Intranasal Inhalations of Bioactive Factors Produced by M2 Macrophages in Patients With Organic Brain Syndrome

February 1, 2021 updated by: Alexander A Ostanin, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences

Safety/Efficacy of Intranasally-Administered Bioactive Factors Produced by Autologous M2 Macrophages in Patients With Organic Brain Syndrome

The investigators have designed an innovative proof-of-concept trial designed to provide data as to whether the treatment/rehabilitation efficacy and functional outcome of patients with organic brain syndrome are improved with intranasal inhalations of bioactive factors (BF), produced by autologous M2 macrophages (auto-M2-BFs). The rationale for this approach is the ability of central nervous system to repair and the important role of macrophages in the regulation of this process. It was found that type 2 macrophages have anti-inflammatory and reparative potential, whereas M1 cells possess pro-inflammatory and neurotoxic effects. Action of M2 macrophages is largely realized through the production a wide variety of bioactive factors (cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, neuropeptides, microvesicles etc) that inhibit inflammation, protect neurons from apoptosis, stimulate neurogenesis, the growth and remyelination of axons, the formation of new synapses and activate angiogenesis. This study uses auto-M2-BFs, as therapeutic agents and intranasal administration focusing on nose to brain transport, as a mode of delivery. Expected clinical effects in treated subjects: improvement of cognitive functions (memory, language, attention); correction of focal neurological deficit (paresis, spasticity, sensory disorders); reduction vestibular/ataxic disorders (vertigo, unsteadiness when walking); reduction of headaches; reduction of asthenia (weakness, fatigue); correction of emotional disorders (anxiety, depression).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Following injury to the central nervous system (CNS), immune-mediated inflammation profoundly affects the ability of neural cells to survive and to regenerate. The role of inflammation comprises mostly of macrophages, is controversial, since macrophages can both induce neuronal and glial toxicity and promote tissue repair. The opposite effects of macrophages may be conditioned by their functional heterogeneity. Thus, classical pro-inflammatory macrophages (M1) are tissue-destructive, while anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophages mediate tissue repair. In addition, M2 macrophages predominantly induce the Th2 response, which is particularly beneficial in CNS repair. Using low serum conditions the investigators have generated M2-like macrophages and evaluated their phenotypic and functional features [1, 2]. Our data indicate that M2 macrophages, in contrast to pro-inflammatory M1 cells, produced significantly lower levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-6, IL-18, IL-12), chemokines (IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1-1) and Th1/Th2-cytokines (interferon-γ, IL-2, IL-4) coupled with a higher IL-10 level. M2 macrophages were capable of producing neurotrophic- (brain-derived neurotrophic factor,insulin-like growth factor-1), angiogenic- (vascular endothelial growth factor), and other growth factors (erythropoietin, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor , basic fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor) with neuroprotective and regenerative activity.

Our pilot clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and clinical efficacy of intrathecal administration of M2 macrophages in children with severe cerebral palsy [3] and in non-acute stroke patients [4].

Since cell-free culture medium of M2 macrophages contains a wide variety of neurotrophic, immunoregulatory and pro-angiogenic factors, the investigators expect that intranasal administration of these auto-M2-BFs will improve the treatment/rehabilitation efficacy and functional outcome of patients with organic brain syndrome. Of note, intranasal administration of M2-macrophage soluble factors allow to delivery bioactive agents to brain through the olfactory and trigeminal ways across brain-blood barrier.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630099
        • Institute of Fundamental and Clinical Immunology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults: age 18 - 80
  • Persistent neurological deficits (cognitive, mental, motor, vestibular/ataxic disorders as a result of trauma, cardiovascular, neurodegenerative and others cerebral injuries), confirmed clinically and by CT or MRI
  • A written informed consent of the patient or close relatives

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Seizures
  • Severe dementia
  • Hepatic or renal dysfunctions
  • Hemodynamic or respiratory instability
  • HIV or uncontrolled bacterial, fungal, or viral infections
  • Pregnancy
  • Malignancy
  • Intolerance to gentamicin and / or multiple drug allergies
  • Participation in other clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intranasal auto-M2-BFs

Intranasally-Administered Bioactive Factors, Produced by Autologous M2 Macrophage (auto-M2-BFs). M2 macrophages were generated in vitro from peripheral blood of patients during 7 days.Cell-free culture medium, containing auto-M2-BFs, was collected and aliquots of 2 mL/vial were cryopreserved.

30 patients with organic brain syndrome will receive auto-M2-BFs with the aerosol inhaler device (nebulizer), 2.0 mL once a day up to 30 days.
Drug: Intranasal auto-M2-BFs
Delivery is performed with the aerosol inhaler device (nebulizer), 2.0 mL once a day up to 30 days.
Other Names:
  • Bioactive Factors, Produced by M2 Macrophage

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Patients With Severe Adverse Events and Adverse Reactions
Time Frame: up to 6 months after treatment
Occurrence of severe adverse events and adverse reactions (allergic, toxic, inflammatory reactions; neurological deterioration, convulsive syndrome)
up to 6 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Subjective Assessment of Clinical Symptoms (SACS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment
Subjective Assessment of Clinical Symptoms (SACS) is a 5-point rating scale with standardized criteria (0 - no; 1 - mild; 2 - moderate; 3 - severe; 4 - intensive) subjective assessment of the severity of fifteen clinical symptoms most characteristic of neurological disorders (headache, dizziness, gait disturbance, speech, visual impairment, tremor et al). Minimum SACS "total" score is 0, and maximum SACS "total" score is 60. Neurological improvements are assessed by SACS "total" score as > 6 points' reduction from baseline.
Baseline and 6 months after treatment
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is used to diagnose anxiety/depression symptoms (absence - 0~7 points; subclinical form - 8~10 points; clinical form - 11 points or more). Minimum HADS "total" score (anxiety + depression subscale) is 0, and maximum HADS "total" score is 42. Improvements in patients with anxiety/depression symptoms are assessed by HADS "total" score as > 4 points reduction from baseline.
Baseline and 6 months after treatment
Change in Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment

Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) iscale is designed to evaluate parameters characterizing stability (0~24 points) and gait (0~16 points).

The maximum FMA "total" score on stability and gait subscales is 39-40 and corresponds to the norm, minimum FMA "total" score is 0 and corresponds to the gross impairment. The degree of impairment of "total" score is divided into significant (0~20 points), moderate (21~33 points), and light (34~38 points), whereas 39~40 points indicate no impairments. Improved mobility is assessed as FMA "total" score enhancement > 4 points from baseline.
Baseline and 6 months after treatment
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (МоСА)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa) is used to assess cognitive functions. The maximum MoCa "total" score is 26-30 points and corresponds to the norm, 19-25 points - mild cognitive disorder; 11-21 points - dementia. Improvements in patients with cognitive disorder are assessed as MoCA "total" score increase > 3 points from baseline.
Baseline and 6 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Russian Academy of Medical Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IFCI-25/05/2015

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurocognitive Disorders

Clinical Trials on Intranasal auto-M2-BFs

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Malawi

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe