldberger and Veroff (1995) the concept of ethnicity is also associated with culture and is often used interchangeably with culture as well as with race. Ethnic differences are not necessarily inherited, but they are learned through constant exposure; however have strong genetic influences that explain consequent behavioural differences between different ethnic groups (Chudek & Henrich, 2011). An individual's genetic makeup greatly affects their behaviours (Klahr & Burt, 2014).

In this study, we look at exposure to different ethnicity as exemplified by comparison between two groups of typically-developing children from different ethnicity (Chinese children in Hong Kong and Filipino Children in Hong Kong).

FHK-Children
This is a group of typically-developing children ages 7-12 years old who are of Filipino ethnicity; either born, migrated and/or raised in Hong Kong (n=32).

As mentioned by Goldberger and Veroff (1995) the concept of ethnicity is also associated with culture and is often used interchangeably with culture as well as with race. Ethnic differences are not necessarily inherited, but they are learned through constant exposure; however have strong genetic influences that explain consequent behavioural differences between different ethnic groups (Chudek & Henrich, 2011). An individual's genetic makeup greatly affects their behaviours (Klahr & Burt, 2014).

In this study, we look at exposure to different ethnicity as exemplified by comparison between two groups of typically-developing children from different ethnicity (Chinese children in Hong Kong and Filipino Children in Hong Kong).

FU-Children
This is a group of typically-developing children ages 7-12 years old who are of Filipino ethnicity, born and raised in an urban area in the Philippines (n=32).
The living environment has been implicated to have an effect on a person's psychological functioning (Rutter, Picker, Murray & Eaves, 2001) and eventually how behaviour is manifested. The proposed disparity or effects between urban and rural dwelling is built on research that looks at the restorative and calming features of the natural environment, as well as the chaotic organization of the living spaces in urban settings.
FR-Children
This is a group of typically-developing children ages 7-12 years old who are of Filipino ethnicity, born and raised in a rural area in the Philippines (n=32).
The living environment has been implicated to have an effect on a person's psychological functioning (Rutter, Picker, Murray & Eaves, 2001) and eventually how behaviour is manifested. The proposed disparity or effects between urban and rural dwelling is built on research that looks at the restorative and calming features of the natural environment, as well as the chaotic organization of the living spaces in urban settings.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart Rate Variability
Time Frame: Day 1

Heart rate variability (HRV) has been considered as a promising marker for autonomic activity, specifically of parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) activity (Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology, 1996). Frequency domain analysis covers total power (0.0-0.5 Hz) in its raw and normalized units, low (LF; 0.04-0.15 Hz) and high (HF; 0.15-0.40 Hz) frequency components in its raw and normalized units. The normalized units of the LF will be used as representative of predominantly sympathetic modulation activity (SNS), while the normalized units of the HF will be used as representatives of parasympathetic modulation activity.

Since HRV can measure both SNS and PNS simultaneously, this study will use HRV as one of the measurements. Nevertheless, it has been argued if the value of LF is a pure measure of SNS (Goldstein et al., 2011). Therefore, other than HRV, EDA will also be a supplementary measurement.

Day 1
Electrodermal Activity
Time Frame: Day 1
Electrodermal activity (EDA) is a valid measure of autonomic nervous system activity frequently used to index behavioural processes (Boucsein, Fowles, Grimnes, Ben-Shakhar & Roth, 2012). EDA is composed of a tonic and phasic drivers that reflect autonomic availability and response patterns respectively. Tonic EDA will be represented by the CDA.Tonic, which has been recommended to be the most accurate representation of the deconvoluted underlying skin conductance level within the specified block expressed in µS (Benedek & Kaernbach, 2010). To represent the sympathetic activity in the form of phasic skin conductance response, the CDA.SCR will computed. The CDA.SCR is considered as the average phasic driver within the specified response window initially set, and represents the phasic EDA most accurately expressed in units of µS (Benedek & Kaernbach, 2010).
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensory Behaviours: English and Chinese versions of the Sensory Profile
Time Frame: Day 1
To measure the child's behavioural patterns in response to sensory stimulus in his daily activities, we will use the original Sensory Profile (Dunn, 1999) and Chinese Sensory Profile (Cheung & Siu, 2010). The original Sensory Profile which was developed and validated by Dunn (1999) is a 125 item questionnaire that is completed by the caregiver. The Chinese Sensory Profile was translated and validated by Cheung and Siu (2010) is a 100-item parent-report measure used among children and uses the same rating scale as with the original one. In this research, similar items from the original English version and Chinese versions of the Sensory Profile are identified and matched.
Day 1
Temperament: English and Chinese versions of the Temperament in Middle Child Questionnaire and Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1
Temperament will be measured using the Temperament in Middle Childhood Questionnaire (TMCQ; Simonds & Rothbart, 2004; 2006) for 7-10 year old children; and the Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire (TMCQ; Ellis & Rothbart, 2001) for children 11-12 years old. TMCQ is a 157-item parent questionnaire, while EATQ s 65-item form with a scale; both are parent-rated measures of reactive and regulative temperament traits among children using a 5-point Likert scale (a range of "Almost always untrue-1" to "Almost always true-5") for each item. The original version was developed using the English language. The Chinese translation of TMCQ (Lay et al., 2004) and EATQ (Lay & Hsu, 2004) will be used Chinese-speaking participants.
Day 1
Resilience: English and Chinese versions of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure
Time Frame: Day1
The Child and Youth Resilience Measure [37] (CYRM) was established through a process of interviews with youth and adults in countries around the world was completed by the participants' parents. This research uses the 28-item (> 10 yrs. old) or 26 item (5-9 yrs. old) Person-Most-Knowledgeable questionnaire version, which was developed and validated by Ungar and Liebenberg [38]. While the CYRM is originally in English, a translated Chinese version was recommended and provided by the authors and was used among Chinese participants in this research. Parents rate each item with three possible response: "Yes," "Sometimes" or "No."
Day1

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body-Mass Index
Time Frame: Day 1
Body mass index (BMI) was ascertained through measurement of the participants' height (cm) and weight (kg).
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Cynthia YY Lai, PhD, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSEARS20150316001-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe