Introducing and Evaluating Extubation Advisor (EA)

March 19, 2019 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Introducing and Evaluating Extubation AdvisorTM: A Pilot Phase I Observational Study of a Novel Clinical Decision Support Tool to Improve Extubation Decision-making in the Intensive Care Unit

Knowing when to liberate critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation (i.e. extubation) is of great importance as both prolonged ventilation and failed extubation are associated with increased morbidity, mortality & costs. The study objective is to improve the safety of extubation by harnessing hidden information contained in the patterns of variation of heart and respiratory rate measured over intervals-in-time.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

As a standard of care for patients who are intubated in the ICU; to assess ability to be extubated, a Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) is performed, where the level of ventilator support is reduced, and patient's response is observed to predict if they will tolerate extubation.

Spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are standard of care in assessing extubation readiness; however, there are no universally accepted guidelines regarding their precise performance and reporting.

Given that health is associated with a high degree of variation of physiologic parameters (e.g. heart and respiratory rate), and illness & stress are associated with a loss of variability, the investigators have demonstrated that maintaining a high level of heart rate (HRV) and respiratory rate variability (RRV) prior to and throughout the Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) will predict successful extubation, and a reduction in heart rate (HRV) and respiratory rate variability (RRV) predicts extubation failure.

Research to date has already demonstrated the added prognostic value and the investigators have derived a predictive model based on continuous monitoring of respiratory rate variability (RRV). The investigators are now poised to evaluate Extubation Advisor (EA) software with the overall goal to transform monitoring and improve care.

This study is a mixed methods, pilot phase I observational study of the clinical implementation of a novel clinical decision support product, Extubation Advisor.TM In this study the investigators will evaluate the feedback of RTs as well as the feedback of MDs post-treatment (extubation) decision.

Questionnaires will be sent to Respiratory Therapists (RT's) and Medical Doctors (MD's) to solicit feedback on the electronic Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) Case Report Form (CRF) and the Extubation Advisor TM (EA) report. All questionnaires will be answered based on a rating scale of 1-5 where 1 is unacceptable and 5 is excellent.

As this proposed study is observational and has no impact on patient care/outcomes, and to avoid bias associated with requiring consent, the investigators believe this study represents one of the limited circumstances under which waived consent may be permitted.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

121

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • The Ottawa Hospital General Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who are being considered for extubation in the ICU

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. patients who have been or are expected to be on mechanical ventilation for > 48 hours in total prior to extubation,
  2. patients who are ready for Spontaneous Breathing Test (SBT) for assessment for extubation,
  3. the patients who are able to tolerate pressure support ventilation ≤ 14 cm H2O (SpO2 ≥ 90% with FiO2 ≤ 40% and PEEP 10 ≤ cm H20,
  4. patients who are hemodynamically stable (off vasopressors or on low levels of vasopressors: phenylephrine < 50 ug/min; norepinephrine < 5 ug/min; dobutamine < 5 ug/kg/min; milrinone< 0.4 ug/kg/min),
  5. patients whose neurological status is stable (no deterioration in the last 24 hrs, intact respiratory drive and ICP <20),
  6. patients who have intact airway reflexes (adequate cough with suctioning and a gag reflex), and
  7. patient who are in normal sinus rhythm at the time of the SBT (no pacemaker).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. patients who have "do not re-intubate" order documented on their chart or if withdrawal of life support is anticipated,
  2. patients who have a tracheostomy,
  3. patients who suffer from known or suspected severe myopathy or neuropathy (i.e. myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barré syndrome) or quadriplegia,
  4. patients who have been previously extubated during the same ICU admission.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Introduce Extubation Advisor TM (EA)
Time Frame: 1 year
Introduce Extubation Advisor TM (EA) in an observational study in patients being evaluated for extubation, specifically by: (i) engaging RTs to ensure waveform (EKG, CO2) monitoring is in place during spontaneous Breathing Trials (SBTs) and enter clinical data and assessment into the EA data entry screens, (ii) providing RTs and MDs with the EA report at least 48 hours after extubation.
1 year
Evaluate Respiratory Therapist (RTs) feedback on the Extubation Advisor TM (EA)
Time Frame: 1 year
Evaluate: quality and completeness of data elements and process of data entry, integration with existing RT clinical practice and workflow, time to completion of data entry, 48 hours post extubation/treatment decision obtain RT feedback on quality and overall impression of the report.
1 year
Evaluate Intensivist (MD) feedback on the Extubation Advisor TM (EA) Report
Time Frame: 1 year
Evaluate quality and completeness of report, ease of integration into existing MD clinical practice and workflow, overall impression and potential impact on decision making.
1 year
Evaluate technical feasibility of future real-time implementation of Extubation Advisor TM (EA)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aimee Sarti, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 26, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 26, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe