Clinical Study of UMOD NKCC2 Interaction on Salt-sensitivity in Hypertension (UMOD)

September 22, 2023 updated by: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
The hypothesis is based on UMOD rs13333226 genotype, there are two strata of hypertensive patients. The High-UMOD group (AA genotype) has increased UMOD excretion, greater salt sensitivity, HTN, normal eGFR and greater BP response to loop diuretics like furosemide. The Low-UMOD group (G allele) has decreased UMOD excretion, salt resistance, increased eGFR, increased proximal tubular reabsorption of Na (possibly related to increased GFR), a poor BP response to loop diuretics, and possibly diminished function of NKCC2. The High-UMOD strata will have decreased delivery of Na+ to the distal tubule and collecting duct because NKCC2 function is normal and the study hypothesis is that the participants will be more responsive to loop diuretics. In contrast, the Low-UMOD group (G allele) will not show a similar response to loop diuretics. This may be related either to lower Na delivery to the TAL, because of increased proximal tubular reabsorption of Na+, or a suppressed function of NKCC2. The population distribution of the High-UMOD group (AA) is 67%. Our overall objective is to test the hypothesis that hypertensive subjects with uncontrolled HTN open possessing the AA genotype of rs13333226 will be better responders to loop diuretics compared to those possessing the G allele.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

There are over 1 billion people with HTN worldwide, and the World Health Organisation suggests this will rise to 1.5 billion by 2020.(1) Up to 30% of hypertensive patients have resistant HTN (uncontrolled BP on > 3 drugs of which one must be a diuretic) and ~50% have uncontrolled HTN, with a 7-fold higher cardiovascular risk.

In clinical practice, criteria such as ancestry and serum renin levels provide only a rough indication of the underlying disease pathway and, while pharmacotherapy is the mainstay of HTN management, the selection of antihypertensive therapy is essentially by trial-and-error. Five drug classes are the main first-line agents for HTN, but response rates to any given drug are only ~50%. There are no new anti-hypertensive drugs in clinical trials and there is a need to either develop newer agents or target existing drugs to specific strata of hypertensive patients in whom they would be beneficial. The recent failure of the Renal Sympathetic Denervation trial, which used a novel device strategy for resistant HTN, highlights the limited options available in the management of uncontrolled or resistant HTN.

HTN as a phenotype demonstrates stratification in the population, based on the specific pathophysiological and molecular pathways that are operative and this is reflected in the current NICE guidelines. However, there has been little progress in stratification by leveraging genomic and molecular information, although there is evidence that this may be useful. Monogenic forms of HTN show that identification of the many causative mutations, primarily affecting the kidney and sodium balance, can inform therapy - for example, glucocorticoids in glucocorticoid remediable aldosteronism and amiloride in Liddle syndrome. Despite the successful adoption of the BHS/NICE treatment algorithm for the treatment of HTN, there remains substantial clinical uncertainty about the preferred clinical management of people with uncontrolled or treatment resistant HTN. Moreover, the choice of diuretic, suggested in HTN guidelines, is not based on clinical trials for third line antihypertensive agents. There is general consensus that resistant HTN is due to excessive sodium retention and thus "further diuretic therapy" may be an effective treatment. The choice that one type of diuretic will be superior to another has however not been studied and is usually prescribed in a trial and error manner with diuretics that primarily target the distal nephron (thiazide-like diuretic or spironolactone).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

228

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G51 4TF
        • Glasgow Clinical Research Facility

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hypertensive patients aged ≥18 years of age
  • Patients will all have hypertension that is not controlled to home target: SBP >135 mmHg and/or DBP >85 mmHg on therapy with one or more antihypertensive drugs for at least 3 months.
  • Able to attend one of the three study centres

