Therapy of Adults Affected by Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura With Dexamethasone

September 15, 2017 updated by: Saeid Rezaei Jouzdani, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Therapy of Adults Affected by Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura With 3 Cycles Pulses of High-dose Dexamethasone (HD-DXM)

In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial investigators' aim was to compare the efficacy and the adverse effect of 3 therapy cycles of HD-DXM versus conventional treatment with PDN for untreated adult patients with ITP. In this study standardized criteria and definitions were used according to consensus international working group guideline for ITPto compare clinical outcomes of the two corticosteroid treatment regimens and determine the superior regimen as a first line strategy for new primary ITP in adults

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Therapy of Adults affected by idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura with 3 cycles pulses of high-dose dexamethasone (HD-DXM): a prospective randomized clinical trial Alireza Sadeghi, Saeid Rezaei Jouzdani, Forough Hosseini

Introduction :

Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura(ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by platelet destruction leading to decreased platelet count and an increased risk of bleeding. Mechanisms including autoantibody- mediated platelet destruction, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte platelet lysis, impaired platelet maturation and production has been identified in the pathogenesis of ITP.(1)The first line treatment of ITP is still corticosteroid therapy. Prednisone(PDN) is the standard corticosteroid therapy in ITP practical guideline usually given at 1 mg/kg per day for 4 weeks and then tapered.(2) Recent studies suggested pulsed high-dose dexamethasone given at a dose 40 mg/day to a 4-day course treatment as an alternative corticosteroid instead of prednisone to reduce the duration and the adverse effect of corticosteroid therapy.(3-5) A multicenter randomized clinical trial compared the 2 corticosteroid therapy and suggested that HD-DXM has more effective and better tolerance than PDN.(4) Another multicenter cohort study using repeated courses of HD-DXM (from 6 to 4 cycles, repeated each cycle 28 days to 14 days interval) confirmed the benefit as compared with conventional therapy and proposed as a first-line treatment for patients with ITP. Also there was no difference in overall response rate between the third and the fourth cycles of HD-DXM pulses therapy, using 3 therapy cycles with 14 days interval between each cycle, has been proposed for better safety and efficacy.(5) In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial investigators' aim was to compare the efficacy and the adverse effect of 3 therapy cycles of HD-DXM versus conventional treatment with PDN for untreated adult patients with ITP. In this study standardized criteria and definitions were used according to consensus international working group guideline for ITP(6) to compare clinical outcomes of the two corticosteroid treatment regimens and determine the superior regimen as a first line strategy for new primary ITP in adults.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The eligible patients for this study were aged 18 or older of both genders with newly diagnosed primary ITP according to the international working group (IWG) guideline(6). All patients included in the study were treatment naïve ITP within 3 months from diagnosis and a platelet count of no more the 30×10^9/L, or more than 30×10^9/L with presence of bleeding symptoms according to the grading score of bleeding

Exclusion Criteria:

  • malignancy, pregnancy or lactation, liver and kidney failure, connective tissue disorders, seropositive detection of HIV, hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus or any recent viral infection, active infection, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disorders, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, psychosis, osteoporosis, any corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy in 3 months before diagnosis and any previous ITP-specific therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Prednisone receiving group
Patients in PDN arm received PDN
Drug: Prednisone
Patients in PDN arm received PDN orally at 1.0 mg/kg body weight daily for 4 consecutive weeks. After achieving responses the medication tapered gradually to less than 15mg daily or terminated over 4-6 weeks aimed at maintaining platelet count over 30 ×109/L.
Active Comparator: Dxamethasone receiving group
In HD-DXM arm, DXM was administered
Drug: High dose Dexamethasone pulses
In HD-DXM arm, DXM was administered intravenously at 40 mg in 500cc normal saline (0.9% saline) during 1 hour for consecutive 4 days and then stopped. This cycle was repeated in 14 days interval to receive 3 cycles of treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
platelet count
Time Frame: 6-12 months
6-12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Collaborators

Adibvira

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IUMS (Isfahan University of Medical Sciences)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ITP

Clinical Trials on Prednisone

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Mexico

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe