Switching From Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Abacavir or Tenofovir Alafenamide (BACTAF)

January 27, 2020 updated by: Bart Rijnders, Erasmus Medical Center

Switching to Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate or Abacavir in Patients With Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Associated eGFR Decline. A Randomized Trial.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is one of the most frequently used drugs to treat HIV. Long term use of TDF can induce renal toxicity. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a new pro-drug of Tenofovir which has not been associated with renal toxicity and may therefore be a good substitute for TDF in patients with TDF induced renal toxicity. Abacavir (ABC) is another drug that can be used for the treatment of HIV and is not associated with renal toxicity.

In this study the investigators will compare the effect on renal function of a switch from TDF to TAF with a switch from TDF to ABC in patients with TDF induced renal insufficiency.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The majority of HIV-1 infected patients in resource rich countries receive the tenofovir prodrug tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) as part of their combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Long-term exposure to TDF can be associated with an accelerated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline and proximal renal tubular dysfunction (PTD, see definition below). The current practice in patients in which TDF related renal toxicity becomes apparent is to substitute abacavir (ABC) for TDF. However, ABC is contraindicated in patients with HLAB57*01 and has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in large HIV cohort studies, but not in randomized clinical trials. Recently, a new tenofovir prodrug, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) was developed by Gilead Sciences and is available in a coformulation with emtricitabine (FTC). Due to the targeted delivery of tenofovir inside the CD4 positive cell by this prodrug, only 25 mg TAF is needed for the same antiviral effect observed in patients taking 250 mg of TDF and this lower TAF dose leads to 90% lower serum levels of tenofovir. In recently completed phase III studies in which patients with a normal kidney function where included, this lower tenofovir exposure in patients on TAF was shown to prevent off-target renal and bone toxicity in comparison with patients taking TDF. However, whether an already established TDF related renal toxicity in a HIV patient can be reversed after a switch to TAF, remains to be shown.

Objective:

To study the renal safety when HIV patients with TDF related renal toxicity switch to TAF compared to the current practice of switching to ABC.

Study design:

96 week open label multicenter randomized non-inferiority clinical trial.

Study population:

HIV-1 infected adults, suppressed HIV-RNA <50c/mL on a TDF containing antiretroviral regimen, with signs of TDF related renal toxicity as indicated by an accelerated eGFR decline.

Intervention:

Replace TDF with TAF (intervention arm) or ABC (control arm).

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Primary endpoint:

Recovery of renal dysfunction in the TAF arm versus the ABC arm at 48 weeks after the switch from TDF to TAF or ABC using the time to the first eGFR within 75% of the eGFR at the time of TDF initiation.

Secondary endpoints:

See below

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1066EC
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1091AC
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3000CA
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3079DZ
    • Gelderland
      • Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Ziekenhuis Rijnstate
        • Contact:
          • Marc Claassen, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

HIV-positive documented by ELISA or Western Blot or plasma HIV-RNA > 1000 copies/mL.

18 years or older. Stable on TDF/FTC or TDF/3TC for ≥12 months (365 days) in combination with a third antiretroviral agent (NNRTI, INI, or PI) and with an unchanged third agent for at least 1 month.

HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for ≥ 6 months. Patient is negative for the HLA B5701 allele.

Confirmed/probable TDF-related accelerated eGFR decline (one of the following):

  1. Accelerated eGFR decline: mean of > 3 mL/min/year since start TDF after ≥5 years of TDF exposure.
  2. Confirmed eGFR < 70 mL/min in patients with baseline eGFR > 90 mL/min at start of TDF.
  3. eGFR decrease > 25% compared to baseline eGFR at TDF-initiation.

Absence of other causes of eGFR decline:

Diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy (defined as an eGFR decline and uACR>30mg/mmol with uAPR >/=0.4, or biopsy proven).

Hypertensive patients (defined as the use of antihypertensives or untreated systolic (>=160mmHg) or diastolic (>=95mmHg) hypertension) in combination with hypertensive nephropathy (defined as eGFR decline with uACR>30mg/mmol with uAPR>/=0.4, or biopsy proven).

Nephrotic syndromes/nephrotic range proteinuria (uACR >300mg/mmol and uAPR ≥ 0.4, or total 24hrs proteinuria >3.5g/24hr, or biopsy proven) Nephrotic syndromes including rapid progressive glomerulonephritis and tubular interstitial nephritis (defined as active urine sediment with erythrocyturia and leucocyturia and proteinuria with eGFR decline, with or without the presence of systemic disease, or biopsy proven).

Obvious other renal toxic effects related to lifestyle or medication (e.g. creatin use) suspected by the investigators or biopsy proven.

Concomittantly used medication does not interfere with trial procedures (on investigators' discretion).

Exclusion Criteria:

Likely other cause (as defined above) of the accelerated GFR decline. HLA-B5701 positivity. Active hepatitis C or B. Documented intermediate or high level resistance to ABC. eGFR <30ml/min. Any other disease or medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigators, would interfere with the safety of the participant or the conduct of the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Switch to tenofovir alafenamide
Switch from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) to tenofovir alafenamide
Other Names:
  • Descovy
  • TAF
Active Comparator: Switch to abacavir
Switch from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) to abacavir
Other Names:
  • ABC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recovery of renal insufficiency
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Recovery of renal dysfunction in the TAF arm versus the ABC arm at 48 weeks after the switch from TDF to TAF or ABC using the time to the first eGFR within 75% of the eGFR at the time of TDF initiation.
48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to recovery of renal dysfunction
Time Frame: 96 weeks
The between group differences (TAF vs ABC) with respect to the time to recovery of renal dysfunction (eGFR improvement to within 75% of eGFR at TDF initiation) at week 96, with adjustment for potentially important confounders.
96 weeks
Slope of eGFR-decline/increase
Time Frame: 96 weeks
The mean eGFR at week 48 and 96 on ABC and TAF will be compared to week 0. The slopes of eGFR-decline/increase between week 0, week 48 and 96 will be compared between the ABC and TAF group.
96 weeks
Recovery of proteinuria
Time Frame: 96 weeks
The median (IQR) of uPCR, uACR, uAPR, uB2MG/CR changes at week 48 and 96 compared to week 0 within the ABC and TAF group and difference in change between both groups.
96 weeks
Recovery of proximal tubular dysfunction
Time Frame: 96 weeks
Changes in the number of patients with at least 2 markers of PTD from week 0 to week 48 within the ABC and TAF group and difference in change of PTD markers between both groups .
96 weeks
plasma HIV RNA <50c/ml
Time Frame: 96 weeks
HIV-RNA suppression rate <50 ABC versus TAF at week 48 and 96.
96 weeks
Adverse events
Time Frame: 96 weeks
Tolerability of TAF versus ABC, defined in terms of adverse events (%).
96 weeks
Framingham risk score
Time Frame: 96 weeks
Change in framingham risk-score, blood pressure, lipids and inflammation parameters at week 0, 48 and 96 within the ABC and TAF group and comparison of between group differences of these parameters.
96 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bart Rijnders, MD PhD, Erasmus MC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hiv

Clinical Trials on tenofovir alafenamide

3
Subscribe