The Effect of Different Force Magnitudes on Maxillary Posterior Segment Intrusion

August 1, 2018 updated by: Heba El-Sayed Kamel Akl, Cairo University

The Effect of Two Different Force Magnitudes on Maxillary Posterior Segment Intrusion in Adult Patients With Skeletal Open Bite Using Temporary Anchorage Devices- A Randomized Clinical Trial

A Randomized clinical trial comparing two different force magnitudes in maxillary posterior segment intrusion in adult patients with skeletal open bite malocclusion

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled trial is aiming to study the effect of the different force magnitude on maxillary posterior segment intrusion. Two groups are going to be allocated and the amount and rate of intrusion will be measured and compared.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 25 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients with an age range from 17 to 25.
  • Skeletal open bite.
  • Dental open bite that is due to overgrowth of maxillary posterior segment as seen clinically and that can be corrected without surgical intervention (a minimum of 3 mm and a maximum of 8 mm).
  • Skeletal class I or mild to moderate skeletal class II that enables camouflage treatment.
  • Normal incisor show on smiling (that makes the case indicated for molar intrusion and not for incisor extrusion).
  • Full set of maxillary posterior dentition (first and second premolars, first molars at least).
  • No previous orthodontic treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medically compromised patients.
  • Patients suffering from any congenital or hereditary diseases.
  • Smoking or any systemic diseases.
  • Chronic use of any medications including antibiotics, phenytoin, cyclosporin, anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroids, and calcium channel blockers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intrusion by 200 g
Applying 200 g intrusive force for the maxillary posterior segment intrusion using miniscrews
using miniscrews and coil springs to apply the intrusive force on maxillary posterior segment intrusion.
Experimental: Intrusion by 400 g
Applying 400 g of Intrusive force for the maxillary posterior segment intrusion using miniscrews
using miniscrews and coil springs to apply the intrusive force on maxillary posterior segment intrusion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amount of intrusion
Time Frame: 6 months
The amount the upper posterior teeth have been intruded.
6 months
Rate of bite closure
Time Frame: 6 months
The rate by which the open bite closes as a result of posterior segment intrusion
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average rate of intrusion
Time Frame: 6 months
The amount of intrusion divided by the duration of intrusion
6 months
Root resorption
Time Frame: 6 months
The amount of root resorption as a result of the intrusive force
6 months
Tipping
Time Frame: 6 months
The amount of mesiodistal and buccolingual tipping of posterior teeth
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 121888

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Participants data will not be exposed except for research committee

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthodontics

Clinical Trials on Intrusion by 400 g

3
Subscribe