Structural and Functional Effects of High Intensity Training (HIT) Program in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain (LBP-HIT-RCT)

August 8, 2017 updated by: Annick Timmermans, Hasselt University

Structural and Functional Effects of High Intensity Training (HIT) Program in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Low back pain is a common disorder, occurring worldwide in both males and females in all age groups. The prevalence is higher in females and the incidence peaks between 30 and 65 years. It is currently the most frequent musculoskeletal cause of functional disability and it has a major socio-economic impact on today's society. Although a small percentage of persons with low back pain can be diagnosed with a specific underlying cause, almost 90% of persons with low back pain present with symptoms of nonspecific origin. A part of these symptoms are only of short duration, but 23% of all people will develop nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP).

Exercise therapy (ET) is currently an important component in the treatment of NSCLBP. Previous studies analysed the effects of various modes of exercise therapy, such as motor control therapy, core stability training and aerobic conditioning training. However, therapy outcomes can be low, and guidelines in favour of using a specific program are contradictory. It thus still remains unclear which therapy modality is best suited. Furthermore, no recommendations are available about optimal training intensities during rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP.

Since as well aerobic as muscular deconditioning are apparent in persons with chronic low back pain and improvements in overall physical fitness can affect therapy outcomes in this population, ET specifically focussing on physical fitness can be advocated for NSCLBP rehabilitation. High Intensity Training (HIT), has been promoted as an effective and efficient training method for improving physical fitness and health related parameters in healthy persons. Also, HIT resulted in successful reconditioning and improvement of functional and disease related outcomes in persons with other chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, heart failure, COPD and cardiometabolic diseases. Although some studies showed promising results for the effect of HIT on low back pain such as high intensity isolated, evidence is still scarce and study results are unclear because of methodological shortcomings.

The aim of this randomized clinical trial study is to evaluate the effects of a HIT program on disease related outcomes, physical fitness and muscle contractile characteristics compared to a conventional rehabilitation program in persons with NSCLBP.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

125

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. medically diagnosed with non-specific chronic low back pain,
  2. over 25 years old,
  3. Oswestry Disability Index: disability score >20%,
  4. able to understand Dutch (spoken and written),
  5. Physical Activities Scale For Individuals with Physical Disabilities <30. -

