Comparison of the Ganglionated Plexi Activity in Patients With Different Forms of Atrial Fibrillation Guided by SUMO Technology

The purpose of this study is to compare DUA (discrete uptake accumulations) of mIBG activity in patients with different forms of atrial fibrillation and within a sub-group of healthy subjects.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630055
        • Recruiting
        • State Research Institute of CIrculation Pathology Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female patients, age ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years.
  2. Male or female, age ≥ 50 years in the healthy volunteers group
  3. No heart pathology (for volunteers)
  4. PAF, Pers AF and L-s Pers AF (ECG documented).
  5. LVEF ≥ 50%
  6. Able to provide written informed consent
  7. Able to comply with the requirements of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous AF ablation therapy
  2. Clinical evidence of active coronary ischemia, significant valvular heart disease, or hemodynamically significant congenital cardiac abnormality
  3. Recent (3 months) myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or transient ischemic attack (except if the patient had a DES implanted stent post-MI it would be one year)
  4. Contra-indication to Iodine-123 Meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I-mIBG), iodine, isoproterenol
  5. Use of medication for non-cardiac medical conditions that is known to interfere with 123I-mIBG uptake and cannot be safely withheld for at least 24 hours prior to the D-SPECT study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Volunteers
Healthy volunteers
  • Cardiac CT - contract enhanced cardiac CT according to standard protocol
  • D-SPECT SUMO study - standard SUMO protocol (suggested reduction in mIBG dose and increase in scan time to minimize overall radiation burden)
  • Merge CT and D-SPECT image data to generate SUMO map.
Active Comparator: PAF
Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
  • Cardiac CT - contract enhanced cardiac CT according to standard protocol
  • D-SPECT SUMO study - standard SUMO protocol (suggested reduction in mIBG dose and increase in scan time to minimize overall radiation burden)
  • Merge CT and D-SPECT image data to generate SUMO map.
  1. CARTO-reconstruction LA, preferably during same rhythm as SUMO map (generally sinus rhythm) for use during registration of SUMO map in CARTO.
  2. High frequency stimulation (HFS; 20-Hz frequency, 5-ms pulse duration, and 15-mA output) to access positive vagal response (the heart rate decreasing by 50% at baseline).
  3. RF ablation only at points where there is an HFS positive response to SUMO DUA (in sinus rhythm if AF converts)
  4. Target a region of 1.0 - 1.5 cm diameter around the SUMO mIBG DUA
  5. Control HFS
  6. At operator discretion, conventional PVI by circumferential antral ablation according to standard procedures.
  7. Exit and entrance block confirmation
  8. Attempt to induce sustained atrial tachycardia; optional mapping and ablation of post-ablation atrial tachycardia.
Active Comparator: Pers AF
Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Cardiac CT - contract enhanced cardiac CT according to standard protocol
  • D-SPECT SUMO study - standard SUMO protocol (suggested reduction in mIBG dose and increase in scan time to minimize overall radiation burden)
  • Merge CT and D-SPECT image data to generate SUMO map.
  1. CARTO-reconstruction LA, preferably during same rhythm as SUMO map (generally sinus rhythm) for use during registration of SUMO map in CARTO.
  2. High frequency stimulation (HFS; 20-Hz frequency, 5-ms pulse duration, and 15-mA output) to access positive vagal response (the heart rate decreasing by 50% at baseline).
  3. RF ablation only at points where there is an HFS positive response to SUMO DUA (in sinus rhythm if AF converts)
  4. Target a region of 1.0 - 1.5 cm diameter around the SUMO mIBG DUA
  5. Control HFS
  6. At operator discretion, conventional PVI by circumferential antral ablation according to standard procedures.
  7. Exit and entrance block confirmation
  8. Attempt to induce sustained atrial tachycardia; optional mapping and ablation of post-ablation atrial tachycardia.
Active Comparator: L-s Pers AF
Patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Cardiac CT - contract enhanced cardiac CT according to standard protocol
  • D-SPECT SUMO study - standard SUMO protocol (suggested reduction in mIBG dose and increase in scan time to minimize overall radiation burden)
  • Merge CT and D-SPECT image data to generate SUMO map.
  1. CARTO-reconstruction LA, preferably during same rhythm as SUMO map (generally sinus rhythm) for use during registration of SUMO map in CARTO.
  2. High frequency stimulation (HFS; 20-Hz frequency, 5-ms pulse duration, and 15-mA output) to access positive vagal response (the heart rate decreasing by 50% at baseline).
  3. RF ablation only at points where there is an HFS positive response to SUMO DUA (in sinus rhythm if AF converts)
  4. Target a region of 1.0 - 1.5 cm diameter around the SUMO mIBG DUA
  5. Control HFS
  6. At operator discretion, conventional PVI by circumferential antral ablation according to standard procedures.
  7. Exit and entrance block confirmation
  8. Attempt to induce sustained atrial tachycardia; optional mapping and ablation of post-ablation atrial tachycardia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
location of discrete uptake accumulations
Time Frame: 1 week
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
adverse events
Time Frame: 1 week
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 26, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Volunteers+AF patients

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Cardiac CT

Subscribe