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Participation in a clinical study involving an investigational drug or device within 3 months of screening
  • Secondary or accelerated hypertension (investigator opinion)
  • Diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or type 2)
  • eGFR <60 mls/min, hyponatraemia, hypokalaemia
  • Pregnancy, breast feeding
  • Women of child bearing potential who are unwilling to use effective contraception
  • Childbearing potential is defined as women who have experienced menarche and who have not undergone successful surgical sterilisation or who are not post-menopausal (irregular menstrual periods, or amenorrhoea >12 months, with serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) >35mIU/ml; women taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT)
  • Women of childbearing potential will be eligible if they are willing to use acceptable contraception (combined oral contraceptives, progesterone only contraceptives, intrauterine device, barrier methods) or they are abstinence due to lifestyle choice or their partner is sterile (vasectomy).
  • Anticipated change of medical status during the trial (e.g. surgical intervention requiring >2 weeks convalescence)
  • Recent (<6 months) cardiovascular event requiring hospitalisation (e.g. myocardial infarction or stroke)
  • Requirement for study drug or other loop diuretic for reason other than to treat hypertension
  • Clinically relevant contra-indication to treatment with torasemide: hypersensitivity, hereditary problems of glucose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency of glucose-galactose malabsorption
  • Current therapy for cancer
  • Concurrent chronic illness, or other reasons likely to preclude 18-week participation in the study
  • Any concomitant condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may adversely affect the safety and/or efficacy of the study drug or severely limit that patients life-span or ability to complete the study (e.g. alcohol or drug abuse, disabling or terminal illness, severe liver impairment, mental disorders)
  • Treatment with any of the following medications -
  • Oral corticosteroids within 3 months of screening. Treatment with systemic corticosteroids is also prohibited during study participation
  • Chronic stable use, or unstable use of NSAIDs (other than low dose aspirin or occasional OTC analgesic doses) is prohibited. Chronic use is defined as >3 consecutive days of treatment per week. In addition intermittent use of NSAIDs is discouraged throughout the study. For those requiring analgesics during the study, paracetamol or opiate drugs are recommended.
  • Use of lithium
  • Participants on the following medications may be included provided they meet the following criteria
  • Use of thiazide or loop diuretics prior to the study if the diuretic can be stopped for 2 weeks (washout) before the study medication administered.
  • The use of short acting nitrates (e.g. sublingual nitroglycerin) is permitted. However, participants should avoid short acting oral nitrates within 4 hours of screening or an subsequent visit
  • The use of long acting nitrates (e.g. Isordil) is permitted but the dose must be stable for at least 2 weeks prior to screening and randomisation
  • The use of sympathomimetic decongestants is permitted, though not within 24 hours of any study visit/BP assessment
  • The use of theophylline is permitted but the dose must be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to screening and throughout the study
  • The use of phosphodiesterase type V inhibitors is permitted. However, study participants must refrain from taking these medications for at least 7 days prior to screening or any subsequent study visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Treatment
16 weeks treatment 5mg/day
16 weeks treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in ABPM
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Change in 24h ABPM systolic BP AUC at the end of the 16-week treatment phase compared to baseline
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in 24h ABPM diastolic BP AUC
Time Frame: 16 weeks
change in 24h ABPM diastolic BP AUC between baseline and the end of treatment
16 weeks
change in day time ABPM systolic and diastolic BP AUC
Time Frame: 16 weeks
change in day time ABPM systolic and diastolic BP AUC between baseline and the end of treatment
16 weeks
change in night time ABPM systolic and diastolic BP AUC
Time Frame: 16 weeks
change in night time ABPM systolic and diastolic BP AUC between baseline and the end of treatment
16 weeks
change in HBPM SBP and DBP AUC
Time Frame: 16 weeks
change in HBPM SBP and DBP AUC over the entire study period
16 weeks
changes in serum electrolytes
Time Frame: 16 weeks
changes in serum electrolytes over the entire study period
16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sandosh Padmanabhan, MbChB PhD, University of Glasgow

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Torasemide 5Mg Tablet

Subscribe