Alternative Stimulation Mode and Location for Auditory Hallucination Neuromodulation Treatment

July 24, 2025 updated by: Xiaoming Du, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of the study is to test the hypothesis that functionally navigated repetitive TMS stimulations to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) modulate aberrant cortical electrical activities at PFC circuitry. The TMS location of the PFC site will be individually localized by the symptom-related functional connectivity between PFC and symptom related areas (such as the auditory and language processing cortex). The investigators predict that such modulation will correct abnormal activities in patients with schizophrenia, reduce symptoms, especially auditory hallucination, and improve working memory/sustained attention performance.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Neuroimaging studies suggest that aberrant activities at specific brain regions such as sensory areas and language-related areas are related to psychosis symptoms including auditory and visual hallucination, delusion, and thought disorders. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provides a non-invasive means for altering brain electrical neural activity. TMS has been approved by FDA for treatment of depression. Other applications have not been approved but it has been used in a wide range of clinical research especially in neurology and psychiatry. Among psychotic symptoms, there are preliminary significant improvement in treatments of auditory hallucination using TMS with small samples, but those treatments are not robust in larger samples. The high inter-subject variability limits the efficacy of TMS treatment in schizophrenia patients. The investigators aim to develop a TMS treatment method with a fMRI-defined treatment target area, where the TMS target is individually identified to maximize the TMS effects. The identification method uses both the anatomical character and its functional relationship with auditory hallucination and other psychosis symptoms. If the current target-identification successfully identified effective TMS target individually, the treatment efficacy will be significant improved and more patients will benefit from TMS treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 62 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female ages between ages 18-50 years
  • Ability to give written informed consent (age 18 or above)
  • Diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder and Evaluation to Sign Consent (ESC) above 10.
  • Is currently under the care of a licensed primary care provider or mental healthcare provider (e.g., psychiatrist, psychologist, nurse practitioner, licensed clinical social worker).
  • Have auditory hallucinations despite treated by two or more antipsychotics including one atypical antipsychotic medication.
  • Agrees to: (a) provide written permission, as requested, to allow any and all forms of communication between the investigators and study staff and any health care provider who currently provides and/or has provided service to the subject within two years of study enrollment; and (b) provide the names and verifiable contact information (name, email and mailing address, mobile and land-line phone number, as applicable) of at least two reliable persons ≥ age 22, who reside within a 30-minute drive of the subject's residence, and whom the research staff is at liberty to contact, as deemed necessary, for the duration of study participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons with a first-degree relative with inherited epilepsy, seizure disorder, or seizures or persons who answer "yes" to any of the parts (A. - G.) of Question 3 of an epilepsy screening questionnaire.
  • Taking > 400 mg clozapine/day and not on anti-seizure medication(s) with sufficient dose.
  • Failed TMS screening questionnaire.
  • Significant alcohol or other drug use (substance abuse within 1 month or substance dependence history within 6 months and having substance usage within 1 month) other than nicotine or marijuana dependence
  • Any major medical illnesses that may affect normal brain functioning. Examples of these conditions include, but not limited to, stroke, CNS infection or tumor, other significant brain neurological conditions.
  • Cardiac pacemakers, implanted medication pumps, intracardiac lines, or acute, unstable cardiac disease, with intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head, excluding the mouth, that cannot be safely removed.
  • History of head injury with loss of consciousness over 10 minutes; history of brain surgery
  • Cannot refrain from using alcohol and/or marijuana 24 hours or more prior to experiments.
  • Woman who is pregnant (child-bearing potential but not on contraceptive and missing menstrual period; or by self-report; or by positive pregnancy test) or has had unprotected sexual intercourse without birth control in the last 4 weeks.
  • Moderate-High Risk of suicide according to the Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Screen Version - Recent (i.e. answers YES to Question 3 and NO to Question 6 (Moderate risk); or answers YES to Questions 4, 5, or 6 (High risk) or in the clinical judgement of the investigator or the study psychiatrist.
