- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04063982
Diagnosis-related Outcomes in NeurocriTical Care: Prognostic Estimate by Health-care Providers Versus Risk Scores in Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (DON´T-PERISH)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The physicians and nurses responsible for the individual patient's care will be given a questionaire. They are asked to estimate the functional and cognitive status as well as quality of life of their patient. The patient with intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage is examined and assessed with respective established and validated prognostic scores and models at the same time points.
The actual prognosis is assessed by telephone interview and questionaires at 3 and 6 months, either from the patient or his/her caretaker.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany
- Charite University Hospital
-
Düsseldorf, Germany
- University Hospital of Duesseldorf
-
Frankfurt, Germany
- University of Frankfurt
-
Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- Wolf-Dirk Niesen
-
Leipzig, Germany, 04103
- University of Leipzig
-
Mainz, Germany, 55131
- University of Mainz
-
Minden, Germany
- Minden Hospital
-
Munich, Germany
- LMU University of Munich
-
Osnabrück, Germany
- Osnabrueck Hospital
-
Regensburg, Germany
- University Hospital of Regensburg
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage or nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage
- Treatment in Centers with neurocritical care expertise
Exclusion Criteria:
- Language other than German and English
- Restriction of diagnostic and therapeutic measures during acute hospitalization according to advanced directives
- Admission > 48 hours after symptom onset
- Hemorrhage due to trauma
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Other
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Rankin Scale dichotomized 0-2 versus 3-6 at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Modified Rankin Scale dichotomized 0-2 (good functional outcome) versus 3-6 (poor functional outcome)
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Rankin Scale dichotomized 0-2 versus 3-6 at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Modified Rankin Scale dichotomized 0-2 (good functional outcome) versus 3-6 (poor functional outcome)
|
3 months
|
|
Modified Rankin Scale dichotomized 0-3 versus 4-6 at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Modified Rankin Scale dichotomized 0-3 (good functional outcome) versus 4-6 (poor functional outcome)
|
6 months
|
|
Modified Rankin Scale dichotomized 0-3 versus 4-6 at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Modified Rankin Scale dichotomized 0-3 (good functional outcome) versus 4-6 (poor functional outcome)
|
3 months
|
|
Quality of life measured by Short Form Health Survey Short Form (SF)-36
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
|
Short Form Health Survey Short Form (SF)-36: Out of the 36 items, the following 8 subscales/dimensions are assessed and compared to the values of the normal Population: physical function (10 items), physical role function (4 items), physical pain (2 items), general perception of health status (5 items), vitality (4 items), social function and Integration (2 items), emotional role functioning (3 items), psychological well-being (5 items), Change of health status, compared to one year ago (1 item).
The first 4 dimensions can be summarized to the physical sum scale, the second 4 items comprise the psychological sum scale.
|
3 and 6 months
|
|
Quality of life measured by Sickness Impact Profile
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
|
Sickness Impact Profile: 189 items in 14 topic categories.
The physical dimension score is obtained by adding the scale values for each item checked within categories body care and movement, mobility, and ambulation, dividing by the maximum possible dysfunction score for these categories, and then multiplying by 100; the psychosocial dimension score is obtained by adding the scale values for each item checked within categories emotional behavior, social interaction, alterness behavior, and communication, dividing by the maximum possible dysfunction score for these categories, and then multiplying by 100.
The scores for the remaining categories are always calculated individually.
The overall score for the SIP is calculated by adding the scale values for each item checked across all categories and dividing by the maximum possible dysfunction score for the SIP.
This figure is then multiplied by 100 to obtain the SIP overall score.
|
3 and 6 months
|
|
Cognitive outcome Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
|
Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status: During the telephone interview scores for 22 questions are obtained and added to a total score.
The qualitative interpretive ranges are 33-41: cognitive impairment unlikely; 26-32 cognitive impairment may be or may not be present dependent on patients's age, education, history, etc.; 21-25: mild cognitive impairment; </=20: moderate to severe cognitive impairment.
|
3 and 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Katja E Wartenberg, MD, University of Leipzig
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 008/19-ek
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.