Evaluation of Postoperative Pain After Using 3MIX-TATIN Versus Calcium Hydroxide Iodoform Paste In Necrotic Primary Molars Treated by Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Therapy (3-mixtatin)

October 25, 2018 updated by: Mahmoud M Saadoon

Evaluation of Postoperative Pain After Using 3MIX-TATIN Versus Calcium Hydroxide Iodoform Paste In Necrotic Primary Molars Treated by Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of the current study is to compare a newly introduced material which is a combination of triple mix antibiotics paste and anti-hyperlipidemia drug simvastatin, the new material is named 3MIX-TATIN & will be compared to triple antibiotic paste for management of necrotic primary molars by using lesion sterilization and tissue repair LSTR technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

3Mix-tatin will prepared by mixing three commercially available antibiotics with simvastatin. After removing the coating materials, 3 types of antibiotics are pulverized by porcelain mortars and pestles to achieve fine powders. A total of 100 mg ciprofloxacin, 100 mg metronidazole, and 100 mg cefixime will be mixed in a ratio of 1: 1: 1. Two milligrams of simvastatin will be added to the drugs blend to form 3-Mix-tatin. Preparation of 3Mixtatin will be trained and supervised by an expert pharmacist. 3Mixtatin will be stored in a tightly capped porcelain container, adding a small amount of silica gel in a bag inside the container to maintain low humidity. This powder will be mixed with normal saline to form a creamy paste of 3Mixtatin at the time of application.

Local anesthesia using mepivicaine hydrochloride 3% (septodont, saint-maurdesFosses, France) will be administered.

Rubber dam isolation.

Access cavity will be prepared with a fissure bur in a high-speed handpiece, necrotic pulp tissue will be removed using a sterile sharp spoon excavator.

The canal orifices will be enlarged with a round bur (one mm diameter and two mm depth) to create medication receptacles.

Cotton pellet moistened with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) will be placed in the pulp chamber for 1 minute.

Bleeding, if present, will be controlled by applying sterile cotton pellet moistened with 10% sodium hypochlorite against the pulp stumps and will be maintained for 1 min.

The 3-Mix-Tatin will be mixed with saline to obtain a creamy mix and placed over the canal orifices and the pulpal floor.

The access opening will be sealed with a glass ionomer cement , and the tooth will be restored with a stainless steel crown.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cairo
      • Cairo Governorate, Cairo, Egypt, 002
        • Pedodontic Department Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children age range from 5-8 years.
  • Children free from any systemic diseases or medical problems.
  • Primary molar with necrotic pulp, with pain, gingival abscess, fistula openings, or clinical mobility not exceeding grade two.
  • Radiographic evidence of non-perforating internal resorption, external resorption not exceeding 1\3 of the root, furcation or periapical radiolucency.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Non-restorable molars or beyond repair, for example: decay reaches to bifurcation, a hard gingival margin cannot be established or infection cannot be eradicated by other mean (Balaji, 2007).
  • Patient with known allergy to any type of antibiotics or anti-hyperlipidemia drugs.
  • Patient with facial cellulitis or lymphadenopathy
  • Lack of patient/parent compliance and cooperation.
  • Refusal of participation or failure to obtain an informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: calcium hydroxide iodoform paste
intervention administered to control group is a combination of drugs as follow: ciprofloxacin 500mg, cefixime 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, simvastain 40mg. all are mixed, placed in pulp chamber only one time and tooth is restored
3-mixtatin mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, cefixime, and simvastatin
Other Names:
  • 3mixtatin
Experimental: 3-mixtatin
intervention administered to experimental group is a ready made mixture of calcium hydroxide and iodoform, placed in pulp chamber only one time and tooth is restored
mixture of calcium hydroxide and iodoform
Other Names:
  • metapex

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain
Time Frame: at 3rd months
measurment of post-operative pain by a questionnaire either present or absent
at 3rd months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
swelling
Time Frame: at 3rd month
visual inspection either present or absent
at 3rd month
swelling
Time Frame: at 6th month
visual inspection either present or absent
at 6th month
swelling
Time Frame: at 9th month
visual inspection either present or absent
at 9th month
mobility
Time Frame: at 3rd month
visual inspection either present or absent
at 3rd month
mobility
Time Frame: at 6th month
visual inspection either present or absent
at 6th month
mobility
Time Frame: at 9th month
visual inspection either present or absent
at 9th month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on 3-mixtatin

3
Subscribe