  • In the medical opinion of the investigator, subjects with the following circumstances or conditions which can increase the risk of seizures may be excluded: sleep deprivation; major depressive disorder comorbid with dementia, underweight status; concurrent use of cephalosporins and antiarrhythmics (particularly propranolol); metabolic abnormalities (hyponatremia, hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, renal failure/uremia, liver failure); raised blood concentrations of proconvulsant medications due to reduced clearance (e.g. secondary to initiation of antibiotics for treatment of infections); alcohol withdrawal; use of stimulants, such as cocaine or MDMA; use of immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine, tacrolimus and other agents that can cause the posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome; dialysis; systemic infection, and fever itself.
  • History (or family history) of deep vein thrombosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active rTMS stimulation
Participants will receive two rTMS sessions in each treatment visit for up to 22 visits within about 6 weeks. There is a 30-minute rest between the two rTMS sessions.
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS stimulation
Participants will receive two sham rTMS sessions in each treatment visit for up to 22 visits within about 6 weeks. There is a 30-minute rest between the two sham rTMS sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brain connectivity as indicated by resting state functional connectivity value as assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is used to evaluate the brain activities that are corresponding to the treatment effect on auditory hallucination.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Electrophysiological responses as indicated by mismatch negativity amplitudes from electroencephalography recording (EEG)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Electroencephalogram (EEG) is used to evaluate the brain electrical activities that are corresponding to the treatment effect on auditory hallucination.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Electrophysiological responses as indicated by steady-state auditory evoked potentials from electroencephalography recording (EEG)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Electroencephalogram (EEG) is used to evaluate the brain electrical activities that are corresponding to the treatment effect on auditory hallucination.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Auditory hallucinations as assessed by Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Total score ranges from 0 to 44, with a lower score indicating a better outcome.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Negative symptoms as assessed by Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Total score ranges from 0 to 90, with a lower score indicating a better outcome.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Cognitive insight as assessed by the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Total score ranges from 15 to 60, with a lower score indicating a better outcome.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Depression as assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory measures the severity of depression
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Total score ranges from 0 to 63, with a lower score indicating a better outcome.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Depression as assessed by the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Total score ranges from 0 to 27, with a lower score indicating a better outcome.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Perception as assessed by the Perception State and Trait Scales (State score)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
The Perception State and Trait Scale measures subtle auditory and visual anomalies. State total score ranges from 0 to 48, with a lower score indicating a better outcome.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Perception as assessed by the Perception State and Trait Scales (Trait score)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
The Perception State and Trait Scale measures subtle auditory and visual anomalies. Trait total score ranges from 0 to 48, with a lower score indicating a better outcome.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Delusion as assessed by the Peters Delusions Inventory (yes/no score)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
The Peters Delusions Inventory measures subtle delusional tendencies. Yes/No total score ranges from 0 to 21, with a lower score indicating a better outcome.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Delusion as assessed by the Peters Delusions Inventory (distress score)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
The Peters Delusions Inventory measures subtle delusional tendencies. Distress total score ranges from 0 to 105, with a lower score indicating a better outcome.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Delusion as assessed by the Peters Delusions Inventory (pre-occupation score)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
The Peters Delusions Inventory measures subtle delusional tendencies. Pre-occupation total score ranges from 0 to 105, with a lower score indicating a better outcome.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
Delusion as assessed by the Peters Delusions Inventory (conviction score)
Time Frame: baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)
The Peters Delusions Inventory measures subtle delusional tendencies. Conviction total score ranges from 0 to 105, with a lower score indicating a better outcome.
baseline, intermittent (before or at the beginning of treatment visit 11, about 2 weeks after baseline), end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20, about 4 weeks after baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiaoming Du, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

September 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia and Related Disorders

Clinical Trials on Active rTMS stimulation

Subscribe