- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06143384
Telemonitoring in Home Mechanical Ventilation
Benefits of Telemonitoring in Home Mechanical Ventilation by the Use of a Simple and Intuitive Algorithm
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES : Use of a decisional algorithm (developed by La Citadelle/Liège) to assess Telemonitoring (AirView type, ResMed) of data in the ventilators of patients using Home Mechanical Ventilation (HMV), and registered in the Belgian agreement for HMV at 1/ the Citadelle hospital in Liège and 2/HUB-Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
BACKGROUND: HMV initiated in the hospital is used at home. Patients who benefit from HMV present significant functional limitations of cardio-respiratory, neurological and/or physical origin. Such limitations compromise the ability of patients to travel to the referring hospital. As a result, good treatment follow-up is difficult to assess both from quantity and quality points of view. This is why Telemonitoring systems have been developed to access ventilator build-in-software data at through dedicated online systems. In other words, data from devices operating at home can be sent to the hospital and analyzed in real time by professionnals in the hospital. This project aims to evaluate the impact of Telemonitoring ventilator's data on the quality of HMV-monitoring in patients living and using HMV at home.
METHODS: A one-year multicentric, observational, longitudinal and prospective evaluation of build-in-software data telemonitoring of home ventilators in patients using HMV in Belgium. The two Belgian hospitals will each follow 10 patients for one year (2024). The data from the ventilator as well as the actions to be taken in response to Airview Telemonitoring alerts will be carried out using a decision-making algorithm created by the Citadelle Hospital in Liège.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Michel Toussaint, PhD
- Phone Number: +322555 67 54
- Email: michel.toussaint@hubruxelles.be
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Adrien Meunier, MSc
- Phone Number: +3243216494
- Email: adrien.meunier@citadelle.be
Study Locations
-
-
-
Brussels, Belgium, 1420
- Michel Toussaint
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients starting HMV in 2024, followed up in 1/ Liège or 2/ Brussels, and using devices from the ResMed company (Astral 150 ou Lumis 150).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals refusing to sign the consent form
- Presence of acute pathology requiring hospitalization and close monitoring of ventilation
- Patients using a tracheostomy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Patients using Home Mechanical Ventilation (HMV)
Patients using Home Mechanical Ventilation (HMV), and registered in the Belgian agreement for HMV at 1/ the Citadelle hospital in Liège, Belgium and 2/HUB-Erasme hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
|
Introduction of AirView telemonitoring of HMV, during a 6-months period.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Compliance to the treatment
Time Frame: T1: Mean value during night 1 (inpatient)
|
Hours of use of HMV/24h
|
T1: Mean value during night 1 (inpatient)
|
Compliance to the treatment
Time Frame: T2: Mean value during night 2 (inpatient)
|
Hours of use of HMV/24h
|
T2: Mean value during night 2 (inpatient)
|
Compliance to the treatment
Time Frame: T3: Mean value during nights 24-30 (outpatient)
|
Hours of use of HMV/24h
|
T3: Mean value during nights 24-30 (outpatient)
|
Compliance to the treatment
Time Frame: T4: Mean value during nights 174-180 (outpatient)
|
Hours of use of HMV/24h
|
T4: Mean value during nights 174-180 (outpatient)
|
Leaks
Time Frame: T1: Median value during night 1 (inpatient)
|
Unintentional leaks inform about undesirable leakage around the mask (bad sealing) or patients mouth leakage.
|
T1: Median value during night 1 (inpatient)
|
Leaks
Time Frame: T2: Median value during nights 2 (inpatient)
|
Unintentional leaks inform about undesirable leakage around the mask (bad sealing) or patients mouth leakage.
|
T2: Median value during nights 2 (inpatient)
|
Leaks
Time Frame: T3: Median value during nights 24-30 (outpatient)
|
Unintentional leaks inform about undesirable leakage around the mask (bad sealing) or patients mouth leakage.
|
T3: Median value during nights 24-30 (outpatient)
|
Leaks
Time Frame: T4: Median value during nights 174-180 (outpatient)
|
Unintentional leaks inform about undesirable leakage around the mask (bad sealing) or patients mouth leakage.
|
T4: Median value during nights 174-180 (outpatient)
|
AHI index
Time Frame: T1 : Median value during night 1 (inpatient)
|
The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) informs about obstructive and apneic events during HMV.
|
T1 : Median value during night 1 (inpatient)
|
AHI index
Time Frame: T2: Median value during night 2 (inpatient)
|
The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) informs about obstructive and apneic events during HMV.
|
T2: Median value during night 2 (inpatient)
|
AHI index
Time Frame: T3: Median value during nights 24-30 (outpatient)
|
The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) informs about obstructive and apneic events during HMV.
|
T3: Median value during nights 24-30 (outpatient)
|
AHI index
Time Frame: T4: Median value during nights 174-180 (outpatient)
|
The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) informs about obstructive and apneic events during HMV.
|
T4: Median value during nights 174-180 (outpatient)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Inconfort score
Time Frame: T1 : Score after night 1 (inpatient)
|
This score (0-4 points) evaluates the discomfort of the patient using HMV.
