Comparative Tests of Flu Vaccination Phone Messages

May 13, 2018 updated by: Brian Zikmund-Fisher, University of Michigan
This project is a partnership between Emmi Solutions, a private company that delivers health promotion messages to employees of client organizations, and the University of Michigan and affiliated academic investigators. In particular, Emmi sends out pre-recorded and interactive telephone calls on behalf of their healthcare clients to promote influenza vaccination each Fall. The collaboration will design various scripts (based on established risk communication, behavior change, and behavioral economic principles) to be pre-recorded and sent out on these calls on a randomized basis (with approval by client organizations), with the number of arms to vary based on the size of each client's participant list (to ensure sufficient statistical power within each client's sample). Emmi will deliver the calls and track individual responses to questions posed during the call. Emmi will then provide a de-identified dataset to the academic research team for analysis to determine whether any scripts provided greater or lesser effects to people's their motivations to get a flu vaccination.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7206

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60606
        • Emmi Solutions

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient of client organizations of Emmi Solutions
  • Provided a phone number to their care team

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Viral changes + General intentions
Script language discusses a) that previous years' shots do not protect against current year influenza (viral changes) and b) poses a general question asking whether the respondent intends to get a flu shot (general intentions).
Telephone script language provided pre-questions regarding the fact that influenza viruses change each year
Question language asking about general interest in getting influenza vaccination
EXPERIMENTAL: Viral changes + Behavioral intentions
Script language discusses a) that previous years' shots do not protect against current year influenza (viral changes) and b) poses a question asking when / where the respondent will get a flu shot (behavioral intention).
Telephone script language provided pre-questions regarding the fact that influenza viruses change each year
Question language asking individual to make specific plans to be vaccinated
EXPERIMENTAL: Viral changes + Accountability
Script language discusses a) that previous years' shots do not protect against current year influenza (viral changes) and b) poses a question that implies the patient's care team will be notified of intent to vaccinate (accountability to providers).
Telephone script language provided pre-questions regarding the fact that influenza viruses change each year
Question language asking individual whether their care team can learn about their vaccination intentions
EXPERIMENTAL: Protect others + General intentions
Script language discusses a) that getting the flu shot protects others who can get particularly sick (protect others) and b) poses a general question asking whether the respondent intends to get a flu shot (general intentions).
Question language asking about general interest in getting influenza vaccination
Telephone script language provided pre-questions emphasizing the need to protect vulnerable others
EXPERIMENTAL: Protect others + Behavioral intentions
Script language discusses a) that getting the flu shot protects others who can get particularly sick (protect others) and b) poses a question asking when / where the respondent will get a flu shot (behavioral intention).
Question language asking individual to make specific plans to be vaccinated
Telephone script language provided pre-questions emphasizing the need to protect vulnerable others
EXPERIMENTAL: Protect others + Accountability
Script language discusses a) that getting the flu shot protects others who can get particularly sick (protect others) and b) poses a question that implies the patient's care team will be notified of intent to vaccinate (accountability to providers).
Question language asking individual whether their care team can learn about their vaccination intentions
Telephone script language provided pre-questions emphasizing the need to protect vulnerable others

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vaccination intentions (Time 1)
Time Frame: Day 1 (Assessed during the intervention telephone call)
Question (language being manipulated) asking whether respondent intends to vaccinate
Day 1 (Assessed during the intervention telephone call)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Documented influenza vaccination
Time Frame: Within 6 months / during 2017-2018 influenza season
Documentation (when available from Emmi Solutions' clients) via clients' employee records that influenza vaccination occurred
Within 6 months / during 2017-2018 influenza season

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, PhD, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 11, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 15, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Influenza, Human

Clinical Trials on Viral changes

3
Subscribe