A Study to Assess the Validation and Mapping of the Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment

June 11, 2019 updated by: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

Validation and Mapping of the Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool in Subjects at Various Levels of Risk for Suicide

The main purpose of this cross-sectional study is to generate data to support the psychometric properties of the Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT) and validate its use in participants at imminent risk of suicide.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    • California
      • Garden Grove, California, United States, 92845
        • CNS Network
    • New Jersey
      • Piscataway, New Jersey, United States, 08854
        • Rutgers University
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • University of Cincinnati

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 85 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants in this study will be selected from emergency room, acute inpatient psychiatric hospital unit, or psychiatry clinical research office settings. Participants who agree to be interviewed regarding their symptoms of suicidality will be screened and selected if they meet selection criteria for this study. Participants with various levels of suicidality will be included based on the severity of their suicidality assessed globally (without extensive interview).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant must be able to speak, read, and write English sufficiently well to complete consent process and self-administer study questionnaires
  • Each participant must sign an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that he or she understands the purpose of the interviews and, when applicable, the videotaping required for the study and are willing to participate in the study. Adolescents (minors) who in the judgment of the investigator are capable of understanding the nature of the study can be enrolled only after obtaining consent of a legally acceptable representative. Assent must be obtained from any participating adolescents (minors)
  • Each participant or legally acceptable representative must check a separate box on the consent form if he or she agrees to have interviews video-recorded. Participants who do not consent to video recording will only be administered the SIBAT

Exclusion Criteria:

- Participant has any clinically relevant physical or mental conditions including, but not limited to vision problems, physical disability, severe mental illness, or cognitive impairment (such as from acute intoxication or dementia) which, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with ability to complete the study interviews

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
SIBAT, the S-STS CMCM, and the C-SSRS + CGI-SS-R
Participants randomized to Cohort A will be consented for video-recorded interviews on 3 distinct suicide assessment instruments (the Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool [SIBAT], the Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale Clinically Meaningful Change Measure [S-STS CMCM] and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale [C-SSRS] + Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Suicidality (Revised) [CGI SS-R]). These participants will be interviewed 3 times within the single study visit by 3 different trained clinical raters, using semi-structured interviews that have been developed for each of the 3 suicide assessment instruments.
No Intervention
SIBAT
Participants who are not videotaped for the 3 interviews will only be assessed by SIBAT.
No Intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Suicidality (Revised) (CGI-SS-R)
Time Frame: Day 1
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Suicidality - Revised (CGI-SS-R) was derived from the Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S), a global rating scale that gives an overall measure of the severity of a participants illness. The CGI-SS-R rating is scored on a 7-point scale from 0 (normal, not at all suicidal) to 6 (among the most extremely suicidal participants).
Day 1
Clinical Global Impression of Imminent Suicide Risk (CGI-SR-I)
Time Frame: Day 1
CGI-SR-I describes aspects of participant's suicidal thinking, behavior and related contributory/protective factors, what is best clinical judgment of participant's imminent risk for suicide within the next 7 days. Scale indicates: 0 (No imminent suicide risk), 1 (Minimal imminent), 2 (Mild imminent), 3 (Moderate imminent), 4 (Marked imminent), 5 (Severely imminent), 6 (Extreme imminent).
Day 1
Clinical Global Impression of Long Term Suicide Risk (CGI-SR-LT)
Time Frame: Day 1
CGI-SR-I describes aspects of participant's suicidal thinking, behavior and related contributory/protective factors, what is best clinical judgment of participant's imminent risk for suicide (that is, they will likely end their life by suicide sometime in the future). Scale indicates : 0 (No suicide risk in the long term), 1 (Minimal suicide risk), 2 (Mild suicide risk), 3 (Moderate suicide risk), 4 (Marked suicide risk), 5 (Serious suicide risk), 6 (Extreme risk).
Day 1
Frequency of Suicidal Thinking (FoST)
Time Frame: Day 1
Frequency of Suicidal Thinking describes the clinician determined estimate of the frequency of the participant's suicidal thinking (The FoST rating is scored on a 6-point Likert scale : 0 (Never), 1 (Rarely), 2 (Sometimes), 3 (Often), 4 (Most of the time), 5 (All of the time).
Day 1
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale [C-SSRS])
Time Frame: Day 1
C-SSRS is a clinician rated assessment of suicidal behavior and / or intent. Scale consists of 28 items in 4 sections: suicide behavior, actual attempts, suicidal ideation, and intensity of ideation. Suicidal ideation consists of 5 'yes/no' items: wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intention to act, active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific plan, active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent. Only items with yes responses are listed. Worsening of suicidal ideation was an increase in severity of suicidal ideation from baseline.
Day 1
Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale Clinically Meaningful Change Measure [S-STS CMCM]
Time Frame: Day 1
The S-STS CMCM is a multi-item scale that can be administered either by a clinician or patient through self-report. Each item in the S-STS CMCM patient self-report suicide phenomena section (14 items) is scored on a 5-point Likert scale : 0 (not at all), 1 (a little), 2 (moderately), 3 (very), and 4 (extremely).
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment-My Risk/Protective Factors
Time Frame: Day 1
Patient-reported dynamic suicide risk and protective characteristics (My Risk/Protective Factors) will be assessed based on Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT) with up to 31 items that best describes how participant have acted or felt in the past 7 days in terms of responses (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Most of the time, All the time). This best describes how participants are thinking or feeling right now in terms of Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Slightly Disagree, Slightly agree, Agree, Strongly Agree.
Day 1
Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment: My Current Thinking
Time Frame: Day 1
Patient-reported current suicide ideation (My current thinking) will be assessed based on SIBAT with 48 items. The best describes how participants are thinking or feeling right now in terms of Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Slightly Disagree, Slightly agree, Agree, Strongly Agree.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 31, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CR108248
  • 54135419SUI0001 (Other Identifier: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suicidality

Clinical Trials on No Intervention

3
Subscribe