Optimization of Oral Diet in Critically Ill Patients (NAP-REA)

April 9, 2018 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Personalized Adapted Diet and Nutritional Follow-up With Therapeutic Education in Critically Ill Patients : Impact on Calorie and Protein Deficit, on Weight, Mortality, and Quality of Life

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effects of a personalized oral diet in the critically ill patients during ICU stay and after as compared usual oral diet.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective randomized controlled single center clinical trial. This trial include patient over 18 year hospitalized in ICU and ventilated more than 5 days and/or with denutrition after 5 days of no food intake in ICU without shock and/or respiratory distress. The randomization is awebsite randomization with stratification on age, presence of sepsis at inclusion, renal failure The day of the resumption of the oral feeding (J0), realization of a protocolized swallowing test then randomization and creation of a control and intervention group

Control group:

  • Nutrition in resuscitation according to medical prescription: food recovery with a light meal consisting of soup and desserts and evolution to a normal meal according to the capabilities of patients
  • Daily quantification of ingesta (calories and proteins) by a dietitian until the exit resuscitation. Comparison with caloric-protein targets.
  • Nutritional evaluation before the release of resuscitation.

Intervention group:

  • NAP: "Customized Adapted Nutrition"
  • Daily quantification of ingesta (calories and proteins) by a dietitian until the exit resuscitation. Comparison with caloric-protein targets.
  • Therapeutic education.
  • Nutritional evaluation before the release of resuscitation.
  • Creation at the exit of resuscitation of a nutritional linkage sheet with instructions food

The prospects for optimizing oral replenishment are multiple:

  • reduce morbidity and mortality within 3 months after a stay in intensive care unit.
  • improve autonomy and quality of life after a stay in intensive care.
  • improve the privileged relationship with the patients' families.
  • strengthen links within the resuscitation team and with downstream services.
  • Educate patients on a nutritional level.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- patient 18 yo or above hospitalized in ICU and ventilated more than 5 days and/or with severe denutrition after 5 days of no food intake in ICU without shock and/or respiratory distress

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age under 18 yo, pregnancy,
  • protected patients
  • moribund patient (life expectancy of 48h or below),
  • patient with disorders of swallowing
  • tracheostomy
  • patient with shock and/or respiratory distress

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Experimental: intervention
Optimized personalized oral nutrition in ICU and nutritional follow up with therapeutic educational after exit of ICU
Optimized personalized oral nutrition in ICU and nutritional follow up with therapeutic educational after exit of ICU

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact on the weight 3 months after the renewal of oral intakes
Time Frame: at 90 days
Decrease of weight variation 3 months after the renewal of oral intakes
at 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
weight at D30
Time Frame: at 30 days
weight on the 30th day after renewal of oral intakes
at 30 days
mortality at D30
Time Frame: at 30 days
mortality on the 30th day after renewal of oral intakes
at 30 days
mortality at D90
Time Frame: at 90 days
mortality on the 90th day after renewal of oral intakes
at 90 days
length of stay in Intensive car unit
Time Frame: until the 90th day
number of days in Intensive car unit in 3 months after renewal of oral intakes
until the 90th day
length of stay in Hospital
Time Frame: until the 90th day
number of days in Hospital in 3 months after renewal of oral intakes
until the 90th day
length of stay in rehabilitation center
Time Frame: until the 90th day
number of days in rehabilitation center in 3 months after renewal of oral intakes
until the 90th day
infectious and non infectious complications
Time Frame: until the 90th day
number and type of complication in 3 months after renewal of oral intakes
until the 90th day
quality of life and autonomy
Time Frame: at 15 days
score of autonomy Katz Score from 0 to 6
at 15 days
quality of life and autonomy
Time Frame: at 15 days
SF 36 Score from 0 to 100
at 15 days
quality of life and autonomy
Time Frame: at 30 days
score of autonomy Katz Score from 0 to 6
at 30 days
quality of life and autonomy
Time Frame: at 30 days
SF 36 Score from 0 to 100
at 30 days
quality of life and autonomy
Time Frame: at 60 days
score of autonomy Katz Score from 0 to 6
at 60 days
quality of life and autonomy
Time Frame: at 60 days
SF 36 Score from 0 to 100
at 60 days
quality of life and autonomy
Time Frame: at 90 days
score of autonomy Katz Score from 0 to 6
at 90 days
quality of life and autonomy
Time Frame: at 90 days
SF 36 Score from 0 to 100
at 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Celine Dupy-Richard, dietitian, Montpellier University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 19, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 9661 (Other Identifier: Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium)
  • 15715B-31 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critically Ill Patients

Clinical Trials on Personalized adapted oral diet and nutritional education

3
Subscribe