Subacromial Impingement Syndrome Approach Using High Intensity Laser Therapy

November 6, 2017 updated by: University of Castilla-La Mancha

Effectiveness of High Intensity Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of high intensity laser therapy in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Shoulder pain has a high prevalence in our society, several studies estimate an annual prevalence between 5% and 47%. It is one of the main causes of musculoskeletal pain, particularly in third place, after the low back pain and neck pain.

Symptoms of pathologies of subacromial space impingement syndrome, where, regardless of origin, pain is the number one symptom for the patient, which emanates functional impairment and the impact on quality of life. Because of the need to implement research to assess the effectiveness of high intensity laser therapy with new studies mayor methodological quality of obtaining conclusive results, and based on the scientific evidence supporting the low-power laser therapy as a useful tool in addressing the shoulder tendon pathology, we consider very interesting the realization of this research project.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Toledo
      • Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain, 45600
        • Hospital General Nuestra Señora del Prado

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients between 18 and 75 years old with diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome or any of the pathologies that compose it (tendinosis-tendinitis supraspinatus and rest of the rotator cuff, subacromial bursitis and tendinitis of the long head of the biceps).
  • Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) less than or equal to 7.
  • Forward flexion at least of 100º

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Calcific tendinitis
  • Complete rupture of the rotator cuff.
  • Adhesive capsulitis.
  • Clinical history of pathologies that without affecting the shoulder joint refer to painful shoulder symptoms (cervical root involvement, cervical surgery, cervical osteoarthritis and neurological pathologies)
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Be receiving physiotherapeutic treatment or have received it previously for this pathology one month before the start of treatment.
  • Patients with alterations of thermal sensitivity.
  • Derived from the absolute and relative contraindications of Laser Therapy:
  • Photosensitive patients
  • Neoplastic processes
  • Hyperthyroidism
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with a history of epileptic seizures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High-intensity laser therapy
High-intensity laser therapy application through iLux Laser device

Treatment during 15 sessions. It is divided in two phases: 1. 12W. 50 Hz 20% duty cycle. 50 J/cm² in painful zone. 2. 15 W. Burst (10 pulses-900 msec each train) 250 J/cm² in painful zone. Trough the iLux Laser (Mectronic Medicale, Italy)

+ Physical Therapy protocol.

Sham Comparator: Sham device
Sham high-intensity laser therapy application through sham iLux Laser device
Sham treatment during 15 sessions trough the iLux Laser (Mectronic Medicale, Italy), It is applies the same time than experimental one but with 0 W + Physical Therapy protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Time Frame: Baseline
SPADI test
Baseline
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Time Frame: At the end of the laser protocol treatment (1 daily session during 15 workday -from monday to friday-)
SPADI test
At the end of the laser protocol treatment (1 daily session during 15 workday -from monday to friday-)
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Time Frame: one month after the end of the protocol treatment
SPADI test
one month after the end of the protocol treatment
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Time Frame: three months after the end of the protocol treatment
SPADI test
three months after the end of the protocol treatment
Constant-Murley Score
Time Frame: Baseline
Constant-Murley Score without strength section. The results will be expressed on a maximum of 75 points.
Baseline
Constant-Murley Score
Time Frame: At the end of the laser protocol treatment (1 daily session during 15 workday -from monday to friday-)
Constant-Murley Score without strength section. The results will be expressed on a maximum of 75 points.
At the end of the laser protocol treatment (1 daily session during 15 workday -from monday to friday-)
Constant-Murley Score
Time Frame: one month after the end of the protocol treatment
Constant-Murley Score without strength section. The results will be expressed on a maximum of 75 points.
one month after the end of the protocol treatment
Constant-Murley Score
Time Frame: three months after the end of the protocol treatment
Constant-Murley Score without strength section. The results will be expressed on a maximum of 75 points.
three months after the end of the protocol treatment
Quick-Dash Abbreviated
Time Frame: Baseline
Quick- Dash Abbreviated test
Baseline
Quick-Dash Abbreviated
Time Frame: At the end of the laser protocol treatment (1 daily session during 15 workday -from monday to friday-)
Quick- Dash Abbreviated test
At the end of the laser protocol treatment (1 daily session during 15 workday -from monday to friday-)
Quick-Dash Abbreviated
Time Frame: one month after the end of the protocol treatment
Quick- Dash Abbreviated test
one month after the end of the protocol treatment
Quick-Dash Abbreviated
Time Frame: three months after the end of the protocol treatment
Quick- Dash Abbreviated test
three months after the end of the protocol treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Painful pressure threshold
Time Frame: Baseline, at the of the 15 sessions, one month after the end of the protocol treatment, three months after the end of the protocol treatment
The pressure pain threshold will be measured by a pressure algometer and will be expressed in Newton.
Baseline, at the of the 15 sessions, one month after the end of the protocol treatment, three months after the end of the protocol treatment
Painful pressure threshold after first session
Time Frame: First session - 15 minutes after laser or sham treatment.
The pressure pain threshold will be measured by a pressure algometer and will be expressed in Newton.
First session - 15 minutes after laser or sham treatment.
VAS
Time Frame: Baseline, at the of the 15 sessions, one month after the end of the protocol treatment, three months after the end of the protocol treatment
Visual analogue scale
Baseline, at the of the 15 sessions, one month after the end of the protocol treatment, three months after the end of the protocol treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline
EQ-5D™ is a standardised instrument for use as a measure of health outcome.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Javier Aceituno-Gomez, PT, Castilla-La Mancha Health Service

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 22, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subacromial Impingement

Clinical Trials on iLux Laser

3
Subscribe