A score of zero suggests perfect comfort (none out of the 4 symptoms present) and a score of 4 (all symptoms present) suggests maximal discomfort related to the presence of the following 4 symptoms: pain or skin lesions, dryness of the mucous membranes, rhinitis or eye irritation, discomfort related to the settings of the device.
|
T1 : Score after night 1 (inpatient)
|
Inconfort score
Time Frame: T2 : Score after night 2 (inpatient)
|
This score (0-4 points) evaluates the discomfort of the patient using HMV.
A score of zero suggests perfect comfort (none out of the 4 symptoms present) and a score of 4 (all symptoms present) suggests maximal discomfort related to the presence of the following 4 symptoms: pain or skin lesions, dryness of the mucous membranes, rhinitis or eye irritation, discomfort related to the settings of the device.
|
T2 : Score after night 2 (inpatient)
|
Inconfort score
Time Frame: T3 : Score after nights 24-30 (outpatient)
|
This score (0-4 points) evaluates the discomfort of the patient using HMV.
A score of zero suggests perfect comfort (none out of the 4 symptoms present) and a score of 4 (all symptoms present) suggests maximal discomfort related to the presence of the following 4 symptoms: pain or skin lesions, dryness of the mucous membranes, rhinitis or eye irritation, discomfort related to the settings of the device.
|
T3 : Score after nights 24-30 (outpatient)
|
Inconfort score
Time Frame: T4 : Score after nights 174-180 (outpatient)
|
This score (0-4 points) evaluates the discomfort of the patient using HMV.
A score of zero suggests perfect comfort (none out of the 4 symptoms present) and a score of 4 (all symptoms present) suggests maximal discomfort related to the presence of the following 4 symptoms: pain or skin lesions, dryness of the mucous membranes, rhinitis or eye irritation, discomfort related to the settings of the device.
|
T4 : Score after nights 174-180 (outpatient)
|
Algorithm Score
Time Frame: T2 : Score after night 2 (inpatient)
|
This score (0-2 points) is given by the professional assessing the algorithm effectiveness after the Airview data analysis: 0 - no or useless intervention of the carer after using the algorithm, 1 - partial positive improvement after intervention post-algorithm, 2 - clear improvement after intervention post-algorithm or no use of the algorithm because of perfect use of HMV at home.
|
T2 : Score after night 2 (inpatient)
|
Algorithm Score
Time Frame: T3 : Score after nights 24-30 (outpatient)
|
This score (0-2 points) is given by the professional assessing the algorithm effectiveness after the Airview data analysis: 0 - no or useless intervention of the carer after using the algorithm, 1 - partial positive improvement after intervention post-algorithm, 2 - clear improvement after intervention post-algorithm or no use of the algorithm because of perfect use of HMV at home.
|
T3 : Score after nights 24-30 (outpatient)
|
Algorithm Score
Time Frame: T4 : Score after night 2 (outpatient)
|
This score (0-2 points) is given by the professional assessing the algorithm effectiveness after the Airview data analysis: 0 - no or useless intervention of the carer after using the algorithm, 1 - partial positive improvement after intervention post-algorithm, 2 - clear improvement after intervention post-algorithm or no use of the algorithm because of perfect use of HMV at home.
|
T4 : Score after night 2 (outpatient)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Geoffroy De Fooz, Dr, Citadelle Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Adrien Meunier, MSc, Citadelle Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Citadelle Liège project1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Respiratory Insufficiency Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
-
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityNot yet recruitingRespiratory Insufficiency Requiring Mechanical VentilationChina
-
University Hospital, GrenobleTerminatedPatient Requiring Mechanical VentilationFrance
-
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityRecruitingRespiratory Insufficiency Requiring Mechanical VentilationChina
-
Beijing Chao Yang HospitalRecruitingPatients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation and Invasive Mechanical VentilationChina
-
Emory UniversityEyefree Assisting Communication LtdCompletedAcute Respiratory Failure Requiring Mechanical VentilationUnited States
-
Rostrum Medical Innovations Inc.University of California, DavisRecruitingElective Procedures Requiring Mechanical VentilationUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierTerminatedChronic Respiratory Failure With Acute Decompensation Requiring Mechanical Ventilation for More Than 48 HoursFrance
-
French Society for Intensive CareUniversity Hospital, ToursCompletedICU Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical VentilationFrance
-
University Health Network, TorontoActive, not recruitingRespiratory Failure | Mechanical Ventilation Complication | Diaphragm Injury | Lung Transplant; Complications, MechanicalCanada
-
University of Lausanne HospitalsCompletedRespiratory Failure Requiring Non Invasive VentilationSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on Telemonitoring AirView (ResMed company)
-
ResMedWithdrawn