Florida Cardiovascular Quality Network (FCQN)

September 29, 2016 updated by: William David, MD, FACC, Florida Cardiovascular Quality Network
Florida Cardiovascular Quality Network Application of Clinical Decision Support Software Tools at the Point of Care in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease - a Quality Outcomes Registry

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

The Florida Cardiovascular Quality Network (FCQN) is a quality outcomes registry. In a diverse group of clinical sites in Florida, a large number of patients with known or possible stable ischemic cardiovascular disease (SIHD) referred for cardiovascular stress test will be enrolled in this quality demonstration registry. This registry is based on the hypothesis that evidence-based clinical guidelines and appropriate use criteria (AUC), when provided at the site and time of care (point of care), may improve physician clinical decisions and, thus, the overall quality and value of care for individual patients and populations. Specifically, this study registry will utilize multiple proven software tools at the point of care: (1) Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) as the method of measurement of patient angina symptoms; (2) FOCUS, American College of Cardiology (ACC) software to provide clinical decision support (CDS) as the primary method of determination of AUC in patients with a clinical indication for a cardiovascular stress test; (3) CATH/PCI, ACC / National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) to provide clinical decision support as the primary method of determination of AUC in the cardiac catheterization laboratory; (4) PINNACLE, ACC/NCDR clinical registry to provide an extensive database of clinical quality metrics; and (5) ACC CARDIOSMART software modules as the primary patient education tool for effective risk factor modification. The application of these clinically proven software tools, all applied at the point of patient care, may assist physician compliance with ACC guideline based AUC and may directly result in an increase in SIHD patients treated with guideline directed medical treatment as well as guideline directed interventional treatment. It is anticipated that this increased compliance with ACC guidelines and AUC may directly correlate with improved patient clinical outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

4000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Lake Mary, Florida, United States, 32746
        • Recruiting
        • Cardiovascular Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Group A patients will be identified by no established SIHD, but presenting with symptoms consistent with myocardial ischemia; Group B patients will be idenitified by Established SIHD and symptoms of myocardial ischemia. All patients will have: (1) Indications for functional stress testing. All functional stress tests will be designed to provoke cardiac ischemia by using exercise or pharmacological stress agents; (2) Multiple (>3) cardiac risk factors including male gender, age > 50 years old, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, nicotine exposure, and/or family history of cardiovascular disease.

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. Patient presents for evaluation of SIHD and meets patient eligibility criteria as defined as SIHD Group A or SIHD Group B patient.
  2. Patient is over 21 years of age
  3. Patient is a stable clinic patient with the intention to continue in continuous medical care for the duration of the registry.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. Patient is diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina, myocardial infarction -either non-STEMI or STEMI)
  2. Patient has a concomitant medical illness that may limit survival to less than 1 year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group A
Group A - without known pre-existing SIHD
Group B
Group B - with known pre-existing SIHD.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Angina Classification
Time Frame: 1 year
Angina Classification derived from Seattle Angina Questionaire (SAQ)
1 year
Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Stress Test
Time Frame: 1 year
AUC derived from FOCUS clinical decision support software
1 year
Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Coronary Intervention
Time Frame: 1 year
AUC derived from CATH/PCI data
1 year
Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
Time Frame: 1 year
FFR derived from CATH/PCI data
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite Adverse Cardiac Events - Death, Myocardial Infarction, Hospitalization for Acute Coronary Syndrome - correlate with Angina Classification, SAQ, and AUC for Stress Testing
Time Frame: 1 year
Adverse Cardiac Events derived from case report form and PINNACLE database
1 year
Composite Adverse Cardiac Events - Death, Myocardial Infarction, Hospitalization for Acute Coronary Syndrome - correlate with Coronary Intervention AUC and FFR
Time Frame: 1 year
Adverse Cardiac Events derived from case report form and PINNACLE database
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 3, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 3, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

Clinical Trials on none - registry clinic followup only

3
Subscribe