GAIN Symptoms: Post-traumatic Headache

April 17, 2024 updated by: Charlotte Nygaard, University of Aarhus

Post-traumatic Headache: Phenotyping and Exploring Pathophysiological Insights and Novel Treatment Strategies

The overall aim of the study is to advance the knowledge on the characterization and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of persistent post-traumatic headache (PTH) with a direct impact on the ability to diagnose and manage PTH effectively. The investigators also aim to evaluate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a novel intervention on PTH.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Post-traumatic headache (PTH) is one of the most common and persistent symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), with an estimation of 18-22% developing persistent (> 3 months) PTH. PTH is highly disabling. Unfortunately, its typical characteristics and pathophysiology are poorly understood leading to its complicated and diverse management.

There is no agreement on the clinical presentation of PTH.This is largely due to the scarcity of longitudinal prospective data on large cohorts of PTH. Describing headache phenotypes longitudinally might improve disease characterization, facilitate better classification and provide evidence based-criteria of diagnosing PTH. Furthermore, exploring biomarkers associated with mTBI may provide new knowledge on the poorly understood pathophysiology of post commotional symptoms (PCS) and PTH. Additionally, there are indications of somatosensory disturbances and impaired endogenous analgesic systems in PTH patients. Assessment of somatosensory signs and symptoms in relation to pain complaints and functioning of endogenous analgesic system may also aid in better understanding of pain mechanisms in these patients. Functioning of endogenous analgesic system can be assessed using conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigms. Further, a curious observation in concussion patients with face and/or head pain is that they perceive painful/affected area (head and/or face region) as "swollen" or "different" without any clinical signs or obvious physical differences. Hence, such "illusions" represent body image distortions or perceptual distortion (PD) of the head or face region, and may contribute to the chronification of pain. PD can significantly affect psychosocial well-being of patients as the face/head region is a key feature of one´s identity. Unfortunately, such a distressing phenomenon has not been investigated before in these patients. Currently, no strong evidence-based treatment guidelines for PTH exist. Neuromodulation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting involved brain regions and functional networks has recently been employed to treat several chronic pain conditions including migraine. Thus, rTMS could offer an optimal new treatment strategy for PTH, as there is an evidence of brain network dysfunction in these patients.

The overall aim is to advance the knowledge on the characterization and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of persistent PTH. The aim is also to measure the prevalence of perceived size changes (PD) of head and/or face region in patients with mild traumatic brain injury and its association with pain/PTH and other post commotional symptoms (PCS). The investigators will also evaluate the efficacy of rTMS on PTH. Deep phenotyping of PTH will be performed. Blood samples from mTBI patients will be examined for the biomarkers of PCS and PTH and the association between the biomarkers and the symptom levels of PCS, in particular PTH frequency and intensity will be evaluated. Additionally, the association between somatosensory function including CPM and the PTH frequency and intensity will be examined. Further, the effect of rTMS on headache severity and frequency (primary outcome) and somatosensory function, PD and other PCS (secondary outcome) after 1 and 3 months of stimulation will be evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Charlotte Nygaard, PhD student
  • Phone Number: 004542428145
  • Email: chnyga@rm.dk

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Simple Futarmal Kothari, Post.Doc.
  • Email: SIMKOT@rm.dk

Study Locations

      • Hammel, Denmark, 8450
        • Recruiting
        • Reseach Unit Hammel Neurocenter
        • Contact:
          • Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen, Professor
          • Phone Number: +45 7841 9043
          • Email: joerniel@rm.dk

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. mTBI within the last 2 to 4 months according to the diagnostic criteria recommended by the WHO task force
  2. age ≥ 18 years at the time of mTBI
  3. Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) score ≥ 3 (moderate or severe problem) for subitem headache and a diagnosis of persistent PTH attributed to mTBI according to ICHD-3.

