Videolaryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation

January 4, 2017 updated by: Maria Vargas, Federico II University

Comparison Between Imago V-Blade and Glidescope During Endotracheal Intubation: a Feasibility Study

The primary end point of this study is the feasibility of intubation. The secondary end-points are the success to intubate in the first attempt, the intubation time, the Cormack and Lehane score view, the comparison of the intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score and the need for maneuvers to aid the endotracheal intubation comparing Imago V-Blade ® and Glidescope®.

Patients admit to the operation rooms of University of Naples "Federico II" and requiring endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia will be consecutively screened for the presence of predicted difficult airway according Italian guideline. According to this guideline, the presence of one or more of the following parameters may be considered highly predictive of difficult intubation: Mallampati class 3-4, inter-incisor distance < 30 mm, mental-thyroidal distance < 60 mm, large prominence of superior incisors above inferior incisors uncorrectable with jaw-thrust, reduced head and neck motility, and reduced mental-jugular distance. Patients matching more then 1 of the previous criteria stated by Italian guideline will be included in this case controlled study. Patients 1) without criteria for predicted difficult airway; 2) those requiring emergency surgery; 3) aged < 18 years; or 4) declined consent to participate, will be excluded from this study.The primary end-point was the comparison of the intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score. The secondary end-points were the learning curve, the intubation time, the Cormack and Lehane score view, and the need for maneuvers to aid the endotracheal intubation comparing different videolaryngoscopes available in our department. Two anesthesiologists with 10 years of experience in conventional endotracheal intubation and trained for video assisted intubation will perform the maneuvers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Naples, Italy, 80100
        • University of Naples Federico II department of Anesthesia and Critical Care

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 77 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age>18 years
  • Mallampati class 3-4
  • inter-incisor distance < 30 mm
  • mental-thyroidal distance < 60 mm
  • large prominence of superior incisors above inferior incisors uncorrectable with jaw-thrust -reduced head and neck motility
  • reduced mental-jugular distance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 1 criteria for predicted difficult airway
  • emergency surgery
  • age < 18 years
  • declined consent to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: endotracheal intubation with Imago V-blade
Patients in this arm will receive endotracheal intubation with the Imago V-Blade videolaryngoscopes.
the endotracheal intubation will be performed with videolaryngoscopes (imago V-Blade) according to the user manual
Active Comparator: endotracheal intubation with Glidescope
Patients in this arm will receive endotracheal intubation with the glidescope videolaryngoscopes.
the endotracheal intubation will be performed with videolaryngoscopes (Glidescope) according to the user manual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
feasibility of endotracheal intubation
Time Frame: within 60 seconds
within 60 seconds

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate of endotracheal intubation using Imago V-Blade compared with Glidescope
Time Frame: wthin 120 seconds
Time to reach a successful endotracheal intubation from the beginning of indirect laryngoscopy to the confirmation of the intubation with the evaluation of the end-tidal carbon dioxide
wthin 120 seconds
Intubation time
Time Frame: wthin 120 seconds
time to reach endotracheal intubation from the beginning of indirect laryngoscopy to the confirmation of the intubation with the evaluation of the end-tidal carbon dioxide
wthin 120 seconds
Cormack and Lehane score view
Time Frame: During endotracheal intubation
During endotracheal intubation
use of adjunctive maneuvers to aid the endotracheal intubation
Time Frame: During endotracheal intubation
the investigators evaluated the necessary maneuvers to aid a successful endotracheal intubation as number of Readjusting patient's head, number of external laryngeal pressure, number of advancement or withdrawal the blade and number of increased lifting force
During endotracheal intubation
Intubation difficulty scale score
Time Frame: within 60 seconds
Time to pass the vocal cord during the successful endotracheal intubation measured from the beginning of indirect laryngoscopy to the confirmation of the intubation with the evaluation of the end-tidal carbon dioxide
within 60 seconds

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Airway1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Airway Management

Clinical Trials on Imago V-Balde

Subscribe