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. invasive surgery at the lumbar spine in the last 18 months (arthrodesis was excluded, microsurgery was allowed),
  2. radiculopathy (uni- or bilateral),
  3. co-morbidities: paresis and/or sensory disturbances by neurological causes, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, an increase of pain of 3 points with a result of > 8/10 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in the last 48 hours, pregnancy,
  4. ongoing compensation claims and/or (work)disability > 6 months,
  5. rehabilitation/exercise therapy program for LBP in the past 6 months. -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: the 'cardio' HIT group
Group 1 receives HIT exercise, aimed only at improving cardiovascular endurance (the 'cardio' HIT group).
The participants are randomly divided through use of sealed envelopes into four groups that all follow high intensity training (HIT) programs. Each training group follows of a 12 week program (2x/week, 2h). All training will be conducted under the guidance of expert therapists.
Experimental: the 'general' HIT group
Group 2 receives HIT exercise aimed at improving both cardiovascular and general muscle condition (the 'general' HIT group ).
The participants are randomly divided through use of sealed envelopes into four groups that all follow high intensity training (HIT) programs. Each training group follows of a 12 week program (2x/week, 2h). All training will be conducted under the guidance of expert therapists.
Experimental: the 'lumbar' HIT group
Group 3 receives HIT exercise, aimed at improving both cardiovascular condition and specific trunk muscle condition (the 'lumbar' HIT group).
The participants are randomly divided through use of sealed envelopes into four groups that all follow high intensity training (HIT) programs. Each training group follows of a 12 week program (2x/week, 2h). All training will be conducted under the guidance of expert therapists.
Experimental: the 'combined' HIT group
Group 4 receives HIT exercise which is a combination of previous programs (cardiovascular fitness, muscular fitness and general training specific trunk muscles) (the 'combined' HIT group). These trainings will take place in the REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center on the campus of Hasselt University in Diepenbeek.
The participants are randomly divided through use of sealed envelopes into four groups that all follow high intensity training (HIT) programs. Each training group follows of a 12 week program (2x/week, 2h). All training will be conducted under the guidance of expert therapists.
Active Comparator: control group
Group 5 receives MIT exercise consisting of a combination of previous programs (cardiovascular fitness, muscular fitness and general training specific trunk muscles) (the 'MIT' group)
MIT exercise consisting of a combination of previous programs (cardiovascular fitness, muscular fitness and general training specific trunk muscles) (the 'MIT' group).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain
Time Frame: day 1
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a nominal scale on which the participant indicates the amount of pain he/she perceives at that current moment. It consists of a line indicating eleven successive scores (0-10), whereby score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'worst pain imaginable'. An improvement of 2 levels or more is accepted as clinically relevant.
day 1
pain
Time Frame: week 6
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
week 6
pain
Time Frame: week 12
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
week 12
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: day 1
The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) is an ordinal 17 item questionnaire that inventories pain-related fear of movement for persons with subacute and chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia. A higher score relates to more pain-related fear.
day 1
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: week 6
The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) is an ordinal 17 item questionnaire that inventories pain-related fear of movement for persons with subacute and chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia. A higher score relates to more pain-related fear.
week 6
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: week 12
The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) is an ordinal 17 item questionnaire that inventories pain-related fear of movement for persons with subacute and chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia. A higher score relates to more pain-related fear.
week 12
Physical disability RMDQ
Time Frame: day 1
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is an ordinal 24 item questionnaire for evaluating the disability level of the patient with low back pain with regards to activities of daily living. A higher score correlates to a higher level of disability and a change of 5 is the minimal clinically important difference.
day 1
Physical disability RMDQ
Time Frame: week 6
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is an ordinal 24 item questionnaire for evaluating the disability level of the patient with low back pain with regards to activities of daily living. A higher score correlates to a higher level of disability and a change of 5 is the minimal clinically important difference.
week 6
Physical disability RMDQ
Time Frame: week 12
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is an ordinal 24 item questionnaire for evaluating the disability level of the patient with low back pain with regards to activities of daily living. A higher score correlates to a higher level of disability and a change of 5 is the minimal clinically important difference.
week 12
Endurance capacity
Time Frame: day 1
Endurance capacity is tested to volitional fatigue on an electronically braked bike ergometer
day 1
Endurance capacity
Time Frame: week 6
Endurance capacity is tested to volitional fatigue on an electronically braked bike ergometer
week 6
Endurance capacity
Time Frame: week 12
Endurance capacity is tested to volitional fatigue on an electronically braked bike ergometer
week 12
Abdominal/back strength
Time Frame: day 1
The maximum voluntary isometric and dynamic strength of back and abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
day 1
Abdominal/back strength
Time Frame: week 6
The maximum voluntary isometric and dynamic strength of back and abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
week 6
Abdominal/back strength
Time Frame: week 12
The maximum voluntary isometric and dynamic strength of back and abdominal muscles is measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (System 3, Biodex, Enraf-Nonius, New York).
week 12
Muscle Biopsy
Time Frame: day 1

muscle biopsies of the paravertebral muscles of the spine are obtained through a micro biopsy procedure (Biopsy gun, Bard Medical). This is done by a trained physician with extensive experience in taking muscle biopsies. The obtained muscle samples are divided into cryovials, per subject and per measurement (for the determination of muscle fiber CSA, muscle fiber characterization, distribution, angiogenesis, muscle fiber characteristics, etc.).

Safety Issue: Yes, taking a piece of muscle tissue, can be slightly painful, but there are no serious risks involved. There will be no permanent damage to the muscle. The risk of infection in the wound can never be excluded. However, the site of the biopsy is thoroughly decontaminated and sealed in order to achieve a good wound healing and prevent an infection. A local bleeding may occur in the muscle causing a bruise.

day 1
Muscle Biopsy
Time Frame: week 12

muscle biopsies of the paravertebral muscles of the spine are obtained through a micro biopsy procedure (Biopsy gun, Bard Medical). This is done by a trained physician with extensive experience in taking muscle biopsies. The obtained muscle samples are divided into cryovials, per subject and per measurement (for the determination of muscle fiber CSA, muscle fiber characterization, distribution, angiogenesis, muscle fiber characteristics, etc.).

