Evaluation of Mirus™ for Sedation in Resuscitation (MIRUS)

August 17, 2018 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Current recommendations for the conduct of sédationanalgésie ICU encourage the use of the lightest possible sedation strategies, avoiding the administration of benzodiazepines source of longer durations of ventilation and ICU stay of syndrome cessation, mental confusion. Among the proposed alternatives, administration of halogenated volatile agents (sevoflurane) in resuscitation is interesting because their favorable pharmacokinetic even after prolonged administration: no tachyphylaxis, rapid clearance, no withdrawal syndrome.

There are two suitable delivery devices sevoflurane in intensive care, both with CE marking. The device Mirus ™ (Pall Medical, Fribourg, Switzerland) is the newest and it is easy to use and reliable. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of Mirus ™ device in trauma resuscitation and cardiovascular resuscitation.

Specifically, it will use this modality in case of failure with conventional sedation products (propofol, midazolam): maximum permissible doses, sedation weaning failure due to severe agitation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • University Hospital Grenoble

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patient requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged over 18 years
  • In mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours
  • No intracranial hypertension
  • In severe state of agitation measured by a sedation scale score greater than 2 RASS
  • Agitation observed in two circumstances: receiving maximal doses of propofol (≥ 5 mg / kg / h) and / or midazolam (≥ 0.2 mg / kg / h), or weaning failure to stop the sedation agitation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a severe head injury (Glasgow initial score between 3 and 8) requiring monitoring intracranial pressure and / or treatment of intracranial hypertension
  • Sedation with dexmedetomidine
  • Personal or family antecedent of anesthetic malignant hyperthermia
  • Pregnant woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
ead-time (in minutes) of sevoflurane sedation for obtaining a target RASS score between 1 (anxious) and 2 (mild sedation).
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-François PAYEN, MD, University Hospital, Grenoble

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 17, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 8, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 8, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 38RC15.111

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patient Requiring Mechanical Ventilation

Clinical Trials on patient requiring the MIRUS (mechanical ventilation)

3
Subscribe