Additionally, for study 2 and 3, subjects have to be stable on preventative headache medication. However, subjects are permitted to take ''as needed'' (PRN) medications throughout the study with documentation in a daily headache diary.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. objective neurological findings and/or acute trauma CT scan indicating neurological disease or brain damage
  2. previous mTBI within the last 2 years years leading to PCS lasting ≥ 3 months. Additionally, for study 2 and 3,
  3. Pre-trauma headache frequency ≥ 10 days in average per month the last 3 months prior to mTBI.
  4. past history of TMS therapy or TMS-related contraindications (pacemaker, epilepsy etc.).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham group
participants (n=31) will receive sham rTMS.
Five sessions of sham rTMS therapy will be distributed over 2 weeks
Active Comparator: Active rTMS treatment
Participants (n=31) will receive active rTMS treatment.
Five sessions of active rTMS therapy will be distributed over 2 weeks (20 Hz, 2000 pulses, 90% resting motor threshold) will be delivered to left dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex (DLPFC) around 6 months post-trauma.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the concentration of biomarkers
Time Frame: prior to rTMS intervention, immediately after rTMS intervention and 1 month after end of treatment
Changes in the blood biomarkers (such as neurofilament light chain, calcitonin gene related peptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, cytokines, mRNA, microRNA and circular RNA) and somatosensory function from baseline to immediately after the completion of intervention (rTMS) and 1 month post-rTMS.
prior to rTMS intervention, immediately after rTMS intervention and 1 month after end of treatment
Change in the number of headache days of moderate to severe intensity
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 1 month after end of treatment.
Change in the number of headache days of moderate to severe intensity from baseline to 1-month post intervention based on a self-reported daily headache diary, a self-reported headache questionaire and Headache Impact test (HIT-6).
Prior to intervention compared to 1 month after end of treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the number of headache days of moderate to severe intensity
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 3 months after end of treatment.
Change in the number of headache days of moderate to severe intensity from baseline to 1-month post intervention based on a self-reported daily headache diary, a self-reported headache questionaire and Headache Impact test (HIT-6).
Prior to intervention compared to 3 months after end of treatment.
Change in severity of post-concussion symptoms covering physical, cognitive, and emotional symptoms.
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Will be measured using the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) [range 0-64 (worst)].
Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Change in the use of medication, non-pharmacological treatment and management strategies.
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Will be measured using a self-constructed, self-reported questionaire
Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Change in health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Will be measured using the EuroQol-5 Domain (EQ-5D-5L) [5 items, range 0-100. 100 means the best health you can imagine]
Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Change in self-reported impact on participation and autonomy
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment.
Will be measured using the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionaire (IPAQ-DK). IPAQ DK consists of 32 items which can be answered from 0-4. Higher score corresponds to less participation and autonomy.
Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment.
Change in Psychological Distress
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment.
Will be measured using the Screening for Anxiety and depression (SCL-13). SCL-13 consists of 13 items from the Symptom Check List-90. Each item can be ranged from 0-4 (not at all- very much). A high score corresponds to a high level of depressive and/or anxiety symptoms.
Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment.
Change in illness perception
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Will be measured using the The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ). B-IPQ consists of 9 items. Each item is rated on a 0-10 scale, with higher scores indicating a more threatening perception of the illness. The total score is calculated by summing the scores of all eight items, with a possible range of 0-80. Higher scores indicate worse illness perception.
Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Change in Pain Catastrophizing
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Will be measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-DK). Consists of 13 items. Each item is ranged from 0-4. A high score corresponds to a high degree of pain catastrophizing.
Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Change in facial perception
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Will be measured using a self-constructed, self-reported questionaire
Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Change in self-reported efficacy of treatment
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Will be measured using Patients Global Impression of Change (PGIC-DK). 1 item ranged 0-6. A high score corresponds to a subjective improvement.
Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Change in how neck pain affects daily life
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Will be measured using the Neck Pain Disability Index (NDI-DK). 8 items ranged 0-6. A high score corresponds to a high impact on daily life.
Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Changes in sleep quality
Time Frame: Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Will be measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-DK). seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Prior to intervention compared to 1 and 3 months after end of treatment
Changes in the somatosensory function.
Time Frame: prior to rTMS intervention, immediately after rTMS intervention and 1 month after end of treatment
Change in the somatosensory function from baseline to immediately after the completion of intervention (rTMS) and 1 month post-rTMS.
prior to rTMS intervention, immediately after rTMS intervention and 1 month after end of treatment
Characterization of PTH headache phenotypes using a self-constructed headache questionaire.
Time Frame: 3 months after mTBI
Characterization of PTH headache phenotypes into e.g. migraine-like or tension-type like using a self-constructed headache questionnaire.
3 months after mTBI
Changes in headache phenotype using a self-constructed headache questionaire.
Time Frame: 3, 9 and 12 months after mTBI
Describing changes in the headache phenotype (e.g. migraine-like or tension-type like) longitudinally using a self-constructed headache questionnaire.
3, 9 and 12 months after mTBI
Characterization of PTH headache phenotypes using the Headache Impact Scale.
Time Frame: 3 months after mTBI
Characterization of PTH headache phenotypes into e.g. migraine-like or tension-type like using the Headache Impact Scale (HIT-6). HIT-6 is a 6 item scale. Each item is ranged from 0-5 ("never-always"). A high total score corresponds to a high impact of the headache on daily functioning.
3 months after mTBI
Changes in headache phenotype using the Headache Impact Scale .
Time Frame: 3, 9 and 12 months after mTBI
Describing changes in the headache phenotype (e.g. migraine-like or tension-type like) longitudinally using the Headache Impact Scale (HIT-6). HIT-6 is a 6 item scale. Each item is ranged from 0-5 ("never-always"). A high total score corresponds to a high impact of the headache on daily functioning.
3, 9 and 12 months after mTBI

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen, Proffessor, Research Unit Hammel Neurocenter

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 28, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Concussion, Mild

Clinical Trials on Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

3
Subscribe