Quality of Recovery After Reversal With Neostigmine or Sugammadex.

May 11, 2020 updated by: Ramon Abola, Stony Brook University

Pulmonary Function, Muscle Strength, Time to Extubation and Quality of Recovery in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit After Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade With Neostigmine or Sugammadex.

This study will compare patient recovery measures after reversal of neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine or sugammadex after surgery. Measures include pulmonary function, muscle strength, time to extubation and quality of recovery in the post anesthesia care unit.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Sugammadex has been shown to have a faster onset and more reliable reversal of neuromuscular blockade when compared to neostigmine as measured by return of Train-of-four (TOF) ratio to >0.9. (Breuckmann, 2015) The investigator's hypothesis is that sugammadex will be associated with improved deep breathing as measured by incentive spirometry in the PACU. The investigators also hypothesize that patients reversed with sugammadex will have shorter times to extubation and better recovery profiles in the PACU as measured by strength, PACU discharge readiness and quality of recovery scores.

Residual neuromuscular blockade after surgery can result in airway compromise, pulmonary complications, and possible need for reintubation and can be a negative experience for patients. Reintubation after surgery is currently a quality measure in NSQIP (National Surgery Quality Improvement Program) A TOF ratio of <0.9 has been identified as a marker of residual neuromuscular blockade in the PACU. (Farhan 2013) Several clinical trials have shown that reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex results in a faster and more reliable return to TOF ratio of >0.9 when compared to neostigmine. However most of these studies primarily report on TOF ratios. There are scant data on clinical outcomes after reversal with neostigmine versus sugammadex. Incentive spirometry is a clinically meaningful measurement of postoperative pulmonary function, i.e the ability to breath deeply, which minimizes atelectasis and risk of postoperative pneumonia.

The investigators will compare recovery profiles of patients who have received sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade after surgery. The primary outcome will be incentive spirometry volumes after surgery as a measure of pulmonary function. The secondary measures include hand grip measured using a dynamometer, time to extubation, time to PACU discharge, time to sit independently, and quality of recovery 15 survey scores.

This will be a single-center, prospective, randomized, assessor blinded, controlled trial. Patients will be randomized to either receive sugammadex or neostigmine for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade. The anesthesiologist will be unblinded to the study drug however the assessor in the PACU will be blinded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant must be willing and able to provide written informed consent for the study
  • Participant must be greater than or equal to 18 years of age
  • Participant must be ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class I, II or III
  • Planned use of neuromuscular blocking drugs
  • Planned use of endotracheal intubation
  • Planned for extubation to occur in the OR

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Class IV
  • Age < 18 years old
  • Inability to give oral or written consent
  • Known or suspected neuromuscular disorder impairing neuromuscular function
  • True allergy to muscle relaxants
  • A (family) history of malignant hyperthermia
  • A contraindication for neostigmine or sugammadex administration
  • Serum creatinine level of greater than 2.0 mg/dL
  • Surgery where the patient's arm is not available for neuromuscular monitoring
  • A plan to extubate under deep anesthesia
  • Pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Neostigmine
Patients in this arm will receive neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Neostigmine is historically the medication that has been used for this purpose.
Neostigmine will be given for reversal of neuromuscular blockade.
Other Names:
  • Prostigmine
Active Comparator: Sugammadex
Patients in this arm will receive sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Sugammadex is a newer, FDA approved, medication for this purpose.
Sugammadex will be given for reversal of neuromuscular blockade.
Other Names:
  • Bridion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incentive Spirometry, Change From Baseline and Recovery Profile - 30 Minutes
Time Frame: 30 Minutes
Incentive spirometry measurements will be done at 30, 60 and 120 minutes after surgery. The change from baseline and recovery profile will be measured.
30 Minutes
Incentive Spirometry, Change From Baseline and Recovery Profile - 60 Minutes
Time Frame: 60 Minutes after reversal
Incentive spirometry measurements will be done at 30, 60 and 120 minutes after surgery. The change from baseline and recovery profile will be measured.
60 Minutes after reversal
Incentive Spirometry, Change From Baseline and Recovery Profile - 120 Minutes
Time Frame: 120 minutes after reversal
Incentive spirometry measurements will be done at 30, 60 and 120 minutes after surgery. The change from baseline and recovery profile will be measured.
120 minutes after reversal

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grip Strength, Change From Baseline and Recovery Profile 30 Min
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Grip strength will be measured with a hand dynamometer
30 minutes
Grip Strength, Change From Baseline and Recovery Profile 60 Min
Time Frame: 60 minutes after reversal
Grip strength will be measured with a hand dynamometer
60 minutes after reversal
Grip Strength, Change From Baseline and Recovery Profile 120 Min
Time Frame: 120 minutes after surgery
Grip strength will be measured with a hand dynamometer
120 minutes after surgery
Time to Extubation
Time Frame: Immediately after surgery, up to 30 minutes
Measured time between surgery end and time of extubation (removal of breathing tube)
Immediately after surgery, up to 30 minutes
Train of Four Ratio > 90% During PACU Admission
Time Frame: At PACU admission, approximately within one hour of reversal of neuromuscular blockade reversal.
Train of four ratio (TOFR) is the ration of the twitch height of the 4th twitch compared to the 1st twitch during train of four neuromuscular stimulation. This measurement was performed using a TOF Watch, which in an accelemyographer. Electric current is applied to the ulnar nevre and the twitches are measured in the thumb. Adequate reversal of neuromuscular blockade is defined as a TOFR >90%.
At PACU admission, approximately within one hour of reversal of neuromuscular blockade reversal.
Quality of Recovery 15 Survey
Time Frame: Postoperative day number one

15 question survey to assess patient's overall quality of recovery after anesthesia/surgery.

Quality of Recovery 15 Survey. Minimum: 0 Maximum: 150 Higher Scores mean a better outcome and better quality of recovery.

Part A: How have you been feeling in the last 24 hours? 0 = none of the time (poor), 10 = all of the time (excellent). Examples: able to breath easily, able to enjoy food, feeling rested. etc.

Part B: Have you had any of the following in the last 24 hours? 10 to 0, where 10 = none of the time (Excellent) and 0 = all of the time (poor). Examples: moderate pain, nausea or vomiting, feeling worried or anxious, etc.

Postoperative day number one
Time to Readiness for Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Discharge (Aldrete Score >9)
Time Frame: Within 4 hours from the end of surgery
Measured time between PACU admission and meeting PACU discharge readiness. PACU discharge was defined as when the patient had an Aldrete score of 9 or higher as determined by the PACU nurse. The Aldrete score is a measure of post anesthesia recovery. 0 is poor condition and 10 is excellent condition. There are 5 assessment items (able to move voluntary, breathing, consciousness, circulation (BP) and spO2) which are graded on a 0-2 point scale with 0 being poor and 2 being excellent.
Within 4 hours from the end of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ramon Abola, MD, Stony Brook Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Incomplete Reversal of Neuromuscular Block

Clinical Trials on Neostigmine

3
Subscribe