Safety Issue: Yes, taking a piece of muscle tissue, can be slightly painful, but there are no serious risks involved. There will be no permanent damage to the muscle. The risk of infection in the wound can never be excluded. However, the site of the biopsy is thoroughly decontaminated and sealed in order to achieve a good wound healing and prevent an infection. A local bleeding may occur in the muscle causing a bruise.

week 12
Physical disability ODI
Time Frame: day 1
The Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a valid and reliable questionnaire for evaluating constraints experienced by people in their daily activities due to chronic low back pain. It consists of 10 items that are scored on a 5-point scale. The total score gives a percentage degree of limitation for the patient.
day 1
Physical disability ODI
Time Frame: week 6
The Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a valid and reliable questionnaire for evaluating constraints experienced by people in their daily activities due to chronic low back pain. It consists of 10 items that are scored on a 5-point scale. The total score gives a percentage degree of limitation for the patient.
week 6
Physical disability ODI
Time Frame: week 12
The Modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a valid and reliable questionnaire for evaluating constraints experienced by people in their daily activities due to chronic low back pain. It consists of 10 items that are scored on a 5-point scale. The total score gives a percentage degree of limitation for the patient.
week 12
activity level
Time Frame: day 1
Physical Activities Scale For Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) The PASIPD is a questionnaire consisting of 13 items to measure the physical activity of people with disabilities. It provides information about leisure, household and work-related physical activity in the last 7 days.
day 1
activity level
Time Frame: week 6
Physical Activities Scale For Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) The PASIPD is a questionnaire consisting of 13 items to measure the physical activity of people with disabilities. It provides information about leisure, household and work-related physical activity in the last 7 days.
week 6
activity level
Time Frame: week 12
Physical Activities Scale For Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) The PASIPD is a questionnaire consisting of 13 items to measure the physical activity of people with disabilities. It provides information about leisure, household and work-related physical activity in the last 7 days.
week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body composition
Time Frame: day 1
The body composition is obtained by means of a dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan.
day 1
Body composition
Time Frame: week 6
The body composition is obtained by means of a dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan.
week 6
Body composition
Time Frame: week 12
The body composition is obtained by means of a dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan.
week 12
physical activity tracking
Time Frame: day 1
Activity of the daily routine will be evaluated by means of wearing an accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X activity monitors) (2 midweek days and 1 weekend day, 3 consecutive days) throughout the day. A schedule will be inventoried by the participant (diary).
day 1
physical activity tracking
Time Frame: week 12
Activity of the daily routine will be evaluated by means of wearing an accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X activity monitors) (2 midweek days and 1 weekend day, 3 consecutive days) throughout the day. A schedule will be inventoried by the participant (diary).
week 12
disability in participation and quality of life
Time Frame: day 1
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) The SF-36 is a 36 item scale that assesses eight health concepts (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health) with the possibility of independent scoring for each.
day 1
disability in participation and quality of life
Time Frame: week 6
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) The SF-36 is a 36 item scale that assesses eight health concepts (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health) with the possibility of independent scoring for each.
week 6
disability in participation and quality of life
Time Frame: week 12
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) The SF-36 is a 36 item scale that assesses eight health concepts (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health) with the possibility of independent scoring for each.
week 12
Motivation VAS
Time Frame: day 1
The start motivation is measured by a visual analog scale (VAS).
day 1
Motivation IMI
Time Frame: day 1
At the end of the study setting viewing detailed motivation for the program based on the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) (on T1).
day 1
Motivation VAS
Time Frame: week 6
The start motivation is measured by a visual analog scale (VAS).
week 6
Motivation IMI
Time Frame: week 6
At the end of the study setting viewing detailed motivation for the program based on the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) (on T1).
week 6
Motivation VAS
Time Frame: week 12
The start motivation is measured by a visual analog scale (VAS).
week 12
Motivation IMI
Time Frame: week 12
At the end of the study setting viewing detailed motivation for the program based on the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) (on T1).
week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frank Vandenabeele, prof. dr., Hasselt University
  • Principal Investigator: Annick Timmermans, prof. dr., Hasselt University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LBP-HIT-RCT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on high intensity training (HIT) program

3
Subscribe